Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value to Predict Locoregional Invasion and Systemic Metastasis in Cervical Cancer.

Ezel Yaltırık Bilgin
{"title":"Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value to Predict Locoregional Invasion and Systemic Metastasis in Cervical Cancer.","authors":"Ezel Yaltırık Bilgin","doi":"10.14744/hnhj.2022.32858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We questioned the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the presence of locoregional invasion and systemic metastases in patients with cervical cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of ADC values in predicting tumor cellularity and aggressiveness. Methods: Forty patients with histopathologically proven cervical cancer diagnosis who applied to our center between January 2018 and January 2022 were evaluated retrospectively and included in the study. ADC values were measured from the ADC maps created from the diffusion-weighted images of the patients. In addition, invasion of adjacent organs (bladder-rectum) was evaluated with pelvic magnetic resonance examination (MRI) and distant organ metastases were evaluated, primarily by PET-CT and, if any, other scanning methods (brain MRI, bone scintigraphy) at the time of diagnosis. Results: The mean ADC value of patients with locoregional invasion was found to be 0.89×10–3 mm 2 /s, and the mean ADC value of patients without locoregional invasion was 0.96×10–3 mm 2 /s. Although the mean ADC value of the patients with locoregional invasion was lower than the patients who were not detected, this difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.466). The mean ADC value of patients with systemic metastasis was 0.73×10–3 mm 2 /s, and the mean ADC value of patients without systemic metastasis was 0.96×10–3 mm 2 /s. The mean ADC value of patients with systemic metastasis was found to be low, close to the statistical significance level (t=1.954, p=0.058). As a result of ROC analysis, the most appropriate cutoff limit for ADC value for systemic organ metastasis was found to be 0.93 (sensitivity=59% and specificity=83%). Discussion and Conclusion: Systemic metastasis risk and poor prognosis can be predicted by diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC values.","PeriodicalId":12831,"journal":{"name":"Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Medical Journal","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2022.32858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We questioned the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the presence of locoregional invasion and systemic metastases in patients with cervical cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of ADC values in predicting tumor cellularity and aggressiveness. Methods: Forty patients with histopathologically proven cervical cancer diagnosis who applied to our center between January 2018 and January 2022 were evaluated retrospectively and included in the study. ADC values were measured from the ADC maps created from the diffusion-weighted images of the patients. In addition, invasion of adjacent organs (bladder-rectum) was evaluated with pelvic magnetic resonance examination (MRI) and distant organ metastases were evaluated, primarily by PET-CT and, if any, other scanning methods (brain MRI, bone scintigraphy) at the time of diagnosis. Results: The mean ADC value of patients with locoregional invasion was found to be 0.89×10–3 mm 2 /s, and the mean ADC value of patients without locoregional invasion was 0.96×10–3 mm 2 /s. Although the mean ADC value of the patients with locoregional invasion was lower than the patients who were not detected, this difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.466). The mean ADC value of patients with systemic metastasis was 0.73×10–3 mm 2 /s, and the mean ADC value of patients without systemic metastasis was 0.96×10–3 mm 2 /s. The mean ADC value of patients with systemic metastasis was found to be low, close to the statistical significance level (t=1.954, p=0.058). As a result of ROC analysis, the most appropriate cutoff limit for ADC value for systemic organ metastasis was found to be 0.93 (sensitivity=59% and specificity=83%). Discussion and Conclusion: Systemic metastasis risk and poor prognosis can be predicted by diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表观扩散系数值在预测宫颈癌局部浸润和全身转移中的作用。
简介:我们对宫颈癌患者的表观扩散系数(ADC)值与局部浸润和全身转移之间的关系提出了质疑。我们的目的是评估ADC值在预测肿瘤细胞性和侵袭性方面的作用。方法:回顾性评估2018年1月至2022年1月期间申请本中心的40例经组织病理学证实诊断为宫颈癌的患者并纳入本研究。ADC值由患者弥散加权图像生成的ADC图测量。此外,通过盆腔磁共振检查(MRI)评估邻近器官(膀胱-直肠)的侵犯,主要通过PET-CT评估远处器官转移,如果有的话,在诊断时通过其他扫描方法(脑MRI,骨显像)评估。结果:局部侵犯患者的ADC平均值为0.89×10-3 mm 2 /s,无局部侵犯患者的ADC平均值为0.96×10-3 mm 2 /s。虽然局部侵袭患者的平均ADC值低于未检出患者,但两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.466)。有全身转移的患者ADC平均值为0.73×10-3 mm 2 /s,无全身转移的患者ADC平均值为0.96×10-3 mm 2 /s。系统性转移患者的平均ADC值较低,接近统计学显著水平(t=1.954, p=0.058)。通过ROC分析,发现ADC值对于系统性器官转移最合适的临界值为0.93(敏感性为59%,特异性为83%)。讨论与结论:通过弥散加权成像和ADC值可以预测全身转移风险和预后不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational Hand Injuries and Third-line University Hospital Emergency Department Admissions in Istanbul Evaluation of the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback training in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome Why do parents choose to attend the emergency department? A Cross-sectional study Retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar herniectomy surgery Retrospective evaluation of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1