Los cabilderos, Washington y la Constitución de 1917

M. Collado
{"title":"Los cabilderos, Washington y la Constitución de 1917","authors":"M. Collado","doi":"10.15460/JBLA.54.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the arguments used by American lobbyists to pressure Washington to oppose against the Mexican Constitution of 1917 or articles that affected the interests of miners, oil companies, landowners and merchants in Mexico between 1916 and 1921. These attempts did not prevail, since both the State Department and the White House put national interests ahead of the private interests of investors south of the border during World War I. However, the lobbyists demands did have an impact on foreign policy when America's position was modified at the end of the war. Ultimately the US government did not adopt the interventionism proposed by the hardliners, who insisted on repealing the Constitution or modifying some of its articles, but instead used diplomatic pressure to defend the interests of its fellow citizens in Mexico.","PeriodicalId":52370,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbuch fuer Geschichte Lateinamerikas/Anuario de Historia de Amrica Latina","volume":"173 1","pages":"61-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbuch fuer Geschichte Lateinamerikas/Anuario de Historia de Amrica Latina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/JBLA.54.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the arguments used by American lobbyists to pressure Washington to oppose against the Mexican Constitution of 1917 or articles that affected the interests of miners, oil companies, landowners and merchants in Mexico between 1916 and 1921. These attempts did not prevail, since both the State Department and the White House put national interests ahead of the private interests of investors south of the border during World War I. However, the lobbyists demands did have an impact on foreign policy when America's position was modified at the end of the war. Ultimately the US government did not adopt the interventionism proposed by the hardliners, who insisted on repealing the Constitution or modifying some of its articles, but instead used diplomatic pressure to defend the interests of its fellow citizens in Mexico.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说客、华盛顿和1917年宪法
本文分析了美国游说者用来向华盛顿施压反对1917年墨西哥宪法的论据,以及1916年至1921年间影响墨西哥矿工、石油公司、土地所有者和商人利益的条款。这些尝试并没有取得成功,因为在第一次世界大战期间,国务院和白宫都把国家利益置于边境以南投资者的私人利益之上。然而,当美国在战争结束时改变立场时,游说者的要求确实对外交政策产生了影响。最终,美国政府没有采纳强硬派提出的干涉主义,他们坚持废除宪法或修改部分条款,而是通过外交压力来捍卫墨西哥同胞的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender, Health, and Medicine in Latin America - Introduction Derecho a la salud y cuidados en el acceso a medicamentos antirretrovirales: el reclamo de las mujeres según archivos del Estado argentino durante la crisis del año 2002 La paradoja arbitral: cuestiones de límites y "cultura de las pretensiones territoriales" en Hispanoamérica Between Women: Female Health Workers and the Struggle to Transform Diets in Rural Mexico, 1920-1960 Manifestaciones de violencia contra las mujeres, Argentina (1880-1910)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1