The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication

D. Grayson, L. Coventry
{"title":"The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication","authors":"D. Grayson, L. Coventry","doi":"10.1145/565711.565713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the simplest examples of non-verbal communication is that of proximity, i.e. the distance at which conversants stand (or sit) from each other when interacting. This is known to be guided by certain social rules which take into account personal relationships, culture, personality and the purpose of the discussion, violation of which leads to various psychological and behavioural effects.One such effect is persuasion. Sales people will tend to approach customers closer than other business people. Video has in the past been shown to lead to more effective negotiation and bargaining than audio only conditions in experimental tasks. So far though, it remains unknown whether or not similar effects of proximity exist within video-mediated communication --- or indeed even whether or not proximity can be conveyed through video. This study investigates the role of the proxemic information within the video image in a formal persuasion environment using both subjective and objective measures of attitude and behaviour.A simulation of a customer seeking financial advice from an advisor across a live video link had two proxemic conditions --- the image of the advisor appearing either very close or far away. Subjective impressions of both the task and technology were analysed by questionnaire and showed no subjective differences between conditions. Structural analysis of the dialogues however, indicated customers to be more interactive in the close condition. When the advisor appeared close the customer spoke more often, said more, took longer and made more instances of overlapping speech. The similarity between these results and those of familiarity studies are discussed and a hypothesis of perceived close proximity resulting in perceived familiarity is offered.The study shows that proxemic information is preserved in video conferencing and produces effects similar to those of face-to-face interactions but less pronounced. This is explained by the video conveying only visual proxemic information compared to the multimodal information available in face-to-face interaction.","PeriodicalId":7397,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/565711.565713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

One of the simplest examples of non-verbal communication is that of proximity, i.e. the distance at which conversants stand (or sit) from each other when interacting. This is known to be guided by certain social rules which take into account personal relationships, culture, personality and the purpose of the discussion, violation of which leads to various psychological and behavioural effects.One such effect is persuasion. Sales people will tend to approach customers closer than other business people. Video has in the past been shown to lead to more effective negotiation and bargaining than audio only conditions in experimental tasks. So far though, it remains unknown whether or not similar effects of proximity exist within video-mediated communication --- or indeed even whether or not proximity can be conveyed through video. This study investigates the role of the proxemic information within the video image in a formal persuasion environment using both subjective and objective measures of attitude and behaviour.A simulation of a customer seeking financial advice from an advisor across a live video link had two proxemic conditions --- the image of the advisor appearing either very close or far away. Subjective impressions of both the task and technology were analysed by questionnaire and showed no subjective differences between conditions. Structural analysis of the dialogues however, indicated customers to be more interactive in the close condition. When the advisor appeared close the customer spoke more often, said more, took longer and made more instances of overlapping speech. The similarity between these results and those of familiarity studies are discussed and a hypothesis of perceived close proximity resulting in perceived familiarity is offered.The study shows that proxemic information is preserved in video conferencing and produces effects similar to those of face-to-face interactions but less pronounced. This is explained by the video conveying only visual proxemic information compared to the multimodal information available in face-to-face interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉邻域信息在视频媒介交流中的作用
非语言交流的一个最简单的例子是近距离,即在交流时,交谈者站(或坐)彼此之间的距离。众所周知,这是受某些社会规则的指导,这些规则考虑到个人关系、文化、个性和讨论的目的,违反这些规则会导致各种心理和行为影响。其中一种效果就是说服。销售人员倾向于比其他商务人士更接近客户。在过去的实验任务中,视频被证明比音频条件更能有效地进行谈判和讨价还价。然而,到目前为止,我们还不清楚在视频媒介的交流中是否存在类似的接近效应,甚至不知道是否可以通过视频来传达接近。本研究使用主观和客观的态度和行为测量来调查在正式说服环境中视频图像中的邻近信息的作用。模拟客户通过实时视频链接向顾问寻求财务建议,有两种近距离条件——顾问的图像要么很近,要么很远。通过问卷调查对任务和技术的主观印象进行了分析,结果表明不同条件下的主观印象没有差异。然而,对对话的结构分析表明,顾客在近距离的情况下更具互动性。当顾问出现在顾客身边时,顾客说得更频繁,说得更多,花的时间更长,说话重叠的例子也更多。讨论了这些结果与熟悉度研究结果之间的相似性,并提出了感知接近导致感知熟悉的假设。研究表明,在视频会议中,邻域信息被保留下来,产生的效果与面对面交流类似,但不那么明显。这可以解释为,与面对面互动中提供的多模式信息相比,视频只传递视觉邻近信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students Coordinating user interfaces for consistency Universal commands for telephony-based spoken language systems The magic of visual interaction design On sharing resources and donating books: What are we doing wrong? Is this the bull-in-a-china-shop syndrome?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1