Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – a literature review and framework

N. Fawzi, Nina Steindl, Magdalena Obermaier, Fabian Prochazka, D. Arlt, Bernd Blöbaum, Marco Dohle, Katherine M. Engelke, Thomas Hanitzsch, N. Jackob, Ilka Jakobs, Tilman Klawier, Senja Post, C. Reinemann, W. Schweiger, Marc Ziegele
{"title":"Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – a literature review and framework","authors":"N. Fawzi, Nina Steindl, Magdalena Obermaier, Fabian Prochazka, D. Arlt, Bernd Blöbaum, Marco Dohle, Katherine M. Engelke, Thomas Hanitzsch, N. Jackob, Ilka Jakobs, Tilman Klawier, Senja Post, C. Reinemann, W. Schweiger, Marc Ziegele","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on trust in media is on the rise. However, communication scholars have addressed related concepts (e.g. media credibility) for decades, and these concepts have often been used interchangeably with that of trust. This practice has resulted in a confusing field of research, with studies using different labels and drawing on various theoretical backgrounds. This article aims to improve conceptual clarity. On the basis of a literature review, we first propose a broad conceptualization of trust in news media and disentangle it from related concepts. Second, we develop a framework that identifies individual- and societal-level causes and consequences of trust in various media objects. Third, we review the current state of research on social, political, and media-related correlates of trust.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"10 1","pages":"154 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on trust in media is on the rise. However, communication scholars have addressed related concepts (e.g. media credibility) for decades, and these concepts have often been used interchangeably with that of trust. This practice has resulted in a confusing field of research, with studies using different labels and drawing on various theoretical backgrounds. This article aims to improve conceptual clarity. On the basis of a literature review, we first propose a broad conceptualization of trust in news media and disentangle it from related concepts. Second, we develop a framework that identifies individual- and societal-level causes and consequences of trust in various media objects. Third, we review the current state of research on social, political, and media-related correlates of trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新闻媒体信任的概念、原因和后果——文献综述和框架
关于媒体信任的研究正在兴起。然而,传播学学者几十年来一直在研究相关概念(如媒体可信度),这些概念经常与信任互换使用。这种做法导致了一个令人困惑的研究领域,研究使用了不同的标签,并借鉴了不同的理论背景。本文旨在提高概念的清晰度。在文献回顾的基础上,我们首先提出了新闻媒体信任的广义概念,并将其从相关概念中解脱出来。其次,我们开发了一个框架来识别个人和社会层面对各种媒体对象的信任的原因和后果。第三,我们回顾了信任与社会、政治和媒体相关的研究现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Four decades of biological measurement advancing mediated communication theory: a review of literature from 1980–2020 What is ‘Being There’? an ontology of the immersive experience Relational turbulence during family transitions: a lifespan perspective and roadmap for future research An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration Mapping media literacy impact in the U.S.: a review of literature and call for equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1