How do fifth graders understand the language of mathematics textbooks?

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/zipi2201005r
B. Randjelovic, Jelena Stevanovic, Emilija Lazarević
{"title":"How do fifth graders understand the language of mathematics textbooks?","authors":"B. Randjelovic, Jelena Stevanovic, Emilija Lazarević","doi":"10.2298/zipi2201005r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A significant and insufficiently studied problem in the education in our country is the quality of textbook language. It is vital to address the issue from students? perspective (to whom this teaching aid is primarily intended), which, among other things, enables to analyse whether the textbook presents the support for students to learn, but also to examine the extent to which the textbook can help students improve their basic abilities, primarily linguistic and cognitive. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine how fifth graders understand the language of mathematics textbooks. Students (N = 209) of the said age from three Belgrade primary schools participated in the research. The students were asked to mark language units whose meaning they did not understand in two lessons (studied and nonstudied) in mathematics textbooks. The results indicate that there are several types of linguistic units that students evaluate as incomprehensible: words, syntagms, and sentences. They also reveal that the students understand better the language of familiar than that of unfamiliar lesson, which indicates that they would not be able to master the knowledge from these textbooks independently. In the familiar lesson, significantly more students do not understand words and syntagms belonging to general lexical system of Serbian language. In the unfamiliar lesson, however, significant percentage of students does not understand meanings of the sentences used (seven sentences in average). The students with a better grade in mathematics marked fewer unclear sentences in both familiar and unfamiliar lesson. The obtained results could be used in improving the quality of the language in mathematics textbooks, as well as in raising students? language competence.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi2201005r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A significant and insufficiently studied problem in the education in our country is the quality of textbook language. It is vital to address the issue from students? perspective (to whom this teaching aid is primarily intended), which, among other things, enables to analyse whether the textbook presents the support for students to learn, but also to examine the extent to which the textbook can help students improve their basic abilities, primarily linguistic and cognitive. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine how fifth graders understand the language of mathematics textbooks. Students (N = 209) of the said age from three Belgrade primary schools participated in the research. The students were asked to mark language units whose meaning they did not understand in two lessons (studied and nonstudied) in mathematics textbooks. The results indicate that there are several types of linguistic units that students evaluate as incomprehensible: words, syntagms, and sentences. They also reveal that the students understand better the language of familiar than that of unfamiliar lesson, which indicates that they would not be able to master the knowledge from these textbooks independently. In the familiar lesson, significantly more students do not understand words and syntagms belonging to general lexical system of Serbian language. In the unfamiliar lesson, however, significant percentage of students does not understand meanings of the sentences used (seven sentences in average). The students with a better grade in mathematics marked fewer unclear sentences in both familiar and unfamiliar lesson. The obtained results could be used in improving the quality of the language in mathematics textbooks, as well as in raising students? language competence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五年级学生如何理解数学教科书的语言?
教材语言质量是目前我国教育中存在的一个重要问题,但研究不足。从学生的角度来解决这个问题至关重要。视角(本教材主要针对的对象),除其他外,它可以分析教科书是否为学生学习提供支持,但也可以检查教科书在多大程度上帮助学生提高他们的基本能力,主要是语言和认知能力。因此,本文的目的是研究五年级学生如何理解数学教科书的语言。来自贝尔格莱德三所小学的上述年龄的学生(N = 209)参与了研究。学生们被要求在数学教科书的两节课(学习和非学习)中标记他们不理解的语言单元。结果表明,学生认为难以理解的语言单位有几种:单词、句法和句子。他们还发现,学生对熟悉课程的语言理解比不熟悉课程的语言理解得更好,这表明他们无法独立掌握这些教科书中的知识。在熟悉课中,明显有更多的学生不理解塞尔维亚语一般词汇系统中的单词和语法。然而,在不熟悉的课程中,很大比例的学生不理解所使用的句子的意思(平均七个句子)。数学成绩较好的学生在熟悉和不熟悉的课程中标记出的不清晰句子较少。所得结果可用于提高数学教科书的语言质量,以及培养学生的能力。语言能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of play interaction in twins with autism spectrum disorder A phenomenological analysis of teacher experiences during professional learning on the implementation of the question formulation technique Scaffolding the learning during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic - secondary school students’ perspective Teachers’ diversity awareness and critical consciousness - sine qua non of social justice in schools Modeling the relationships between transformational leadership, teacher academic optimism, and teacher engagement: Evidence from the Serbian school context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1