Vanessa Prado dos Santos , Carlos Alberto Silveira Alves , Cícero Fidelis , José Siqueira de Araújo Filho
{"title":"Arteriographic findings in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with critical limb ischemia","authors":"Vanessa Prado dos Santos , Carlos Alberto Silveira Alves , Cícero Fidelis , José Siqueira de Araújo Filho","doi":"10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70519-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare angiographic findings of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included 161 patients with infrainguinal critical limb ischemia (CLI). We evaluated the clinical and arteriographic (number and presence of opacification of leg arteries) of the two groups of patients. Statistical analysis was performed using EPI-INFO.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most patients were category 5 of Rutherford's Classification and had femoropopliteal disease. Seventy-two percent of nondiabetic and 67% of diabetic patients had opacification of the fibular artery (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.25), which is the most present artery in both groups. Diabetic patients had less opacification of the posterior tibial artery in the univariate analysis (29% vs. 47%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008). But only female sex showed a significant risk for the absence of the posterior tibial artery in logistic regression (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.6; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The peroneal artery was the most frequently found artery in angiograms of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with CLI. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients did not differ in angiographic findings of the leg.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101100,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","volume":"59 6","pages":"Pages 557-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70519-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255482313705198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To compare angiographic findings of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.
Methods
We included 161 patients with infrainguinal critical limb ischemia (CLI). We evaluated the clinical and arteriographic (number and presence of opacification of leg arteries) of the two groups of patients. Statistical analysis was performed using EPI-INFO.
Results
Most patients were category 5 of Rutherford's Classification and had femoropopliteal disease. Seventy-two percent of nondiabetic and 67% of diabetic patients had opacification of the fibular artery (p = 0.25), which is the most present artery in both groups. Diabetic patients had less opacification of the posterior tibial artery in the univariate analysis (29% vs. 47%, p = 0.008). But only female sex showed a significant risk for the absence of the posterior tibial artery in logistic regression (OR = 2.6; p = 0.01).
Conclusion
The peroneal artery was the most frequently found artery in angiograms of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with CLI. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients did not differ in angiographic findings of the leg.