FUZZY TOPSIS IN SELECTING LOGISTIC HANDLING OPERATOR: CASE STUDY FROM POLAND

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transport Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.3846/transport.2023.17074
A. Tubis, S. Werbińska-Wojciechowska
{"title":"FUZZY TOPSIS IN SELECTING LOGISTIC HANDLING OPERATOR: CASE STUDY FROM POLAND","authors":"A. Tubis, S. Werbińska-Wojciechowska","doi":"10.3846/transport.2023.17074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable and effective selection of logistic handling operator is a particularly demanding process due to the short reaction time or high level of accompanying stress. Moreover, diversification of transported cargo makes use of classical indicators and methods of carrier selection highly unsatisfactory for decision-makers. To solve this problem, managers are seeking multi-criteria decision methods that improve the decision-making process related to the selection of the carrier and reduce the risk indicator related to the incorrect implementation of the transport order. Thus, in this paper, we present a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach for selecting logistic handling operators under partial or incomplete information (uncertainty) and taking into account the different type of transported cargo. The proposed approach comprises 2 main steps. In the 1st step, we identify the input parameters, mainly connected with criteria for carrier selection depending on the type of transported cargo. In the 2nd step, experts provide linguistic ratings to the potential alternatives against the selected criteria and the best alternative is chosen. At this stage, the fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach is used. Later, the applicability of the developed method is presented based on the chosen case company. The comparison of classical and fuzzy approaches to decision-making process is also given.","PeriodicalId":23260,"journal":{"name":"Transport","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2023.17074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable and effective selection of logistic handling operator is a particularly demanding process due to the short reaction time or high level of accompanying stress. Moreover, diversification of transported cargo makes use of classical indicators and methods of carrier selection highly unsatisfactory for decision-makers. To solve this problem, managers are seeking multi-criteria decision methods that improve the decision-making process related to the selection of the carrier and reduce the risk indicator related to the incorrect implementation of the transport order. Thus, in this paper, we present a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach for selecting logistic handling operators under partial or incomplete information (uncertainty) and taking into account the different type of transported cargo. The proposed approach comprises 2 main steps. In the 1st step, we identify the input parameters, mainly connected with criteria for carrier selection depending on the type of transported cargo. In the 2nd step, experts provide linguistic ratings to the potential alternatives against the selected criteria and the best alternative is chosen. At this stage, the fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach is used. Later, the applicability of the developed method is presented based on the chosen case company. The comparison of classical and fuzzy approaches to decision-making process is also given.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊topsis在选择物流搬运业者中的应用:波兰案例研究
由于反应时间短或伴随压力大,可靠有效地选择物流搬运操作员是一个特别苛刻的过程。此外,由于运输货物的多样化,使用经典的指标和方法选择承运人对决策者来说是非常不满意的。为了解决这一问题,管理人员正在寻求多准则决策方法,以改进与承运人选择有关的决策过程,并降低与运输订单错误执行有关的风险指标。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一种多准则决策(MCDM)方法来选择部分或不完全信息(不确定性)下的物流搬运运营商,并考虑到不同类型的运输货物。建议的方法包括两个主要步骤。在第一步中,我们识别输入参数,主要与根据运输货物类型选择承运人的标准有关。在第二步中,专家根据选定的标准对潜在的替代方案提供语言评级,并选择最佳替代方案。在这一阶段,采用了模糊的TOPSIS方法求解排序性能。最后,结合所选的案例公司,介绍了所开发方法的适用性。同时,对经典决策方法和模糊决策方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport
Transport Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: At present, transport is one of the key branches playing a crucial role in the development of economy. Reliable and properly organized transport services are required for a professional performance of industry, construction and agriculture. The public mood and efficiency of work also largely depend on the valuable functions of a carefully chosen transport system. A steady increase in transportation is accompanied by growing demands for a higher quality of transport services and optimum efficiency of transport performance. Currently, joint efforts taken by the transport experts and governing institutions of the country are required to develop and enhance the performance of the national transport system conducting theoretical and empirical research. TRANSPORT is an international peer-reviewed journal covering main aspects of transport and providing a source of information for the engineer and the applied scientist. The journal TRANSPORT publishes articles in the fields of: transport policy; fundamentals of the transport system; technology for carrying passengers and freight using road, railway, inland waterways, sea and air transport; technology for multimodal transportation and logistics; loading technology; roads, railways; airports, ports, transport terminals; traffic safety and environment protection; design, manufacture and exploitation of motor vehicles; pipeline transport; transport energetics; fuels, lubricants and maintenance materials; teamwork of customs and transport; transport information technologies; transport economics and management; transport standards; transport educology and history, etc.
期刊最新文献
A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR TREATING PROBLEMS IN THE FIELD OF TRAFFIC SAFETY: CASE STUDY OF LIBYAN CITIES APPLYING REGULAR RELIEF ONTO CONICAL SURFACES OF CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION TO ENHANCE ITS WEAR RESISTANCE SPATIAL PARTITION FOR HETEROGENEOUS CITY NETWORKS COMPOSED OF FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MACROSCOPIC FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM PANDEMIC IMPACT ON TRAFFIC TRENDS AND PATTERNS IN THE CITY OF BELGRADE AIRPORT PLANNING: APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE PLANNING HORIZON
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1