Controlling outsourced management accounting to build legitimacy

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management Pub Date : 2020-04-16 DOI:10.1108/qram-05-2019-0062
Sinikka Lepistö, Justyna Dobroszek, Lauri Lepistö, E. Zarzycka
{"title":"Controlling outsourced management accounting to build legitimacy","authors":"Sinikka Lepistö, Justyna Dobroszek, Lauri Lepistö, E. Zarzycka","doi":"10.1108/qram-05-2019-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explore controls within an inter-organisational relationship involving outsourced management accounting services from the contractor’s perspective.,Qualitative data from within the relationship are analysed in a legitimacy-theory framework, illustrating how controls within the relationship are intended to build the contractor’s legitimacy and what kinds of implications the controls have in relation to conflicts between interests inherent in the relationship.,The legitimacy perspective clarifies that while controls are aimed at ensuring efficiency for the client, they may also provide symbolic displays of the appropriateness of the contractor’s actions both at an inter-organisational level for the client and at an individual level for the contractor’s employees. While the contractor intends to build legitimacy with the client by demonstrating utility in the form of efficiency, the process also gives the client influence and allows the disposition in terms of shared values to be demonstrated. However, this process has some negative consequences for the contractor’s employees as it is insufficient for serving the boundary-spanning employees’ interests connected with the nature of their work. Hence, the same controls need to yield benefits and fair outcomes for employees. The controls simultaneously foster interconnections that contribute to permanence and formalise the outsourcing of complex services, thereby rendering such processes comprehensible and transferable to other settings, which can be seen to serve the contractor’s continuity interests.,The paper contributes to academic research by illustrating how controls within inter-organisational relationships not only steer boundary-spanners’ work to conform to a client’s needs but may also help to build legitimacy via symbolic properties in the presence of conflicting interests at both an inter-organisational and individual level. It specifically highlights the important role of boundary-spanners lower in the organisational structure, who both affect and are influenced by the intentions to build legitimacy with the client.","PeriodicalId":46537,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"435-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-05-2019-0062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to explore controls within an inter-organisational relationship involving outsourced management accounting services from the contractor’s perspective.,Qualitative data from within the relationship are analysed in a legitimacy-theory framework, illustrating how controls within the relationship are intended to build the contractor’s legitimacy and what kinds of implications the controls have in relation to conflicts between interests inherent in the relationship.,The legitimacy perspective clarifies that while controls are aimed at ensuring efficiency for the client, they may also provide symbolic displays of the appropriateness of the contractor’s actions both at an inter-organisational level for the client and at an individual level for the contractor’s employees. While the contractor intends to build legitimacy with the client by demonstrating utility in the form of efficiency, the process also gives the client influence and allows the disposition in terms of shared values to be demonstrated. However, this process has some negative consequences for the contractor’s employees as it is insufficient for serving the boundary-spanning employees’ interests connected with the nature of their work. Hence, the same controls need to yield benefits and fair outcomes for employees. The controls simultaneously foster interconnections that contribute to permanence and formalise the outsourcing of complex services, thereby rendering such processes comprehensible and transferable to other settings, which can be seen to serve the contractor’s continuity interests.,The paper contributes to academic research by illustrating how controls within inter-organisational relationships not only steer boundary-spanners’ work to conform to a client’s needs but may also help to build legitimacy via symbolic properties in the presence of conflicting interests at both an inter-organisational and individual level. It specifically highlights the important role of boundary-spanners lower in the organisational structure, who both affect and are influenced by the intentions to build legitimacy with the client.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制外包管理会计以建立合法性
本文旨在从承包商的角度探讨涉及外包管理会计服务的组织间关系中的控制。在合法性理论框架中分析了关系中的定性数据,说明了关系中的控制是如何建立承包商的合法性的,以及这些控制与关系中固有的利益冲突有什么关系。合法性观点阐明,虽然控制的目的是确保客户的效率,但它们也可能在客户的组织间层面和承包商员工的个人层面上象征性地展示承包商行为的适当性。虽然承包商打算通过以效率的形式展示效用来与客户建立合法性,但这一过程也赋予了客户影响力,并允许展示共同价值观方面的处置。然而,这一过程对承包商的员工产生了一些负面影响,因为它不足以满足跨界员工与其工作性质相关的利益。因此,同样的控制需要为员工带来利益和公平的结果。这些控制同时促进了有助于永久性的相互联系,并使复杂服务的外包正规化,从而使这些过程易于理解并可转移到其他环境中,这可以被视为服务于承包商的连续性利益。本文通过说明组织间关系中的控制如何不仅引导边界跨越者的工作符合客户的需求,而且还可以在组织间和个人层面上存在利益冲突的情况下通过象征性属性帮助建立合法性,从而为学术研究做出贡献。它特别强调了组织结构中较低层边界跨越者的重要作用,他们既影响客户建立合法性的意图,也受其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
31.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management is an international journal that promotes qualitative research at the interface of accounting and management. The journal encourages the assessment of practices in the accounting field through a variety of theoretical lenses, and seeks to further our knowledge of the accounting-management nexus in its broadest (e.g., organisational, social and political) contexts. QRAM welcomes submissions of original research papers, conceptual pieces, substantive review articles, and shorter papers such as comments or research notes. The following is intended to indicate potential topics, but is by no means prescriptive. These topics can be overlapping rather than discrete subject areas, and researchers should not feel restricted by the scope of the topics listed below. • Management accounting and control • Accountability, transition and organisational change • Performance management and accounting metrics • Accounting for strategic management • The use and behavioural effects of accounting information in organisational decision-making • Public and third sector accounting and management • Accounting and management controls for sustainability and the environment • Historical perspectives on the accounting-management interface • Methods and methodologies for research at the interface of accounting and management • Accounting and management in developing countries and emerging economies • Technology effects on accounting-management dynamics
期刊最新文献
When ethnography meets scientific aspiration: a comparative exploration of ethnography in anthropology and accounting How accounting research understands performativity: effects and processes of a multi-faceted notion THE INFLUENCE OF JOB SATISFACTION, WORK MOTIVATION, AND EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL CONTROL AND FRAUD : A CASE STUDY ON GARUDA INDONESIA JOB PERFORMANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE IN SURABAYA: THE ROLE OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1