The Effect of an Asymmetric Energy Window on Bone Scintigraphy Image Quality

J. Machado, S. Doshi, R. Smith, M. Evans, R. Graham, S. Redman, D. Little
{"title":"The Effect of an Asymmetric Energy Window on Bone Scintigraphy Image Quality","authors":"J. Machado, S. Doshi, R. Smith, M. Evans, R. Graham, S. Redman, D. Little","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.119.233577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bone scintigraphy is one of the most common nuclear medicine tests. Previous work investigated the effectiveness of an asymmetric window (ASW) for planar bone scintigraphy using simulation and phantom data. Phantom studies concluded that the ASW improved both the resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio when imaging objects with high scatter. The aim of this study was to confirm this improvement increased image quality in patients. This study also investigated whether the differences between a symmetric window (SW) and an ASW depended on body mass index. Methods: Fifty-eight patients had 2 scans: a standard scan using an SW of 140 keV ± 10% and a scan using an ASW of 140 keV + 10% and − 7.5%. Three readers independently compared the 2 image sets and scored them using a 5-score scale (ranging from 1 = ASW better [clinically important] to 5 = SW better [clinically important]). Scores from all radiologists were pooled and analyzed statistically. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In 93 cases (53%), the readers scored the ASW images better than the SW images. In 5 cases (3%), the ASW images were preferred, with the difference considered clinically important; there were no cases in which the SW was similarly preferred. For the sign test, we determined whether the total of 93 scores of 1 or 2 (ASW preferred) was significantly different from the 15 scores of 4 or 5 (SW preferred). The P value was less than 0.00001, demonstrating that the difference was significant. Conclusion: In patients undergoing bone scintigraphy, ASW provided an improvement in image quality that in some cases was judged clinically important.","PeriodicalId":22799,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","volume":"6 1","pages":"46 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.233577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bone scintigraphy is one of the most common nuclear medicine tests. Previous work investigated the effectiveness of an asymmetric window (ASW) for planar bone scintigraphy using simulation and phantom data. Phantom studies concluded that the ASW improved both the resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio when imaging objects with high scatter. The aim of this study was to confirm this improvement increased image quality in patients. This study also investigated whether the differences between a symmetric window (SW) and an ASW depended on body mass index. Methods: Fifty-eight patients had 2 scans: a standard scan using an SW of 140 keV ± 10% and a scan using an ASW of 140 keV + 10% and − 7.5%. Three readers independently compared the 2 image sets and scored them using a 5-score scale (ranging from 1 = ASW better [clinically important] to 5 = SW better [clinically important]). Scores from all radiologists were pooled and analyzed statistically. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In 93 cases (53%), the readers scored the ASW images better than the SW images. In 5 cases (3%), the ASW images were preferred, with the difference considered clinically important; there were no cases in which the SW was similarly preferred. For the sign test, we determined whether the total of 93 scores of 1 or 2 (ASW preferred) was significantly different from the 15 scores of 4 or 5 (SW preferred). The P value was less than 0.00001, demonstrating that the difference was significant. Conclusion: In patients undergoing bone scintigraphy, ASW provided an improvement in image quality that in some cases was judged clinically important.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不对称能量窗对骨闪烁成像质量的影响
骨显像是最常用的核医学检查之一。以前的工作研究了非对称窗口(ASW)对平面骨闪烁成像的有效性,使用模拟和幻影数据。幻影研究得出结论,在对高散射目标成像时,ASW提高了分辨率和噪比。本研究的目的是证实这种改善提高了患者的图像质量。本研究还调查了对称窗(SW)和对称窗(ASW)之间的差异是否取决于体重指数。方法:58例患者进行了2次扫描:标准扫描,SW为140 keV±10%,ASW为140 keV + 10%和- 7.5%。三位读者独立比较了两组图像,并使用5分制对它们进行评分(从1 = ASW更好[临床重要]到5 = SW更好[临床重要])。所有放射科医生的评分被汇总并进行统计分析。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:93例(53%)读者对ASW图像的评分高于SW图像。5例(3%)首选ASW图像,其差异被认为具有临床重要性;没有类似的情况下,SW更受青睐。对于符号检验,我们确定93分1或2分(ASW优先)与15分4或5分(SW优先)是否有显著差异。P值小于0.00001,说明差异有统计学意义。结论:在接受骨显像的患者中,ASW提供了图像质量的改善,在某些情况下被认为是临床重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Stability Matters: Radiochemical Stability of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-PSMA I&T Small-Bowel and Colon Transit SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicated γ-Cameras SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists: Clinical Research Primer—Regulatory Process, Part II: The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Food and Drug Administration–Regulated Radiopharmaceutical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1