Clinical experience of medical students in Children Emergency Room: A cross-sectional study at a University hospital in Nigeria

M. Abiodun, P. Ikhurionan
{"title":"Clinical experience of medical students in Children Emergency Room: A cross-sectional study at a University hospital in Nigeria","authors":"M. Abiodun, P. Ikhurionan","doi":"10.4314/njp.v49i2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Children Emergency Room (CHER) is a high-volume, fast-paced environment where children present with acute illnesses. With the paradigm shift in educational models towards outcome-based education, teaching and assessment of students must be structured to attain intended learning outcome in every rotation. \nObjective: This study assessed the relationship between teaching methods and learners’ satisfaction. We also identified challenges to CHER posting and likely solutions. \nMethods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, using a semi-structured anonymous feedback form to elicit perception of learning objectives and adequacy of teaching methods in CHER. Adequacy of participation in emergency care was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale. Bivariate analysis for possible determinants of adequate CHER posting satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) was done. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. \nResults: A total 112 medical students participated in this study; 51.8% of them knew their specific learning objectives on the first day in the unit. The participants’ grand mean score for learning satisfaction in CHER was adequate (2.65±0.24). Their preferred teaching method was Bedside Teaching/ Clerkship (3.01±0.78) but they were dissatisfied with simulations (2.29±0.91) and participation in emergency care (2.19±0.10). Participants in junior posting were more satisfied than those in senior posting (OR =3.45, 95% CI: 1.46- 8.15; p=0.005). A high workload was identified as a challenge. \nConclusion: The overall clinical experience of medical student in CHER is satisfactory. Our study however, shows that there is inadequate simulation-based teaching, case presentation and participation in case management by the medical students. Curriculum reforms may be necessary to address these identified gaps and improve clinical experience of medical students in CHER.","PeriodicalId":19199,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian journal of paediatrics","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian journal of paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njp.v49i2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Children Emergency Room (CHER) is a high-volume, fast-paced environment where children present with acute illnesses. With the paradigm shift in educational models towards outcome-based education, teaching and assessment of students must be structured to attain intended learning outcome in every rotation. Objective: This study assessed the relationship between teaching methods and learners’ satisfaction. We also identified challenges to CHER posting and likely solutions. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, using a semi-structured anonymous feedback form to elicit perception of learning objectives and adequacy of teaching methods in CHER. Adequacy of participation in emergency care was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale. Bivariate analysis for possible determinants of adequate CHER posting satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) was done. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total 112 medical students participated in this study; 51.8% of them knew their specific learning objectives on the first day in the unit. The participants’ grand mean score for learning satisfaction in CHER was adequate (2.65±0.24). Their preferred teaching method was Bedside Teaching/ Clerkship (3.01±0.78) but they were dissatisfied with simulations (2.29±0.91) and participation in emergency care (2.19±0.10). Participants in junior posting were more satisfied than those in senior posting (OR =3.45, 95% CI: 1.46- 8.15; p=0.005). A high workload was identified as a challenge. Conclusion: The overall clinical experience of medical student in CHER is satisfactory. Our study however, shows that there is inadequate simulation-based teaching, case presentation and participation in case management by the medical students. Curriculum reforms may be necessary to address these identified gaps and improve clinical experience of medical students in CHER.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生在儿童急诊室的临床经验:尼日利亚一所大学医院的横断面研究
背景:儿童急诊室(CHER)是一个高容量,快节奏的环境,儿童出现急性疾病。随着教育模式向以结果为基础的教育模式转变,学生的教学和评估必须在每次轮换中达到预期的学习成果。目的:探讨教学方法与学习者满意度的关系。我们还确定了CHER发布的挑战和可能的解决方案。方法:这是一项描述性横断面研究,使用半结构化匿名反馈表格来引出对CHER学习目标和教学方法充分性的看法。以4分李克特量表评估参与急救护理的充分性。在视觉模拟量表(VAS)上进行了足够的CHER张贴满意度的可能决定因素的双变量分析。p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:共有112名医学生参与本研究;51.8%的学生在入职第一天就知道自己的具体学习目标。参与者的学习满意度总体平均得分(2.65±0.24)是足够的。他们最喜欢的教学方式是床边教学/见习(3.01±0.78),但对模拟(2.29±0.91)和参与急救(2.19±0.10)不满意。初级职位的参与者比高级职位的参与者更满意(OR =3.45, 95% CI: 1.46- 8.15;p = 0.005)。高工作量被认为是一个挑战。结论:在CHER实习的医学生总体的临床体验是令人满意的。然而,我们的研究表明,医学生在模拟教学、案例展示和案例管理参与方面存在不足。课程改革可能是必要的,以解决这些确定的差距,并提高临床经验的医学生在CHER。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Educational Series 2024 Disclosure Rate and the Associated Factors Among Adolescents Living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Gombe Metropolis, Nigeria Paediatric Emergency Admissions, Mortalities, and Unmet Intensive Care Needs at a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Nigeria Association of Undernutrition with Acute Diarrhoea and Recent Hospitalisation Among Primary School Children in Nnewi, Southeast Nigeria Foetal Alcohol Syndrome in a Nigerian Infant: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1