Stakeholder Involvement: An Identified Invaluable Resource in the Management and Conservation of Ireland’s Natural Religious Heritage Croagh Patrick: Insights and Challenges

IF 0.5 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Almatourism-Journal of Tourism Culture and Territorial Development Pub Date : 2018-05-23 DOI:10.6092/ISSN.2036-5195/7728
V. Enongene, K. Griffin
{"title":"Stakeholder Involvement: An Identified Invaluable Resource in the Management and Conservation of Ireland’s Natural Religious Heritage Croagh Patrick: Insights and Challenges","authors":"V. Enongene, K. Griffin","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.2036-5195/7728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to explore how the concept of stakeholder involvement has been applied for the very first time in the management and conservation of the 800 years old Ireland’s Holy mountain Croagh Patrick. In doing so, it explores factors that facilitate and hinder the effectiveness of this new-found partnership towards the sustainable management of this sacred natural site, which simultaneously serves as a place of pilgrimage and tourism. Crucial given scholarly demand for greater understanding of the opportunities and barriers that stakeholder involvement may entail, Woodland & Acott (2007), and even more crucial given that routes and directions for practically implementing sustainability in tourism remain unclear Walingo et al., (2013), and more importantly, the paucity of empirical research that explores the effectiveness and challenges in collaborative efforts towards the management of tourism at sacred sites, especially at holy mountains that are yet to be designated as world heritage sites within the religious and pilgrimage tourism scholarship (RPTS). Utilising a mixed-methodological approach to inquiry, and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders across a range of stakeholder groupings, revealed crucial drivers and inhibitors to the partnership, to include issues of shared ownership, power dynamics, strategic management and stakeholder marginalisation and representativeness in decision-making and planning processes. The study has implications for the conservation/management of natural religious heritages/ landscapes where there is the need to understand the practicality in the formation of stakeholder groupings in the sustainable management of many such heritages.","PeriodicalId":42867,"journal":{"name":"Almatourism-Journal of Tourism Culture and Territorial Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Almatourism-Journal of Tourism Culture and Territorial Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2036-5195/7728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore how the concept of stakeholder involvement has been applied for the very first time in the management and conservation of the 800 years old Ireland’s Holy mountain Croagh Patrick. In doing so, it explores factors that facilitate and hinder the effectiveness of this new-found partnership towards the sustainable management of this sacred natural site, which simultaneously serves as a place of pilgrimage and tourism. Crucial given scholarly demand for greater understanding of the opportunities and barriers that stakeholder involvement may entail, Woodland & Acott (2007), and even more crucial given that routes and directions for practically implementing sustainability in tourism remain unclear Walingo et al., (2013), and more importantly, the paucity of empirical research that explores the effectiveness and challenges in collaborative efforts towards the management of tourism at sacred sites, especially at holy mountains that are yet to be designated as world heritage sites within the religious and pilgrimage tourism scholarship (RPTS). Utilising a mixed-methodological approach to inquiry, and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders across a range of stakeholder groupings, revealed crucial drivers and inhibitors to the partnership, to include issues of shared ownership, power dynamics, strategic management and stakeholder marginalisation and representativeness in decision-making and planning processes. The study has implications for the conservation/management of natural religious heritages/ landscapes where there is the need to understand the practicality in the formation of stakeholder groupings in the sustainable management of many such heritages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者参与:在爱尔兰的自然宗教遗产的管理和保护确定的宝贵资源克罗帕特里克:见解和挑战
本文旨在探讨利益相关者参与的概念如何首次应用于800年历史的爱尔兰圣山克罗帕特里克的管理和保护。在此过程中,它探讨了促进和阻碍这种新建立的伙伴关系的有效性的因素,以实现对这一神圣的自然遗址的可持续管理,同时作为朝圣和旅游的地方。至关重要的是,学术界需要更好地理解利益相关者参与可能带来的机会和障碍,Woodland & Acott(2007),更重要的是,在旅游业中实际实施可持续性的路线和方向仍然不清楚,Walingo等人,(2013),更重要的是,缺乏探索圣地旅游管理合作努力的有效性和挑战的实证研究。特别是在宗教和朝圣旅游奖学金(RPTS)中尚未被指定为世界遗产的圣山。利用混合方法进行调查,并与一系列利益相关者群体的关键利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,揭示了伙伴关系的关键驱动因素和抑制因素,包括共同所有权,权力动态,战略管理和利益相关者边缘化以及决策和规划过程中的代表性问题。该研究对自然宗教遗产/景观的保护/管理具有启示意义,因为需要了解在许多此类遗产的可持续管理中形成利益相关者群体的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health, Economics, Education and Stakeholders: some Ethical Insights for Public and Private Management and Social Accounting Institutional Quality and Tourism: Panel Causality Analysis in the Case of Mediterranean Countries Gambling and (“Dark”) Flow. A holistic Study with Best Practice Cases on How to Minimize Harm From Sport to Gambling in the SISAL Case: the Accounting and Accountability Role COVID 19 - The External Economic Shock: Changing the Business Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1