Depth of Cure, Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Dual-Cure Bulk-Fill Composites

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.15517/ijds.2022.52970
Ayca Sarialioglu Gungor, A. Durmuş, B. Zengin Kurt, Safiye Selin Köymen, N. Dönmez
{"title":"Depth of Cure, Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Dual-Cure Bulk-Fill Composites","authors":"Ayca Sarialioglu Gungor, A. Durmuş, B. Zengin Kurt, Safiye Selin Köymen, N. Dönmez","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.52970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated selected structural and physical properties, such as degree of conversion (DC), Vickers hardness (VHN), and compression strength (CS), of three new dual-cure bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs; ACTIVA, HyperFIL, and Fill-Up) and compared them to those of a conventional RBC (Filtek Z250) at three clinically relevant depths. Samples (n=180) were prepared in three depths (2,4, and 6mm). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and VHN and CS tests were performed. The DC value was calculated by considering the relative change in the aliphatic C=C peaks. The fractured surfaces of representative samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni tests (p<0.05). According to the VHN results, Filtek Z250 showed the highest bottom/top hardness ratio (97.94±1.01) at 2mm thickness and ACTIVA showed the lowest bottom/top hardness ratio (43.48±5.64) at 6mm thickness (p<0.001). According to the FTIR results, the DC decreased with increasing thickness in all materials (p<0.05). Filtek Z250 showed the highest (301±12.4 MPa) and ACTIVA exhibited the lowest (232±17.2 MPa) CS values at 2mm thickness (p<0.05). The lowest CS values were obtained for ACTIVA, and the highest values were obtained for Filtek Z250 for samples with thicknesses of 4 and 6mm, respectively (p<0.05). The structural features of restorative composites, such as the resin chemistry and filler type and content, and the operational parameters (i.e., material thickness and curing conditions) strongly affect crosslinking reactions and thus the DC, VHN, and CS values.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.52970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated selected structural and physical properties, such as degree of conversion (DC), Vickers hardness (VHN), and compression strength (CS), of three new dual-cure bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs; ACTIVA, HyperFIL, and Fill-Up) and compared them to those of a conventional RBC (Filtek Z250) at three clinically relevant depths. Samples (n=180) were prepared in three depths (2,4, and 6mm). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and VHN and CS tests were performed. The DC value was calculated by considering the relative change in the aliphatic C=C peaks. The fractured surfaces of representative samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni tests (p<0.05). According to the VHN results, Filtek Z250 showed the highest bottom/top hardness ratio (97.94±1.01) at 2mm thickness and ACTIVA showed the lowest bottom/top hardness ratio (43.48±5.64) at 6mm thickness (p<0.001). According to the FTIR results, the DC decreased with increasing thickness in all materials (p<0.05). Filtek Z250 showed the highest (301±12.4 MPa) and ACTIVA exhibited the lowest (232±17.2 MPa) CS values at 2mm thickness (p<0.05). The lowest CS values were obtained for ACTIVA, and the highest values were obtained for Filtek Z250 for samples with thicknesses of 4 and 6mm, respectively (p<0.05). The structural features of restorative composites, such as the resin chemistry and filler type and content, and the operational parameters (i.e., material thickness and curing conditions) strongly affect crosslinking reactions and thus the DC, VHN, and CS values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双固化大块填充复合材料的固化深度、力学性能和形貌
本研究评估了三种新型双固化大块填充树脂基复合材料的结构和物理性能,如转化率(DC)、维氏硬度(VHN)和抗压强度(CS)。ACTIVA, HyperFIL和fill - fill),并将其与常规RBC (Filtek Z250)在三个临床相关深度进行比较。样品(n=180)在3个深度(2、4和6mm)制备。傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)分析、VHN和CS测试。考虑脂肪族C=C峰的相对变化来计算DC值。采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对代表性样品的断裂表面进行了表征。采用双向方差分析和事后Bonferroni检验对数据进行统计学评价(p<0.05)。VHN结果显示,Filtek Z250在2mm厚度时底/顶硬度比最高(97.94±1.01),ACTIVA在6mm厚度时底/顶硬度比最低(43.48±5.64)(p<0.001)。FTIR结果显示,各材料的DC随厚度的增加而降低(p<0.05)。在2mm厚度下,Filtek Z250的CS值最高(301±12.4 MPa), ACTIVA的CS值最低(232±17.2 MPa) (p<0.05)。在样品厚度为4 mm和6mm时,ACTIVA的CS值最低,Filtek Z250的CS值最高(p<0.05)。恢复性复合材料的结构特征,如树脂化学、填料类型和含量,以及操作参数(即材料厚度和固化条件)强烈影响交联反应,从而影响DC、VHN和CS值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current Perspective on Fiberglass Posts Length: Finite Element Study Uses of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels in Dentistry: A Systematic Review Sodium Hypochlorite in Endodontic Therapy: Immutable Hero or Imminent Threat? Exploring the Complexities of Temporomandibular Joint Function and Dysfunction: A Contemporary Review Factors Associated with the Perception of Prehospital Internship Training of Dental and Other Health Sciences Students in the COVID-19 Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1