South Korea’s Transformation into an Imperialist Power

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Critical Thought Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21598282.2021.1924071
Michael Pröbsting
{"title":"South Korea’s Transformation into an Imperialist Power","authors":"Michael Pröbsting","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2021.1924071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Due to a combination of specific factors South Korea experienced a rapid process of industrialization and capital accumulation. This process has resulted in the country’s transformation from a semi-colony dominated by US imperialism in 1945 into an emerging imperialist state in the 2000s. Today South Korea’s economy is dominated by large corporations—the chaebols—which have dominated the domestic market for a good few decades. These corporations, moreover, export not only commodities but also capital. As a result there has been a massive increase in foreign investment by Korean capitalists, both in imperialist countries and in countries of the South. Today, South Korea’s chaebols have secured a prominent place among the top global corporations. The chaebols usually consist of a vast network of formally independent firms, but they are united under the common administrative and financial control of a single family via a complex cross-shareholding structure. South Korea’s imperialism still faces some limitations, especially in the political field given the presence of US troops and Washington’s ongoing influence in Seoul’s ruling circles. However, the dramatic economic rise of South Korean capital has created the preconditions to shed these political limitations too in the foreseeable future.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"9 1","pages":"210 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2021.1924071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to a combination of specific factors South Korea experienced a rapid process of industrialization and capital accumulation. This process has resulted in the country’s transformation from a semi-colony dominated by US imperialism in 1945 into an emerging imperialist state in the 2000s. Today South Korea’s economy is dominated by large corporations—the chaebols—which have dominated the domestic market for a good few decades. These corporations, moreover, export not only commodities but also capital. As a result there has been a massive increase in foreign investment by Korean capitalists, both in imperialist countries and in countries of the South. Today, South Korea’s chaebols have secured a prominent place among the top global corporations. The chaebols usually consist of a vast network of formally independent firms, but they are united under the common administrative and financial control of a single family via a complex cross-shareholding structure. South Korea’s imperialism still faces some limitations, especially in the political field given the presence of US troops and Washington’s ongoing influence in Seoul’s ruling circles. However, the dramatic economic rise of South Korean capital has created the preconditions to shed these political limitations too in the foreseeable future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国向帝国主义强国的转变
由于多种具体因素的共同作用,韩国经历了快速的工业化和资本积累过程。这一过程导致该国从1945年美帝国主义统治下的半殖民地转变为本世纪头十年新兴的帝国主义国家。如今,韩国经济被大型企业(财阀)所主导,这些企业已经在国内市场占据了几十年的主导地位。此外,这些公司不仅出口商品,而且出口资本。结果,朝鲜资本家在帝国主义国家和南方国家的对外投资大量增加。如今,韩国的财阀已经在全球顶级企业中占据了显著地位。财阀通常由形式上独立的公司组成一个庞大的网络,但它们通过复杂的交叉持股结构,在一个家族的共同行政和财务控制下团结在一起。韩国的帝国主义仍然面临一些限制,特别是在政治领域,考虑到美国军队的存在和华盛顿对首尔统治圈的持续影响。然而,韩国资本在经济上的急剧崛起,也为在可预见的未来摆脱这些政治限制创造了先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
The Colors of Content Moderation: A Portfolio of Brazilian Resistances to Coloniality on Instagram The Origin, Current Situation and Trends of Racism in the West The Law of Uneven Development and the Transition to a New World System: On the Spatial Political Economy of Socialism From “Authentic” to Actual Marxist Educational Theory: Advancing Revolutionary Pedagogies Medicine, Dissent and the “Chloroquinization” of Truth: Brazil and Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1