My Doctoral Journey: An Autoethnography of Doing Sensitive Research in a Different Cultural Context

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-07 DOI:10.28945/4641
U. Ramanayake
{"title":"My Doctoral Journey: An Autoethnography of Doing Sensitive Research in a Different Cultural Context","authors":"U. Ramanayake","doi":"10.28945/4641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose This paper aims to provide important learning insights for doctoral students, researchers and practitioners who wish to research on sensitive topics with research participants from a significantly different culture from their own. Background Embarking on doctoral research in different cultural contexts presents challenges for doctoral students, especially when researching a sensitive topic. Methodology This paper uses an autoethnography as its research methodology. Contribution This paper extends the literature on doctoral researchers’ experiences of exploring the lived experiences of senior travellers who have faced major life events. Little of the previous literature on the experiences of PhD students has explored the experiences they had while researching on a sensitive topic in a different cultural context to their own. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper presents an autoethnography of my experiences. Findings This paper presents some critical insights into undertaking research in another culture. Its findings are outlined under the following four themes: (a) Feeling vulnerable, (b) Building rapport, (c) Preparing for the unexpected, and (d) Exploring lived experiences. Recommendations for Practitioners When conducting sensitive cross-cultural research, understanding researchers’ vulnerabilities, rapport-building and preparing for the unexpected are very important. The use of a visual element is beneficial for the participants in their idea generation process. Visual methods have the potential to capture the lived experiences of participants and enable them to reflect on those. Recommendations for Researchers Doing cross-cultural sensitive doctoral research poses a number of methodological and practical challenges. It was very important to gain a wider cultural understanding of the country and its people in my cross-cultural doctoral research. Uditha Ramanayake University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand uditha.ramanayake@outlook.com","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":"559-573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim/Purpose This paper aims to provide important learning insights for doctoral students, researchers and practitioners who wish to research on sensitive topics with research participants from a significantly different culture from their own. Background Embarking on doctoral research in different cultural contexts presents challenges for doctoral students, especially when researching a sensitive topic. Methodology This paper uses an autoethnography as its research methodology. Contribution This paper extends the literature on doctoral researchers’ experiences of exploring the lived experiences of senior travellers who have faced major life events. Little of the previous literature on the experiences of PhD students has explored the experiences they had while researching on a sensitive topic in a different cultural context to their own. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper presents an autoethnography of my experiences. Findings This paper presents some critical insights into undertaking research in another culture. Its findings are outlined under the following four themes: (a) Feeling vulnerable, (b) Building rapport, (c) Preparing for the unexpected, and (d) Exploring lived experiences. Recommendations for Practitioners When conducting sensitive cross-cultural research, understanding researchers’ vulnerabilities, rapport-building and preparing for the unexpected are very important. The use of a visual element is beneficial for the participants in their idea generation process. Visual methods have the potential to capture the lived experiences of participants and enable them to reflect on those. Recommendations for Researchers Doing cross-cultural sensitive doctoral research poses a number of methodological and practical challenges. It was very important to gain a wider cultural understanding of the country and its people in my cross-cultural doctoral research. Uditha Ramanayake University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand uditha.ramanayake@outlook.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的博士之旅:在不同的文化背景下做敏感研究的自我民族志
本文旨在为希望与来自不同文化背景的研究参与者一起研究敏感话题的博士生、研究人员和从业人员提供重要的学习见解。在不同的文化背景下进行博士研究对博士生来说是一个挑战,尤其是在研究一个敏感的话题时。本文的研究方法是用民族志作为研究方法。本文扩展了博士研究人员探索面临重大生活事件的老年旅行者的生活经历的文献。以前关于博士生经历的文献很少探讨他们在与自己不同的文化背景下研究敏感话题时的经历。为了填补这一知识空白,本文介绍了我的经历的自我民族志。本文提出了在另一种文化中进行研究的一些重要见解。它的调查结果概述在以下四个主题下:(a)感到脆弱;(b)建立融洽关系;(c)为意外做好准备;(d)探索生活经验。在进行敏感的跨文化研究时,了解研究人员的弱点、建立关系和为意外情况做好准备是非常重要的。视觉元素的使用对参与者的想法产生过程是有益的。视觉方法有可能捕捉参与者的生活经历,并使他们能够反思这些经历。对研究人员的建议进行跨文化敏感的博士研究提出了许多方法和实践上的挑战。在我的跨文化博士研究中,获得对这个国家及其人民更广泛的文化理解是非常重要的。Uditha Ramanayake怀卡托大学,汉密尔顿,新西兰uditha.ramanayake@outlook.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1