Hydrological disasters in the NW-European Lowlands during the first millennium AD: a dendrochronological reconstruction

IF 1.6 2区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Netherlands Journal of Geosciences-Geologie En Mijnbouw Pub Date : 2020-09-29 DOI:10.1017/njg.2020.10
E. Jansma
{"title":"Hydrological disasters in the NW-European Lowlands during the first millennium AD: a dendrochronological reconstruction","authors":"E. Jansma","doi":"10.1017/njg.2020.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study presents an annually resolved dendrochronological reconstruction of hydrological impacts on the Roman and early-medieval landscape in the Low Countries of northwestern Europe. Around 600 hydrologically sensitive ring-width patterns, mostly oak (Quercus robur/petraea) as well as some ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and elm (Ulmus sp.), were selected from an initial dataset of >5000 and compiled into two chronologies that span the first millennium AD. Their content and (dis)similarities to established tree-ring chronologies from this and surrounding regions were used to assess their provenance, which in both cases is in the area where the majority of the wood was recovered. Instances of high groundwater levels and/or inundation were catalogued by identifying multi-year intervals of strongly reduced annual growth that occurred simultaneously throughout the research area. The resulting record contains 164 events dated between AD 1 and 1000, of which 21 have a recurrence frequency ≥50 years. One-third of the ≥50-yr events date between AD 185 and 282, making this the most flood-intense interval of the first millennium. The severest reconstructed impact of the first millennium dates to AD 602. A comparison to historically documented river floods/sea breaches and drought/heat spells shows that the predominant cause of the inferred impacts in the research area was river overflow. Synchronous inundation responses of oaks preserved in former bogs in Lower Saxony (NW Germany) indicate that half of the reconstructed events occurred on a supra-regional level, pointing to regional precipitation as a main forcing. River floods documented in written sources do not seem to have affected tree growth in Lower Saxony in a significant manner, indicating that the majority of documented floods most likely were caused by hydrological circumstances upstream of the catchments of the Rhine and/or Meuse. Reconstructed flood impacts during the Early Middle Ages coincide remarkably well with construction and repair of Rhine revetments at the early-medieval site of Leiderdorp-Plantage in the western Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":49768,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Geosciences-Geologie En Mijnbouw","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Geosciences-Geologie En Mijnbouw","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2020.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract This study presents an annually resolved dendrochronological reconstruction of hydrological impacts on the Roman and early-medieval landscape in the Low Countries of northwestern Europe. Around 600 hydrologically sensitive ring-width patterns, mostly oak (Quercus robur/petraea) as well as some ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and elm (Ulmus sp.), were selected from an initial dataset of >5000 and compiled into two chronologies that span the first millennium AD. Their content and (dis)similarities to established tree-ring chronologies from this and surrounding regions were used to assess their provenance, which in both cases is in the area where the majority of the wood was recovered. Instances of high groundwater levels and/or inundation were catalogued by identifying multi-year intervals of strongly reduced annual growth that occurred simultaneously throughout the research area. The resulting record contains 164 events dated between AD 1 and 1000, of which 21 have a recurrence frequency ≥50 years. One-third of the ≥50-yr events date between AD 185 and 282, making this the most flood-intense interval of the first millennium. The severest reconstructed impact of the first millennium dates to AD 602. A comparison to historically documented river floods/sea breaches and drought/heat spells shows that the predominant cause of the inferred impacts in the research area was river overflow. Synchronous inundation responses of oaks preserved in former bogs in Lower Saxony (NW Germany) indicate that half of the reconstructed events occurred on a supra-regional level, pointing to regional precipitation as a main forcing. River floods documented in written sources do not seem to have affected tree growth in Lower Saxony in a significant manner, indicating that the majority of documented floods most likely were caused by hydrological circumstances upstream of the catchments of the Rhine and/or Meuse. Reconstructed flood impacts during the Early Middle Ages coincide remarkably well with construction and repair of Rhine revetments at the early-medieval site of Leiderdorp-Plantage in the western Netherlands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西元一千年欧洲西北部低地的水文灾害:树木年代学重建
摘要:本研究提出了在西北欧低地国家的罗马和中世纪早期景观的水文影响的年度解决树木年代学重建。大约600个水文敏感的环宽度模式,主要是橡树(Quercus robur/ pepeea),以及一些梣树(Fraxinus excelsior)和榆树(Ulmus sp.),从超过5000的初始数据集中选择,并汇编成跨越公元第一个千年的两个年表。它们的含量和与该地区及周边地区已建立的树木年轮年表的(非)相似性被用来评估它们的来源,在这两种情况下,它们都是在大部分木材被回收的地区。通过确定在整个研究区域同时发生的年增长率大幅下降的多年间隔,对地下水位高和/或淹没的实例进行了分类。所得到的记录包含164个事件,时间在公元1年至1000年之间,其中21个事件的复发频率≥50年。在≥50年的事件中,有三分之一发生在公元185年至282年之间,这是第一个千年中洪水最密集的时期。第一个千年最严重的重建影响发生在公元602年。与历史记录的河流洪水/海口和干旱/高温期的比较表明,研究区域推断影响的主要原因是河流溢出。德国下萨克森州(Lower Saxony)前沼泽中保存的栎树的同步淹没响应表明,重建的事件中有一半发生在超区域层面,表明区域降水是主要的强迫因素。书面资料记载的河流洪水似乎并没有对下萨克森州的树木生长产生重大影响,这表明大多数记录在案的洪水很可能是由莱茵河和/或默兹河流域上游的水文环境造成的。中世纪早期重建的洪水影响与荷兰西部莱德多普-普兰塔奇中世纪早期莱茵河护岸的建设和修复非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
25.90%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw is a fully open access journal which publishes papers on all aspects of geoscience, providing they are of international interest and quality. As the official publication of the ''Netherlands Journal of Geosciences'' Foundation the journal publishes new and significant research in geosciences with a regional focus on the Netherlands, the North Sea region and relevant adjacent areas. A wide range of topics within the geosciences are covered in the journal, including "geology, physical geography, geophyics, (geo-)archeology, paleontology, hydro(geo)logy, hydrocarbon exploration, modelling and visualisation." The journal is a continuation of Geologie and Mijnbouw (published by the Royal Geological and Mining Society of the Netherlands, KNGMG) and Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen (published by TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands). The journal is published in full colour.
期刊最新文献
A cyclostratigraphic framework of the Upper Carboniferous Westoe and Cleaver formations in the southern North Sea Basin as a methodology for stratigraphic reservoir characterisation Investigating seismicity rates with Coulomb failure stress models caused by pore pressure and thermal stress from operating a well doublet in a generic geothermal reservoir in the Netherlands Comparison of hydrocarbon and geothermal energy production in the Netherlands: reservoir characteristics, pressure and temperature changes, and implications for fault reactivation The first report of Chelonioidea cf. Ctenochelys from the Late Cretaceous of the Maastrichtian type area The influence of subsurface architecture on scour hole formation in the Rhine–Meuse delta, the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1