Outpatient operative hysteroscopy: evaluation of patient satisfaction and acceptance

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI:10.29328/journal.cjog.1001098
Crowley Clare Margaret, Gill Noelle, Geisler Minna
{"title":"Outpatient operative hysteroscopy: evaluation of patient satisfaction and acceptance","authors":"Crowley Clare Margaret, Gill Noelle, Geisler Minna","doi":"10.29328/journal.cjog.1001098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To examine patient satisfaction of an outpatient operative hysteroscopy performed by both doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. Secondly, compare satisfaction, complications, and failure rate of these procedures performed by doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. Methods: In this retrospective study, the charts of 80 women who attended the service over one year were examined. Women were included if either an endometrial polyp or submucosal leiomyoma required removal using an endoscopic morcellator. All women had signed a consent form for the procedure. Results: In total 67/80 (84%) patients were satisfied with the service. Nurse hysteroscopists completed most procedures 59/80 (74%). Satisfaction ratings were not recorded for 13/80 (16%) consultations, completed by doctors. There was no difference in satisfaction and complication rates between doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. A total of five patients required repeat endoscopic morcellation, three completed by doctors and two completed by nurse hysteroscopists. For this group, satisfaction and complication ratings did not change. Conclusion: High patient satisfaction and low complication rates were found. Nurse hysteroscopists performed more procedures, providing a safe and useful service. Few patients required repeat morcellation procedures.","PeriodicalId":36268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.cjog.1001098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine patient satisfaction of an outpatient operative hysteroscopy performed by both doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. Secondly, compare satisfaction, complications, and failure rate of these procedures performed by doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. Methods: In this retrospective study, the charts of 80 women who attended the service over one year were examined. Women were included if either an endometrial polyp or submucosal leiomyoma required removal using an endoscopic morcellator. All women had signed a consent form for the procedure. Results: In total 67/80 (84%) patients were satisfied with the service. Nurse hysteroscopists completed most procedures 59/80 (74%). Satisfaction ratings were not recorded for 13/80 (16%) consultations, completed by doctors. There was no difference in satisfaction and complication rates between doctors and nurse hysteroscopists. A total of five patients required repeat endoscopic morcellation, three completed by doctors and two completed by nurse hysteroscopists. For this group, satisfaction and complication ratings did not change. Conclusion: High patient satisfaction and low complication rates were found. Nurse hysteroscopists performed more procedures, providing a safe and useful service. Few patients required repeat morcellation procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊手术宫腔镜:患者满意度和接受度评价
目的:探讨门诊手术宫腔镜医生和宫腔镜护士对患者的满意度。其次,比较医生和宫腔镜护士对这些手术的满意度、并发症和失败率。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,对80例1年以上参加服务的妇女进行图表分析。如果子宫内膜息肉或粘膜下平滑肌瘤需要使用内窥镜粉碎器切除,则纳入妇女。所有妇女都签署了一份手术同意书。结果:67/80(84%)患者对服务满意。宫腔镜护士完成大部分手术59/80(74%)。由医生完成的咨询中,有13/80(16%)没有记录满意度评分。医生和宫腔镜护士在满意度和并发症发生率方面没有差异。共有5例患者需要重复内镜碎裂,其中3例由医生完成,2例由宫腔镜护士完成。对于这一组,满意度和并发症评分没有改变。结论:患者满意度高,并发症发生率低。宫腔镜护士进行了更多的手术,提供了安全和有用的服务。很少有患者需要重复分块手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Management of Congenital Cervical Teratoma with Application of EXIT Protocol - Case Report Reverse Breech Extraction versus Vaginal Push before Uterine Incision during Cesarean Section with Fully Dilated Cervix and Impacted Fetal Head Postdate Pregnancy Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Sudanese Women Age as a Predictor of Time to Response for Patients Undergoing Medical Management of Endometrial Cancer Ectopic Pregnancy Risk Factors Presentation and Management Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1