Recent middle class studies. Historical and ethnographic contributions for a renewed research agenda

S. Visacovsky
{"title":"Recent middle class studies. Historical and ethnographic contributions for a renewed research agenda","authors":"S. Visacovsky","doi":"10.1387/pceic.24307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text presents the dossier Middle classes: recent historical and ethnographic contributions. The aim of this dossier is to present the renewed path taken by studies on the middle class carried out in the last twenty-five years. A significant part of this research is mainly (but not exclusively) historical and ethnographic and differs from pre-existing studies in its focus on the middle class and the questions it raises. What has characterized this field of studies is less the unified character of its theoretical-analytic perspective and more an agenda based on problems that the usual approaches have not been able to solve or even formulated. Basically, several aspects that had been taken for granted until then were problematized: the “given” character of the middle class; its universalism; the supposed correlation between objective conditions and ways of thinking and acting; and underestimation of internal heterogeneity. Instead, these studies addressed the processes of historical formation of the middle classes, the specificities of national contexts, and the diverse practices of identification and delimitation in everyday life. After the texts by David S. Parker and Mark Liechty in the Fundamentals section, the issue features contributions by Moises Kopper, Leela Fernandes, and Anna Jefferson and Charlotte Perez. The number also includes contributions by Marco Maureira-Velásquez y Diego González-García, Kristina Grünenberg and Anja Simonsen, and Pablo Francescutti in the research articles section, and by Luis Enrique Alonso and Carlos J. Fernández Rodríguez, and Ana Grondona in the Inherited Identity section. The issue also gathers, in the critical papers section, three contributions regarding middle classes (by Lucía Gandolfi Ottavianelli, Markus Shall Enk and María Florencia Blanco Esmoris) and two additionals by Ramón Ramos Torre, and María Martínez.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.24307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This text presents the dossier Middle classes: recent historical and ethnographic contributions. The aim of this dossier is to present the renewed path taken by studies on the middle class carried out in the last twenty-five years. A significant part of this research is mainly (but not exclusively) historical and ethnographic and differs from pre-existing studies in its focus on the middle class and the questions it raises. What has characterized this field of studies is less the unified character of its theoretical-analytic perspective and more an agenda based on problems that the usual approaches have not been able to solve or even formulated. Basically, several aspects that had been taken for granted until then were problematized: the “given” character of the middle class; its universalism; the supposed correlation between objective conditions and ways of thinking and acting; and underestimation of internal heterogeneity. Instead, these studies addressed the processes of historical formation of the middle classes, the specificities of national contexts, and the diverse practices of identification and delimitation in everyday life. After the texts by David S. Parker and Mark Liechty in the Fundamentals section, the issue features contributions by Moises Kopper, Leela Fernandes, and Anna Jefferson and Charlotte Perez. The number also includes contributions by Marco Maureira-Velásquez y Diego González-García, Kristina Grünenberg and Anja Simonsen, and Pablo Francescutti in the research articles section, and by Luis Enrique Alonso and Carlos J. Fernández Rodríguez, and Ana Grondona in the Inherited Identity section. The issue also gathers, in the critical papers section, three contributions regarding middle classes (by Lucía Gandolfi Ottavianelli, Markus Shall Enk and María Florencia Blanco Esmoris) and two additionals by Ramón Ramos Torre, and María Martínez.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近的中产阶级研究。历史和民族志的贡献,一个新的研究议程
本文提出档案中产阶级:最近的历史和民族志的贡献。本档案的目的是介绍在过去25年里对中产阶级进行的研究所采取的新路径。这项研究的一个重要部分主要是(但不完全是)历史和民族志,不同于先前的研究,它关注的是中产阶级及其提出的问题。这一研究领域的特点与其说是其理论分析视角的统一特征,不如说是基于通常方法无法解决甚至无法形成的问题的议程。基本上,在此之前被认为是理所当然的几个方面都受到了质疑:中产阶级的“既定”特征;它的普遍性;客观条件与思维方式和行为方式之间假定的相互关系;低估了内部异质性。相反,这些研究涉及中产阶级的历史形成过程,国家背景的特殊性,以及日常生活中识别和界定的各种实践。继David S. Parker和Mark Liechty在基础部分的文章之后,这期杂志还刊登了Moises Kopper、Leela Fernandes、Anna Jefferson和Charlotte Perez的文章。这个数字还包括Marco Maureira-Velásquez y Diego González-García、Kristina grnenberg和Anja Simonsen以及Pablo Francescutti在研究文章部分的贡献,以及Luis Enrique Alonso和Carlos J. Fernández Rodríguez以及Ana Grondona在遗传身份部分的贡献。在评论文章部分,本期还汇集了三篇关于中产阶级的文章(作者:Lucía Gandolfi Ottavianelli、Markus Shall Enk和María Florencia Blanco Esmoris),以及Ramón Ramos Torre和María Martínez的另外两篇文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Los corretiados y la casa prometida Hu, Guan (2020). Los 800. Película Santiago, Jose (Ed.) (2021). Caras y soportes de la vulnerabilidad. Madrid: Catarata Cuidado e identidad Cómo trabajar la identidad en los estudios de acción colectiva: una propuesta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1