Non-papillary percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones.

P. Kallidonis, A. Vagionis, Marco Lattarulo, C. Adamou, A. Tsaturyan, D. Liourdi, T. Vrettos, C. Simeone, E. Liatsikos
{"title":"Non-papillary percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones.","authors":"P. Kallidonis, A. Vagionis, Marco Lattarulo, C. Adamou, A. Tsaturyan, D. Liourdi, T. Vrettos, C. Simeone, E. Liatsikos","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04124-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTo evaluate the non-papillary puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones in terms of safety and efficacy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData of 53 patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn stones were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. A non-papillary puncture was performed with a two- step track dilation technique up to 30Fr. A 26 Fr semirigid nephroscope and an ultrasonic lithotripter with integrated suction (Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS S.A, Switzerland) were used for the treatment. Demographics and perioperative data were retrospectively gathered from an institutional board approved database.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe average stone size was 60.1±16.1 mm. Mean operative time was 54.57±14.83 minutes, while mean time using fluoroscopy was 2.67±1.02 minutes. Mean number of accesses was 1.2 (a total of 64 accesses). Flexible nephroscope was never used. Primary stone-free rate after PCNL was 81.1% (43 patients). Mean hemoglobin drop was 1.6±1.86 gr/dl. Overall patient stay was 3.94±0.82 days, while overall complication rate was 20.7% (11 patients), with only one patient requiring blood transfusion due to pseudoaneurysm.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe use of non-papillary access for PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones resulted in promising results in terms of stone-free rate, operating time, complication rate, hemoglobin drop and reduced the number of percutaneous tracts. These parameters of the current investigation were directly comparable to current literature. The safety and efficacy of a non-papillary approach for the treatment of staghorn stones could be advocated.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04124-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND To evaluate the non-papillary puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS Data of 53 patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn stones were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. A non-papillary puncture was performed with a two- step track dilation technique up to 30Fr. A 26 Fr semirigid nephroscope and an ultrasonic lithotripter with integrated suction (Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS S.A, Switzerland) were used for the treatment. Demographics and perioperative data were retrospectively gathered from an institutional board approved database. RESULTS The average stone size was 60.1±16.1 mm. Mean operative time was 54.57±14.83 minutes, while mean time using fluoroscopy was 2.67±1.02 minutes. Mean number of accesses was 1.2 (a total of 64 accesses). Flexible nephroscope was never used. Primary stone-free rate after PCNL was 81.1% (43 patients). Mean hemoglobin drop was 1.6±1.86 gr/dl. Overall patient stay was 3.94±0.82 days, while overall complication rate was 20.7% (11 patients), with only one patient requiring blood transfusion due to pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSIONS The use of non-papillary access for PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones resulted in promising results in terms of stone-free rate, operating time, complication rate, hemoglobin drop and reduced the number of percutaneous tracts. These parameters of the current investigation were directly comparable to current literature. The safety and efficacy of a non-papillary approach for the treatment of staghorn stones could be advocated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非乳头状经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角结石。
目的:评价经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中非乳头状穿刺治疗鹿角结石的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性收集2015年1月至2019年12月53例鹿角结石行PCNL的患者资料。非乳头状穿刺采用两步径迹扩张技术,达到30Fr。采用26fr型半刚性肾镜和一体化吸吸超声碎石机(Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS s.a., Switzerland)进行治疗。人口统计学和围手术期数据回顾性收集自一个机构委员会批准的数据库。结果平均结石大小为60.1±16.1 mm。平均手术时间54.57±14.83分钟,平均透视时间2.67±1.02分钟。平均访问次数为1.2次(共64次访问)。从未使用柔性肾镜。PCNL术后原发性结石清除率为81.1%(43例)。平均血红蛋白下降1.6±1.86克/分升。患者总住院时间为3.94±0.82天,总并发症发生率为20.7%(11例),仅有1例患者因假性动脉瘤需要输血。结论PCNL采用非乳头状通道治疗鹿角结石,在结石清除率、手术时间、并发症发生率、血红蛋白下降、经皮导管数量减少等方面均取得了令人满意的效果。本研究的这些参数可与现有文献直接比较。非乳头入路治疗鹿角结石的安全性和有效性值得提倡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Real-life data on long-term follow-up of patients successfully treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Identifying tumor-related risk factors for simultaneous adrenalectomy in patients with cT1 - cT2 kidney cancer during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7 or maximum tumor size > 4cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement: focus on surgical technique and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1