The Welfare Effects of Persuasion and Taxation: Theory and Evidence from the Field

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EJournal of Tax Research Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3587339
Matthias Rodemeier, A. Löschel
{"title":"The Welfare Effects of Persuasion and Taxation: Theory and Evidence from the Field","authors":"Matthias Rodemeier, A. Löschel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3587339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How much information should governments reveal to consumers if consumption choices have uninternalized consequences to society? How does an alternative tax policy compare to information disclosure? We develop a price theoretic model of information design that allows empiricists to identify the welfare effects of any arbitrary information policy. Based on this model, we run a natural field experiment in cooperation with a large European appliance retailer and randomize information regarding the financial benefits of energy-efficient household lighting among more than 640,000 subjects. We find that full information disclosure strongly decreases demand for energy efficiency, while partial information disclosure increases demand. More information reduces social welfare because the increase in consumer surplus is outweighed by the rise in environmental externalities. By randomizing product prices, we identify the optimal tax vector as an alternative policy and show that sizable taxes on energy-inefficient products yield larger welfare gains than any information policy. We also document an important policy interaction: information provision dramatically reduces attention to pecuniary incentives and thereby limits the effectiveness of taxes.","PeriodicalId":54058,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Tax Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

How much information should governments reveal to consumers if consumption choices have uninternalized consequences to society? How does an alternative tax policy compare to information disclosure? We develop a price theoretic model of information design that allows empiricists to identify the welfare effects of any arbitrary information policy. Based on this model, we run a natural field experiment in cooperation with a large European appliance retailer and randomize information regarding the financial benefits of energy-efficient household lighting among more than 640,000 subjects. We find that full information disclosure strongly decreases demand for energy efficiency, while partial information disclosure increases demand. More information reduces social welfare because the increase in consumer surplus is outweighed by the rise in environmental externalities. By randomizing product prices, we identify the optimal tax vector as an alternative policy and show that sizable taxes on energy-inefficient products yield larger welfare gains than any information policy. We also document an important policy interaction: information provision dramatically reduces attention to pecuniary incentives and thereby limits the effectiveness of taxes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说服与税收的福利效应:理论与实证
如果消费选择对社会产生非内化后果,政府应该向消费者披露多少信息?替代性税收政策与信息披露相比如何?我们开发了一个信息设计的价格理论模型,它允许经验主义者识别任何任意信息政策的福利效应。在此模型的基础上,我们与欧洲一家大型家电零售商合作进行了一项自然现场实验,并在64万多名受试者中随机收集了有关节能家用照明经济效益的信息。我们发现,完全信息披露会强烈降低能效需求,而部分信息披露会增加能效需求。更多的信息减少了社会福利,因为消费者剩余的增加被环境外部性的增加所抵消。通过随机化产品价格,我们确定了最优税收向量作为替代政策,并表明对能源效率低下的产品征收可观的税收比任何信息政策产生更大的福利收益。我们还记录了一个重要的政策互动:信息提供大大减少了对金钱激励的关注,从而限制了税收的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Democracy Avoidance in Tax Lawmaking Recent Administrative and Judicial Developments in IRS Appeals Policy Forum: Promoting Tax Compliance by Regulating the Digital Economy - Quebec's Uber Initiative Supporting Small Businesses in Place Thinking Like a Source State in a Digital Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1