Lazy proofs for DPLL(T)-based SMT solvers

Guy Katz, Clark W. Barrett, C. Tinelli, Andrew Reynolds, Liana Hadarean
{"title":"Lazy proofs for DPLL(T)-based SMT solvers","authors":"Guy Katz, Clark W. Barrett, C. Tinelli, Andrew Reynolds, Liana Hadarean","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the integration of SMT solvers into analysis frameworks aimed at ensuring a system's end-to-end correctness, having a high level of confidence in these solvers' results has become crucial. For unsatisfiable queries, a reasonable approach is to have the solver return an independently checkable proof of unsatisfiability. We propose a lazy, extensible and robust method for enhancing DPLL(T)-style SMT solvers with proof-generation capabilities. Our method maintains separate Boolean-level and theory-level proofs, and weaves them together into one coherent artifact. Each theory-specific solver is called upon lazily, a posteriori, to prove precisely those solution steps it is responsible for and that are needed for the final proof. We present an implementation of our technique in the CVC4 SMT solver, capable of producing unsatisfiability proofs for quantifier-free queries involving uninterpreted functions, arrays, bitvectors and combinations thereof. We discuss an evaluation of our tool using industrial benchmarks and benchmarks from the SMT-LIB library, which shows promising results.","PeriodicalId":6479,"journal":{"name":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","volume":"13 1","pages":"93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

With the integration of SMT solvers into analysis frameworks aimed at ensuring a system's end-to-end correctness, having a high level of confidence in these solvers' results has become crucial. For unsatisfiable queries, a reasonable approach is to have the solver return an independently checkable proof of unsatisfiability. We propose a lazy, extensible and robust method for enhancing DPLL(T)-style SMT solvers with proof-generation capabilities. Our method maintains separate Boolean-level and theory-level proofs, and weaves them together into one coherent artifact. Each theory-specific solver is called upon lazily, a posteriori, to prove precisely those solution steps it is responsible for and that are needed for the final proof. We present an implementation of our technique in the CVC4 SMT solver, capable of producing unsatisfiability proofs for quantifier-free queries involving uninterpreted functions, arrays, bitvectors and combinations thereof. We discuss an evaluation of our tool using industrial benchmarks and benchmarks from the SMT-LIB library, which shows promising results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于DPLL(T)的SMT求解器的惰性证明
随着将SMT求解器集成到旨在确保系统端到端正确性的分析框架中,对这些求解器的结果具有高度的信心变得至关重要。对于不可满足的查询,合理的方法是让求解器返回一个独立的可检查的不可满足性证明。我们提出了一种懒惰的、可扩展的和健壮的方法来增强具有证明生成能力的DPLL(T)风格的SMT求解器。我们的方法保持单独的布尔级和理论级证明,并将它们编织成一个连贯的工件。每个特定理论的求解器都被懒散地、事后地要求精确地证明它负责的解步骤,以及最终证明所需要的解步骤。我们在CVC4 SMT求解器中提出了我们的技术的实现,能够为涉及未解释的函数,数组,位向量及其组合的无量化查询产生不满意证明。我们讨论了使用工业基准测试和来自SMT-LIB库的基准测试对我们的工具进行的评估,结果显示了令人鼓舞的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The FMCAD 2022 Student Forum How Testable is Business Software? The FMCAD 2020 Student Forum From Correctness to High Quality Concurrent Chaining Hash Maps for Software Model Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1