Mechanical and Geometrical Tortuosities: Vanishing and Appearing Tortuosities

Robello Samuel, J. Lightfoot, W. Turner
{"title":"Mechanical and Geometrical Tortuosities: Vanishing and Appearing Tortuosities","authors":"Robello Samuel, J. Lightfoot, W. Turner","doi":"10.2118/206188-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Tortuosity is one of the critical factors to be considered for complex directional well trajectories, complicated build rates, precise steering in thin reservoirs, and extended reach wells. This paper discusses the pitfalls of estimating tortuosity to quantify borehole quality and answers questions, such as whether the claimed benefits (i.e., enhanced drilling performance, improved hole cleaning, ease of running casing, and superior cement operations) can be fully attributed to reduced borehole tortuosity. Running casing may mask the tortuosity present in the as drilled open hole wellbore section. This vanishing tortuosity alters the apparent \"wellbore quality\" and the new tortuosity representative of the cased hole path may present new appearing tortuosity. Both vanishing and appearing tortuosity are generally neglected in engineering calculations.\n Conventional methods to calculate tortuosity are based on the predetermined shape of the trajectory using the minimum curvature method. Wellbore undulation (geometrical tortuosity) is determined using geometrical measurements such as inclination, azimuth, and calculated displacement; however, much of this wellbore undulation vanishes after the casing is run, and thus the cased off wellpath appears smoother. This apparent change in wellbore tortuosity results from the flexural stiffness and rigidity of the casing pipes, and the compression and tension loads along the length of the casing string. Acquiring a subsequent survey along the cased well path yields new inclinations, azimuths, and displacements. This new survey records wellpath undulations resulting from the casings path through the original open hole wellbore geometry and what we call tubular undulation (mechanical tortuosity) which is specific to the path and position of the casing within the wellbore. The smoothing of the wellpath resulting from the casing masking original wellbore tortuosity results in the original geometrical tortuosity vanishing while the new undulations resulting from the mechanical tortuosity of the casing causes additional tortuosity to appear. The comparison between the geometrical and mechanical tortuosity provides a method of quantifying the vanishing and appearing tortuosity.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206188-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tortuosity is one of the critical factors to be considered for complex directional well trajectories, complicated build rates, precise steering in thin reservoirs, and extended reach wells. This paper discusses the pitfalls of estimating tortuosity to quantify borehole quality and answers questions, such as whether the claimed benefits (i.e., enhanced drilling performance, improved hole cleaning, ease of running casing, and superior cement operations) can be fully attributed to reduced borehole tortuosity. Running casing may mask the tortuosity present in the as drilled open hole wellbore section. This vanishing tortuosity alters the apparent "wellbore quality" and the new tortuosity representative of the cased hole path may present new appearing tortuosity. Both vanishing and appearing tortuosity are generally neglected in engineering calculations. Conventional methods to calculate tortuosity are based on the predetermined shape of the trajectory using the minimum curvature method. Wellbore undulation (geometrical tortuosity) is determined using geometrical measurements such as inclination, azimuth, and calculated displacement; however, much of this wellbore undulation vanishes after the casing is run, and thus the cased off wellpath appears smoother. This apparent change in wellbore tortuosity results from the flexural stiffness and rigidity of the casing pipes, and the compression and tension loads along the length of the casing string. Acquiring a subsequent survey along the cased well path yields new inclinations, azimuths, and displacements. This new survey records wellpath undulations resulting from the casings path through the original open hole wellbore geometry and what we call tubular undulation (mechanical tortuosity) which is specific to the path and position of the casing within the wellbore. The smoothing of the wellpath resulting from the casing masking original wellbore tortuosity results in the original geometrical tortuosity vanishing while the new undulations resulting from the mechanical tortuosity of the casing causes additional tortuosity to appear. The comparison between the geometrical and mechanical tortuosity provides a method of quantifying the vanishing and appearing tortuosity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械和几何扭曲:消失和出现的扭曲
对于复杂的定向井轨迹、复杂的建造速度、薄储层的精确转向以及大位移井来说,弯曲度是需要考虑的关键因素之一。本文讨论了估算井眼弯曲度以量化井眼质量的缺陷,并回答了一些问题,例如所声称的效益(即提高钻井性能、改善井眼清洁、套管易于下入和优越的水泥作业)是否完全归功于井眼弯曲度的降低。下入的套管可能会掩盖裸眼井段的弯曲。这种消失的扭曲改变了表面的“井眼质量”,代表套管井轨迹的新扭曲可能会出现新的显现扭曲。在工程计算中,消失弯曲和显现弯曲通常被忽略。传统的弯曲度计算方法是基于预定的轨迹形状,采用最小曲率法。井筒波动(几何弯曲度)是通过几何测量来确定的,例如倾角、方位角和计算位移;然而,在下入套管后,大部分井眼波动会消失,因此套管离井轨迹会变得更加平滑。井筒弯曲度的这种明显变化是由套管的弯曲刚度和刚性以及沿套管柱长度的压缩和拉伸载荷引起的。随后沿着套管井轨迹进行测量,可以获得新的斜度、方位角和位移。这项新的测量记录了由套管穿过原始裸眼井眼几何形状所产生的井径波动,以及我们所说的管状波动(机械扭曲),这是特定于套管在井筒内的路径和位置的。套管对井眼轨迹的平滑掩盖了原有的井筒扭曲,导致原有的几何扭曲消失,而套管机械扭曲产生的新波动则导致额外的扭曲出现。几何扭曲度与机械扭曲度的比较,提供了一种量化消失扭曲度和显现扭曲度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1