Evaluation of the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 KPECL and KCECLL Stress Intensity Factors

S. Altstadt
{"title":"Evaluation of the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 KPECL and KCECLL Stress Intensity Factors","authors":"S. Altstadt","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016 Fitness-For-Service stress intensity factor solution for a plate with an embedded crack, infinite length, through-wall fourth order polynomial stress distribution (KPECL) was independently investigated in this work. Finite element models of cracked plates subjected to various applied stress fields were created and used to estimate stress intensity factors (K), which were then used to calibrate the respective influence coefficient values (Gi). The comparison of the newly calculated values to the existing values shows reasonable agreement for some values and a substantial difference for others. The new influence coefficients were also compared to values published by Le Delliou and Barthelet (2007) for the parameter combinations that exactly overlap with API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016. Excellent agreement was found with the new values presented herein. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016 also recommends that the KPECL solution can be used for a cylinder with an embedded crack, longitudinal direction, infinite length, through-wall fourth order polynomial stress distribution (KCECLL) when the ratio of the internal radius (Ri) to wall thickness (t) is greater than or equal to five. As part of this work, influence coefficient values were also calculated for Ri/t = 5 and are included in this paper. A comparison of each KPECL value to its respective KCECLL value indicates that the recommendation is a reasonable approximation. The new influence coefficient values are recommended for fitness for service assessments that involve either the KPECL scenario or the KCECLL scenario where Ri/t ≥ 5.","PeriodicalId":23700,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016 Fitness-For-Service stress intensity factor solution for a plate with an embedded crack, infinite length, through-wall fourth order polynomial stress distribution (KPECL) was independently investigated in this work. Finite element models of cracked plates subjected to various applied stress fields were created and used to estimate stress intensity factors (K), which were then used to calibrate the respective influence coefficient values (Gi). The comparison of the newly calculated values to the existing values shows reasonable agreement for some values and a substantial difference for others. The new influence coefficients were also compared to values published by Le Delliou and Barthelet (2007) for the parameter combinations that exactly overlap with API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016. Excellent agreement was found with the new values presented herein. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016 also recommends that the KPECL solution can be used for a cylinder with an embedded crack, longitudinal direction, infinite length, through-wall fourth order polynomial stress distribution (KCECLL) when the ratio of the internal radius (Ri) to wall thickness (t) is greater than or equal to five. As part of this work, influence coefficient values were also calculated for Ri/t = 5 and are included in this paper. A comparison of each KPECL value to its respective KCECLL value indicates that the recommendation is a reasonable approximation. The new influence coefficient values are recommended for fitness for service assessments that involve either the KPECL scenario or the KCECLL scenario where Ri/t ≥ 5.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 KPECL和KCECLL应力强度因子的评价
本研究独立研究了API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016适用于嵌埋裂纹、无限长、穿壁四阶多项式应力分布(KPECL)板的应力强度因子解。建立了受不同应力场作用的裂纹板的有限元模型,并用于估计应力强度因子(K),然后用于校准各自的影响系数值(Gi)。将新计算的值与现有值进行比较,发现有些值与现有值相当一致,而另一些值则有很大差异。还将新的影响系数与Le Delliou和Barthelet(2007)公布的与API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016完全重叠的参数组合的值进行了比较。发现与本文提出的新值非常吻合。API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2016还建议,当内部半径(Ri)与壁厚(t)之比大于等于5时,KPECL解决方案可用于具有嵌入裂纹的圆柱体,纵向,无限长,穿壁四阶多项式应力分布(KCECLL)。作为这项工作的一部分,我们还计算了Ri/t = 5时的影响系数值,并纳入本文。每个KPECL值与其各自的KCECLL值的比较表明,建议是一个合理的近似值。建议新的影响系数值用于涉及Ri/t≥5的KPECL情景或KCECLL情景的服务评估适应度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-Temperature Design of 700°C Heat Exchanger in a Large Scale High-Temperature Thermal Energy Storage Performance Test Facility On the Effect of Hot-Box Size on Coke Drum Skirt Fatigue Life Numerical Approaches for Bolt Interactions in Flange Gasket Assemblies Experimental Investigation on the Fatigue Strength for Different Tightening Procedures and Materials in Metric Screws Study on Post-Buckling Behaviors of Lower Heads for Fracture Control of Reactor Vessels Under BDBE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1