How often is Employee Anger an Insider Risk I? Detecting and Measuring Negative Sentiment versus Insider Risk in Digital Communications

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1140
E. Shaw, Maria Payri, Michael Cohn, Ilene Shaw
{"title":"How often is Employee Anger an Insider Risk I? Detecting and Measuring Negative Sentiment versus Insider Risk in Digital Communications","authors":"E. Shaw, Maria Payri, Michael Cohn, Ilene Shaw","doi":"10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research introduced two new scales for the identification and measurement of negative sentiment and insider risk in communications in order to examine the unexplored relationship between these two constructs. The inter-rater reliability and criterion validity of the Scale of Negativity in Texts (SNIT) and the Scale of Insider Risk in Digital Communications (SIRDC) were established with a random sample of email from the Enron archive and criterion measures from established insiders, disgruntled employees, suicidal, depressed, angry, anxious, and other sampled groups. In addition, the sensitivity of the scales to changes over time as the risk of digital attack increased and transitioned to a physical attack was also examined in an actual case study. Inter-rater reliability for the SNIT was extremely high across groups while the SIRDC produced lower, but acceptable levels of agreement. Both measures also significantly distinguished the criterion groups from the overall Enron sample. The scales were then used to measure the frequency of negative sentiment and insider risk indicators in the random Enron sample and the relationship between the two constructs. While low levels of negative sentiment were found in 20% of the sample, moderate and high levels of negative sentiment were extremely rare, occurring in less than 1% of communications. Less than 4% of the sampled emails displayed indicators of insider risk on the SIRDC. Emails containing high levels of insider risk comprised less than one percent or the sample. Of the emails containing negative sentiment in the sample, only 16.3%, also displayed Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, Vol. 8(1) 40 indicators of insider risk. The odds of a communication containing insider risk increased with the level of negative sentiment and only low levels of insider risk were found at low levels of negative sentiment. All of the emails found to contain insider risk indicators on the SIRDC also displayed some level of negative sentiment. The implications of these findings for insider risk detection were then examined.","PeriodicalId":43224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This research introduced two new scales for the identification and measurement of negative sentiment and insider risk in communications in order to examine the unexplored relationship between these two constructs. The inter-rater reliability and criterion validity of the Scale of Negativity in Texts (SNIT) and the Scale of Insider Risk in Digital Communications (SIRDC) were established with a random sample of email from the Enron archive and criterion measures from established insiders, disgruntled employees, suicidal, depressed, angry, anxious, and other sampled groups. In addition, the sensitivity of the scales to changes over time as the risk of digital attack increased and transitioned to a physical attack was also examined in an actual case study. Inter-rater reliability for the SNIT was extremely high across groups while the SIRDC produced lower, but acceptable levels of agreement. Both measures also significantly distinguished the criterion groups from the overall Enron sample. The scales were then used to measure the frequency of negative sentiment and insider risk indicators in the random Enron sample and the relationship between the two constructs. While low levels of negative sentiment were found in 20% of the sample, moderate and high levels of negative sentiment were extremely rare, occurring in less than 1% of communications. Less than 4% of the sampled emails displayed indicators of insider risk on the SIRDC. Emails containing high levels of insider risk comprised less than one percent or the sample. Of the emails containing negative sentiment in the sample, only 16.3%, also displayed Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, Vol. 8(1) 40 indicators of insider risk. The odds of a communication containing insider risk increased with the level of negative sentiment and only low levels of insider risk were found at low levels of negative sentiment. All of the emails found to contain insider risk indicators on the SIRDC also displayed some level of negative sentiment. The implications of these findings for insider risk detection were then examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工愤怒是一种内部风险吗?数字通信中负面情绪与内部风险的检测与测量
本研究引入了两个新的量表来识别和测量沟通中的负面情绪和内部风险,以检验这两个结构之间未被探索的关系。采用安然档案中的随机电子邮件样本和来自已建立的内部人员、不满员工、自杀、抑郁、愤怒、焦虑和其他抽样群体的标准测量,建立了文本否定性量表(SNIT)和数字通信内部人员风险量表(SIRDC)的评分者间信度和标准效度。此外,在实际案例研究中,还研究了随着数字攻击风险增加并过渡到物理攻击时,量表对时间变化的敏感性。SNIT的组间信度极高,而SIRDC的一致性较低,但可以接受。这两项措施也显著地将标准组与整个安然样本区分开来。然后使用量表测量随机安然样本中负面情绪和内幕风险指标的频率以及两者之间的关系。虽然在20%的样本中发现了低水平的负面情绪,但中度和高度的负面情绪极为罕见,出现在不到1%的交流中。在抽样的电子邮件中,显示SIRDC内部风险指标的邮件不到4%。包含高度内幕风险的电子邮件在样本中所占比例不到1%。在样本中包含负面情绪的电子邮件中,只有16.3%还显示了Journal Of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, Vol. 8(1) 40个内部风险指标。沟通中包含内幕风险的几率随着负面情绪水平的增加而增加,只有在低水平的负面情绪中发现了低水平的内幕风险。在SIRDC上发现的所有包含内幕风险指标的电子邮件也显示出一定程度的负面情绪。然后对这些发现对内部风险检测的影响进行了检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF BRAVE BROWSER AND GOOGLE CHROME FORENSIC ARTEFACTS Fault Lines In The Application Of International Humanitarian Law To Cyberwarfare To License or Not to License Reexamined: An Updated Report on Licensing of Digital Examiners Under State Private Investigator Statutes Forensic Discoverability of iOS Vault Applications A Combined Approach For Private Indexing Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1