Current Status and Future Directions of the National Examination Standards for Certified Sports Leader (A Comparative Study to the National Examination Standards for Licensed Nutritionists)

Deogjo Jung
{"title":"Current Status and Future Directions of the National Examination Standards for Certified Sports Leader (A Comparative Study to the National Examination Standards for Licensed Nutritionists)","authors":"Deogjo Jung","doi":"10.15758/ajk.2023.25.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to find a way to develop into the valid and reliable national examination standards that reflects field practical competency through comparative analysis with the national examination standards for licensed nutritionists, and also to find problems and future directions of the national examination standards for certified sports leader.BODY In the national examination for certified sports leader, it is important to evaluate the basic ability of physical education instructors to perform their duties in the field. In order to select sports instructors with basic job competencies required in the field, it is necessary to increase the validity of the national examination standards for sports instructors. A virtuous cycle structure must be created by appropriately measuring practical competency in the field, updating the examination criteria based on these results, and increasing the relevance and accuracy of the criteria and practical competency in the field. In addition, it is necessary to periodically re-examine and evaluate the practical competencies of the field according to the changes of the times and environment, actively change the examination criteria and reflect them in the national examination.CONCLUSIONS The validity and reliability of the national examination standards for certified sports leader must be improved in order to nurture competent exercise experts equipped with academic, professionalism, and job performance skills required in the field of physical education and sports. As a way to increase validity, problem-solving standards and item development standards should be prepared, and job performance competency evaluation should be conducted in order to nurture competent sports leaders with practical capabilities.","PeriodicalId":22264,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15758/ajk.2023.25.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to find a way to develop into the valid and reliable national examination standards that reflects field practical competency through comparative analysis with the national examination standards for licensed nutritionists, and also to find problems and future directions of the national examination standards for certified sports leader.BODY In the national examination for certified sports leader, it is important to evaluate the basic ability of physical education instructors to perform their duties in the field. In order to select sports instructors with basic job competencies required in the field, it is necessary to increase the validity of the national examination standards for sports instructors. A virtuous cycle structure must be created by appropriately measuring practical competency in the field, updating the examination criteria based on these results, and increasing the relevance and accuracy of the criteria and practical competency in the field. In addition, it is necessary to periodically re-examine and evaluate the practical competencies of the field according to the changes of the times and environment, actively change the examination criteria and reflect them in the national examination.CONCLUSIONS The validity and reliability of the national examination standards for certified sports leader must be improved in order to nurture competent exercise experts equipped with academic, professionalism, and job performance skills required in the field of physical education and sports. As a way to increase validity, problem-solving standards and item development standards should be prepared, and job performance competency evaluation should be conducted in order to nurture competent sports leaders with practical capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育领导员国家考试标准的现状与未来发展方向(与营养师国家考试标准比较研究)
目的通过与《注册营养师国家考试标准》的对比分析,寻求制定有效、可靠、反映现场实践能力的国家考试标准的途径,并发现《注册体育领队国家考试标准》存在的问题和未来发展方向。在国家体育指导员资格考试中,对体育指导员在体育领域履行职责的基本能力进行考核是十分重要的。为了选拔出具有该领域所需要的基本工作能力的体育指导员,有必要提高体育指导员国家考试标准的有效性。通过适当地测量该领域的实际能力,根据这些结果更新考试标准,并增加标准和该领域实际能力的相关性和准确性,必须创建一个良性循环结构。此外,要根据时代和环境的变化,定期重新审视和评价本领域的实践能力,积极改变考试标准,并在国家考试中体现出来。结论为培养具有体育运动领域所需的学术技能、专业技能和工作绩效技能的合格运动专家,必须提高《体育领导资格国家考试标准》的效度和信度。为提高效度,应制定问题解决标准和项目开发标准,并进行工作绩效胜任力评价,以培养具有实践能力的体育领导人才。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Philosophical Analysis of the Name of the Discipline ‘Physical Education’ and Proposal of Alternative Terminology Effects of Regular Aerobic Exercise on Cardiovascular Health Factors and Heart Function in Sedentary Male Office Workers The Reflection on the Originality of the Study of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences in Japan Introduction for Proceedings of a Panel Discussion on an Alternative Name of Physical Education in the East Asian Cultural Sphere Reconsidering the Hierarchy and Translation of “Physical Education/Sports” Related Terms: Taiwan Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1