On the Genealogy of the Modern Experience of Consciousness. Christian Self-Examination

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia Pub Date : 2022-05-09 DOI:10.18778/1689-4286.55.01
Szymon Wawrzyniak
{"title":"On the Genealogy of the Modern Experience of Consciousness. Christian Self-Examination","authors":"Szymon Wawrzyniak","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.55.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to investigate the modern self-experience of an individual from the point of view of the historical conditions that make this experience possible. This undertaking will be supported by the turn to a theory and practice of self-examination as it appears in early Christianity. It is widely recognized that there is a connection between modernity and subjectivity. One of the areas where it is reflected is philosophy. By founding the paradigm of modern philosophy, Descartes finds in his turn to himself a certain basis of cognition and a space where forward progress in the process of building a new system of knowledge may take effect. For Descartes consciousness is, however, a means, not an end. This is one of the reasons why it is not \"questioned\" sufficiently. Among many questions that were not addressed at all for a long time, one should mention, how the experience on which Descartes bases his reasoning became possible. In the history preceding the Cartesian turn inward, we can identify many interesting moments - which can be found with great confirmation in early Christianity - that play a significant role in the constitution of the experience that will become so important for modernity.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.55.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to investigate the modern self-experience of an individual from the point of view of the historical conditions that make this experience possible. This undertaking will be supported by the turn to a theory and practice of self-examination as it appears in early Christianity. It is widely recognized that there is a connection between modernity and subjectivity. One of the areas where it is reflected is philosophy. By founding the paradigm of modern philosophy, Descartes finds in his turn to himself a certain basis of cognition and a space where forward progress in the process of building a new system of knowledge may take effect. For Descartes consciousness is, however, a means, not an end. This is one of the reasons why it is not "questioned" sufficiently. Among many questions that were not addressed at all for a long time, one should mention, how the experience on which Descartes bases his reasoning became possible. In the history preceding the Cartesian turn inward, we can identify many interesting moments - which can be found with great confirmation in early Christianity - that play a significant role in the constitution of the experience that will become so important for modernity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论现代意识经验的谱系。基督教的自我检查
本文旨在从使个体的现代自我体验成为可能的历史条件的角度来考察个体的现代自我体验。这一事业将得到早期基督教中出现的自我反省理论和实践的支持。人们普遍认为现代性与主体性之间存在着联系。它反映的一个领域是哲学。通过建立现代哲学的范式,笛卡尔为自己找到了一定的认知基础和空间,在构建新的知识体系的过程中取得了进步。然而,对笛卡尔来说,意识是一种手段,而不是目的。这就是它没有被充分“质疑”的原因之一。在许多长期未被提及的问题中,有一个应该提到,笛卡尔的推理所依据的经验是如何成为可能的。在笛卡尔转向内敛之前的历史中,我们可以发现许多有趣的时刻——这些时刻在早期基督教中得到了极大的证实——它们在构成对现代性至关重要的经验中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teologiczne konsekwencje darwinizmu — „Bóg Darwina” Corneliusa G. Huntera Co to za świat? The Limits of Liberalism. Tradition, Individualism, and the crisis of freedom, Mark. T. Mitchell, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 2019, ss. 328 – Artykuł Recenzyjny Teoria interpretacji Paula Ricoeura i Hansa-Georga Gadamera. Analiza porównawcza Ideologia w edukacji. Spojrzenie opisowe, negatywne i pozytywne na przykładzie wybranych stanowisk pedagogiki katolickiej i krytycznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1