The shift from face-to-face to remote care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative survey analysis of users of UK drug and alcohol services

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/09687637.2022.2085078
K. Hayhurst, Zoë Welch, Chris Barnes, Mark Pryke, T. Millar
{"title":"The shift from face-to-face to remote care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative survey analysis of users of UK drug and alcohol services","authors":"K. Hayhurst, Zoë Welch, Chris Barnes, Mark Pryke, T. Millar","doi":"10.1080/09687637.2022.2085078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The provision of publicly funded UK drug and alcohol services moved from a predominantly face-to-face to a remote care model in response to COVID-19. This major natural experiment can inform policy and practice in service delivery. The self-reported experiences of N = 2723 receiving remotely provided services during the pandemic were collected via an anonymous online survey. The survey was available for completion June to November 2020. Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed, using thematic analysis, at five consecutive timepoints. This allowed for information on changing perspectives and experiences to be fed back to services in real time to underpin service user-informed practice. Experiences of the switch to remote care were characterized by both positive themes: (1) feeling safe; (2) feeling supported; (3) greater convenience; (4) the positive impact of remote care on my progress, and by negative themes: (1) limits of remote care; (2) missing face-to-face care; (3) loneliness and isolation; (4) not enough support; and (5) lack of person-centered focus. Informed suggestions to improve the remote care offer, post-COVID comprised: (1) leave remote care in place; (2) increase support; (3) new models of working. Longer-term provision of remote care will be welcomed by some, but not all, service users. Work to tailor remote care to account for preferences and personal circumstances has the potential to provide greater choice and expand capacity—potentially necessary to absorb an anticipated surge in new treatment starters post-COVID.","PeriodicalId":11367,"journal":{"name":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","volume":"150 1","pages":"632 - 640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2022.2085078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The provision of publicly funded UK drug and alcohol services moved from a predominantly face-to-face to a remote care model in response to COVID-19. This major natural experiment can inform policy and practice in service delivery. The self-reported experiences of N = 2723 receiving remotely provided services during the pandemic were collected via an anonymous online survey. The survey was available for completion June to November 2020. Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed, using thematic analysis, at five consecutive timepoints. This allowed for information on changing perspectives and experiences to be fed back to services in real time to underpin service user-informed practice. Experiences of the switch to remote care were characterized by both positive themes: (1) feeling safe; (2) feeling supported; (3) greater convenience; (4) the positive impact of remote care on my progress, and by negative themes: (1) limits of remote care; (2) missing face-to-face care; (3) loneliness and isolation; (4) not enough support; and (5) lack of person-centered focus. Informed suggestions to improve the remote care offer, post-COVID comprised: (1) leave remote care in place; (2) increase support; (3) new models of working. Longer-term provision of remote care will be welcomed by some, but not all, service users. Work to tailor remote care to account for preferences and personal circumstances has the potential to provide greater choice and expand capacity—potentially necessary to absorb an anticipated surge in new treatment starters post-COVID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间从面对面到远程护理的转变:对英国药物和酒精服务用户的定性调查分析
为应对COVID-19,英国公共资助的药物和酒精服务的提供从主要的面对面护理模式转变为远程护理模式。这一重大的自然实验可以为提供服务的政策和实践提供信息。通过匿名在线调查收集了N = 2723人在大流行期间接受远程提供服务的自我报告经历。该调查将于2020年6月至11月完成。采用专题分析方法,在五个连续时间点对横断面调查数据进行分析。这使得关于不断变化的观点和经验的信息能够实时反馈给服务,从而支持服务用户知情的实践。转向远程护理的体验具有两个积极主题:(1)感觉安全;(2)感觉被支持;(3)更方便;(4)远程医疗对我的进步的积极影响和消极主题:(1)远程医疗的局限性;(2)缺少面对面的关怀;(3)孤独和孤立;(四)支持力度不够的;(5)缺乏以人为本的关注。covid - 19后改善远程医疗服务的明智建议包括:(1)保留远程医疗;(2)加大支持力度;(三)创新工作模式。长期提供远程护理将受到一些服务使用者的欢迎,但不是所有的服务使用者。根据偏好和个人情况量身定制远程护理的工作有可能提供更多选择并扩大能力——这可能是吸收covid - 19后新开始治疗的预期激增所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Drugs: education, prevention & policy is a refereed journal which aims to provide a forum for communication and debate between policy makers, practitioners and researchers concerned with social and health policy responses to legal and illicit drug use and drug-related harm. The journal publishes multi-disciplinary research papers, commentaries and reviews on policy, prevention and harm reduction issues regarding the use and misuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is journal policy to encourage submissions which reflect different cultural, historical and theoretical approaches to the development of policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Neither laissez-faire nor prohibition: the khat regulation policy preferences of people who chew khat and local social service providers in Ethiopia From subcultural to mainstream? The evolving meaning of cannabis use among youth in a restrictive policy context Reviewing the anti-doping policy of India: Missing the wood for the trees? Just have this come from their prescription pad: the medicalization of safer supply from the perspectives of health planners in BC, Canada “Availability is the poor cousin of marketing and pricing”: qualitative study of stakeholders’ views on policy priorities around tobacco and alcohol availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1