Can organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior reduce workplace deviance?

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Intangible Capital Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.3926/ic.1816
A. Abbasi, Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, F. Baradari, Qasim Zureigat, Fakhrul Zaman Abdullah
{"title":"Can organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior reduce workplace deviance?","authors":"A. Abbasi, Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, F. Baradari, Qasim Zureigat, Fakhrul Zaman Abdullah","doi":"10.3926/ic.1816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This manuscript investigates the impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behaviour and workplace deviance and examines the mediator effect of organizational citizenship behaviour between organizational justice and workplace deviance.Design/methodology/approach: This study utilizes a quantitative method to investigate four hypotheses using PLS3-SEM on 185 respondents from five research universities in Malaysia.Findings: Findings of this study reveal the positive impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behaviour and the negative effects of organizational justice on workplace deviance. Further, the study confirms the mediating effect of organizational citizenship behaviour between organizational justice and workplace deviance significate, especially in higher education. These findings will be helpful guidance for decreasing deviance and eventually increasing employees’ efficiency.Research Limitation: This research focuses on organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviour on workplace deviance. Future study should research some other unique factors relevant to reducing workplace deviance. Although data was collected only once and took almost two months, unequal distribution during the sixty days may affect the accuracy of findings. Future studies should collect data over a period longer than two months to analyze the different reactions of employees to managers’ decisions or behaviorsPractical implications: This study guides and supports managers and employees in putting organizational mechanisms towards improving organizational citizenship behaviors.Originality/value: These research findings expand knowledge on workplace deviance behavior by providing evidence for the different impact of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviour on workplace deviance.Keywords: Social exchange theory (SET), workplace deviance (WD), organizational justice (OJ), human resource (HR), organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB).   ","PeriodicalId":45252,"journal":{"name":"Intangible Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intangible Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: This manuscript investigates the impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behaviour and workplace deviance and examines the mediator effect of organizational citizenship behaviour between organizational justice and workplace deviance.Design/methodology/approach: This study utilizes a quantitative method to investigate four hypotheses using PLS3-SEM on 185 respondents from five research universities in Malaysia.Findings: Findings of this study reveal the positive impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behaviour and the negative effects of organizational justice on workplace deviance. Further, the study confirms the mediating effect of organizational citizenship behaviour between organizational justice and workplace deviance significate, especially in higher education. These findings will be helpful guidance for decreasing deviance and eventually increasing employees’ efficiency.Research Limitation: This research focuses on organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviour on workplace deviance. Future study should research some other unique factors relevant to reducing workplace deviance. Although data was collected only once and took almost two months, unequal distribution during the sixty days may affect the accuracy of findings. Future studies should collect data over a period longer than two months to analyze the different reactions of employees to managers’ decisions or behaviorsPractical implications: This study guides and supports managers and employees in putting organizational mechanisms towards improving organizational citizenship behaviors.Originality/value: These research findings expand knowledge on workplace deviance behavior by providing evidence for the different impact of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviour on workplace deviance.Keywords: Social exchange theory (SET), workplace deviance (WD), organizational justice (OJ), human resource (HR), organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB).   
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织公正和组织公民行为能否减少工作偏差?
目的:研究组织公平感对组织公民行为和工作偏差的影响,并检验组织公民行为在组织公平感和工作偏差之间的中介作用。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用定量方法,利用PLS3-SEM对来自马来西亚五所研究型大学的185名受访者进行了四个假设的调查。研究发现:组织公正对组织公民行为有正向影响,对工作偏差有负向影响。进一步,研究证实了组织公民行为在组织公正和工作偏差之间的中介作用显著,特别是在高等教育中。这些发现将有助于指导员工减少偏差,最终提高员工的工作效率。研究局限:本研究主要关注组织公正和组织公民行为对工作场所偏差的影响。未来的研究应该研究一些与减少工作场所偏差有关的其他独特因素。虽然数据只收集了一次,花了将近两个月的时间,但这60天的不均匀分布可能会影响调查结果的准确性。未来的研究应收集超过两个月的数据,以分析员工对管理者的决策或行为的不同反应。实践意义:本研究指导和支持管理者和员工将组织机制用于改善组织公民行为。原创性/价值:这些研究结果通过为组织公正和组织公民行为对工作场所偏差的不同影响提供证据,扩展了对工作场所偏差行为的认识。关键词:社会交换理论、工作场所偏差、组织公正、人力资源、组织公民行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intangible Capital
Intangible Capital MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Intangible Capital is to publish theoretical and empirical articles that contribute to contrast, extend and build theories that contribute to advance our understanding of phenomena related with management, and the management of intangibles, in organizations, from the perspectives of strategic management, human resource management, psychology, education, IT, supply chain management and accounting. The scientific research in management is grounded on theories developed from perspectives taken from a diversity of social sciences. Intangible Capital is open to publish articles that, from sociology, psychology, economics and industrial organization contribute to the scientific development of management and organizational science. Intangible Capital publishes scholar articles that contribute to contrast existing theories, or to build new theoretical approaches. The contributions can adopt confirmatory (quantitative) or explanatory (mainly qualitative) methodological approaches. Theoretical essays that enhance the building or extension of theoretical approaches are also welcome. Intangible Capital selects the articles to be published with a double bind, peer review system, following the practices of good scholarly journals. Intangible Capital publishes three regular issues per year following an open access policy. On-line publication allows to reduce publishing costs, and to make more agile the process of reviewing and edition. Intangible Capital defends that open access publishing fosters the advance of scientific knowledge, making it available to everyone. Intangible Capital publishes articles in English, Spanish and Catalan.
期刊最新文献
Research trends in the field of organisational management: A bibliometric analysis Integral viability analysis of entrepreneurial projects in critical contexts: Application to the case of the management of a shea mill in Kumbungu, Ghana Ethical leadership and creativity in employees with University education: The moderating effect of high intensity telework Relationship among economic crisis, stock market crashes and accounting scandals Business organizations as living beings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1