Effect of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure: a cohort study

T. Viarasilpa, S. Tongyoo, C. Permpikul
{"title":"Effect of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure: a cohort study","authors":"T. Viarasilpa, S. Tongyoo, C. Permpikul","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v29i.253581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Tuberculosis (TB) remains an important and evolving health problem worldwide. Acute respiratory failure, the most severe form of pulmonary tuberculosis, is associated with a high mortality rate. Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy has been reported as an effective treatment in extrapulmonary TB. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure.\n\nMethods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during January 2011 to December 2013. Patients that received corticosteroid as an adjunctive treatment for pulmonary TB were assigned to the steroid group. The control group consisted of patients that did not receive corticosteroid. Collected data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, vital signs, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, chest X-ray abnormality pattern, and TB treatment strategies, including antituberculosis agents and adjunct corticosteroid treatment. The primary outcome was hospital mortality rate. The secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.\n\nResults: Thirty-eight patients were included. There were 18 patients in the steroid group and 20 in the control group. No significant difference was observed between groups for age, gender, BMI, APACHE II score, vital signs, or PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Patients in the steroid group had a significantly higher mean SOFA score than controls (5.7±4.5 vs. 3.3±2.6, respectively; p=0.046). Almost all patients in this study (97.1%) had positive culture for M. tuberculosis from sputum. The mean corticosteroid dose was equivalent to hydrocortisone 329.7±146.0 mg/day. Patients in the steroid group had higher hospital mortality than control group patients, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (66.7% vs. 45.0%, respectively; p=0.21). Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy did not significantly reduce hospital length of stay or duration of mechanical ventilation when compared between the steroid and control groups (12.0±13.3 vs. 14.6±19.3 days, respectively; p=0.636 and 7.2±10.6 vs. 8.0±8.3 days, respectively; p=0.801).\n\nConclusion: Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy had no significant positive effect on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure.","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v29i.253581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Tuberculosis (TB) remains an important and evolving health problem worldwide. Acute respiratory failure, the most severe form of pulmonary tuberculosis, is associated with a high mortality rate. Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy has been reported as an effective treatment in extrapulmonary TB. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during January 2011 to December 2013. Patients that received corticosteroid as an adjunctive treatment for pulmonary TB were assigned to the steroid group. The control group consisted of patients that did not receive corticosteroid. Collected data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, vital signs, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, chest X-ray abnormality pattern, and TB treatment strategies, including antituberculosis agents and adjunct corticosteroid treatment. The primary outcome was hospital mortality rate. The secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. There were 18 patients in the steroid group and 20 in the control group. No significant difference was observed between groups for age, gender, BMI, APACHE II score, vital signs, or PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Patients in the steroid group had a significantly higher mean SOFA score than controls (5.7±4.5 vs. 3.3±2.6, respectively; p=0.046). Almost all patients in this study (97.1%) had positive culture for M. tuberculosis from sputum. The mean corticosteroid dose was equivalent to hydrocortisone 329.7±146.0 mg/day. Patients in the steroid group had higher hospital mortality than control group patients, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (66.7% vs. 45.0%, respectively; p=0.21). Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy did not significantly reduce hospital length of stay or duration of mechanical ventilation when compared between the steroid and control groups (12.0±13.3 vs. 14.6±19.3 days, respectively; p=0.636 and 7.2±10.6 vs. 8.0±8.3 days, respectively; p=0.801). Conclusion: Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy had no significant positive effect on outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助皮质类固醇治疗对肺结核合并急性呼吸衰竭患者预后的影响:一项队列研究
背景:结核病(TB)仍然是世界范围内一个重要的和不断发展的健康问题。急性呼吸衰竭是肺结核的最严重形式,与高死亡率有关。据报道,辅助皮质类固醇治疗是肺外结核的有效治疗方法。本研究的目的是探讨辅助皮质类固醇治疗对肺结核合并急性呼吸衰竭患者预后的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2011年1月至2013年12月在泰国曼谷Siriraj医院收治的新诊断的急性呼吸衰竭肺结核患者。接受皮质类固醇作为肺结核辅助治疗的患者被分配到类固醇组。对照组由未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者组成。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、生命体征、PaO2/FiO2比率、胸部x线异常模式和结核病治疗策略,包括抗结核药物和辅助皮质类固醇治疗。主要终点是医院死亡率。次要结果为住院时间和机械通气时间。结果:纳入38例患者。类固醇治疗组18例,对照组20例。各组间年龄、性别、BMI、APACHE II评分、生命体征、PaO2/FiO2比值均无显著差异。类固醇组患者的平均SOFA评分显著高于对照组(分别为5.7±4.5 vs 3.3±2.6);p = 0.046)。本研究中几乎所有患者(97.1%)痰中结核分枝杆菌培养阳性。平均皮质类固醇剂量相当于氢化可的松329.7±146.0 mg/天。类固醇组患者住院死亡率高于对照组患者,但差异无统计学意义(分别为66.7%比45.0%;p = 0.21)。与类固醇组和对照组相比,辅助皮质类固醇治疗没有显著减少住院时间或机械通气持续时间(分别为12.0±13.3天和14.6±19.3天);P =0.636, P = 7.2±10.6,P = 8.0±8.3;p = 0.801)。结论:皮质类固醇辅助治疗对肺结核合并急性呼吸衰竭患者预后无显著积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geo–economic variations in care for invasively ventilated patients: The potential benefits of closed–loop ventilation in resource–limited settings Effect of sepsis protocol in inpatient departments triggered by Ramathibodi Early Warning Score (REWS) on treatment processes Practical points of hemoperfusion in the intensive care unit Use of Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) during Vascular Occlusion Test (VOT) for predicting an increase in oxygen consumption after fluid challenge in circulatory shock patients Right ventricular failure due to acute pulmonary embolism associated with Graves’ disease: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1