Optimization Analysis for Innovative Inputs under the Objective Discrepancy between Government and Enterprise

Wu Kai, Huiying Zhang
{"title":"Optimization Analysis for Innovative Inputs under the Objective Discrepancy between Government and Enterprise","authors":"Wu Kai, Huiying Zhang","doi":"10.1155/2023/1082058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiming at the improvement of innovation efficiency after enterprise obtaining subsidies, this paper constructs two-stage innovation benefit model about research and development (R&D) and transformation and achieves Nash equilibrium of innovative inputs to solve the objective discrepancy of innovation between government and enterprise. The main conclusions are as follows: there are three kinds of resource allocation structure in the way of achieving Nash equilibrium. The allocation structure is determined by the sensitivity of benefits (differentiated by social benefits and enterprise benefits) to R&D and transformation. After obtaining subsidies, enterprise optimizes resource allocation and results in crowding out effect, which is the inevitable choice for enterprise to seek benefits. Relative to the enterprise budget, when the proportion of government subsidies is few, the way of subsidies does not affect benefits. When the government invests more subsidies, which are designated for R&D, there is the possibility of dual losses of social benefits and enterprise benefits. The conclusion defines the proportion of subsidies to enterprise budgets so as to differentiate the allocation structure of innovative inputs. The practical significance is to provide a precise method of resource allocation from the microlevel of enterprise project, which alleviates the objective discrepancy between the government and enterprise.","PeriodicalId":72654,"journal":{"name":"Complex psychiatry","volume":"65 1","pages":"1082058:1-1082058:13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1082058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aiming at the improvement of innovation efficiency after enterprise obtaining subsidies, this paper constructs two-stage innovation benefit model about research and development (R&D) and transformation and achieves Nash equilibrium of innovative inputs to solve the objective discrepancy of innovation between government and enterprise. The main conclusions are as follows: there are three kinds of resource allocation structure in the way of achieving Nash equilibrium. The allocation structure is determined by the sensitivity of benefits (differentiated by social benefits and enterprise benefits) to R&D and transformation. After obtaining subsidies, enterprise optimizes resource allocation and results in crowding out effect, which is the inevitable choice for enterprise to seek benefits. Relative to the enterprise budget, when the proportion of government subsidies is few, the way of subsidies does not affect benefits. When the government invests more subsidies, which are designated for R&D, there is the possibility of dual losses of social benefits and enterprise benefits. The conclusion defines the proportion of subsidies to enterprise budgets so as to differentiate the allocation structure of innovative inputs. The practical significance is to provide a precise method of resource allocation from the microlevel of enterprise project, which alleviates the objective discrepancy between the government and enterprise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政企目标差异下的创新投入优化分析
针对企业获得补贴后创新效率的提高,构建了研发和转型两阶段创新效益模型,实现了创新投入的纳什均衡,解决了政府与企业创新的客观差异。主要结论如下:实现纳什均衡的资源配置结构有三种。分配结构由效益(社会效益和企业效益区分)对研发和转型的敏感性决定。企业在获得补贴后,优化资源配置,产生挤出效应,这是企业谋求利益的必然选择。相对于企业预算,当政府补贴比例较低时,补贴方式不影响效益。当政府投入更多的补贴用于研发时,就有可能出现社会效益和企业效益的双重损失。结论定义了补贴在企业预算中的比例,从而区分了创新投入的配置结构。其现实意义在于从企业项目的微观层面提供一种精确的资源配置方法,从而缓解政企之间的客观差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic Alterations in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Comprehensive Review of Molecular Markers. Olfactory Epithelium Infection by SARS-CoV-2: Possible Neuroinflammatory Consequences of COVID-19. Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Psychiatric Side Effects: A Review Internet-Based Trauma Recovery Intervention for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1