Comparison of The Effectiveness of Face -to- Face and Virtual Training of Basic Cognitive Skills in Mental Rehabilitation Day Care Centers during Covid-19 Pandemic Time

Leyla Rastgar Farajzadeh, M. Asghari jafarabadi, Mohsen Alirezaei Hoor, nazila Broumand Esfangareh
{"title":"Comparison of The Effectiveness of Face -to- Face and Virtual Training of Basic Cognitive Skills in Mental Rehabilitation Day Care Centers during Covid-19 Pandemic Time","authors":"Leyla Rastgar Farajzadeh, M. Asghari jafarabadi, Mohsen Alirezaei Hoor, nazila Broumand Esfangareh","doi":"10.52547/shefa.10.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. COVID-19 2. Rehabilitation 3. Education Introduction: The style of children’s education, especially children with intellectual disabilities during the Covid-19 pandemic has changed. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of face-to-face and virtual training of basic cognitive skills in mental rehabilitation daycare centers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: The method of the present study is a longitudinal study of the trend. The statistical population was all children in rehabilitation centers in Tabriz, Iran. 30 children undergoing training and rehabilitation at the age of 6 to 12 years were selected by availability and the scores of these children in the field of cognitive abilities related to basic skills were examined. The instrument used in this study was a checklist for assessing basic skills and the Wechsler IQ scale for children. Results: The results showed that in the first three seasons, the scores obtained by these children after receiving educational and rehabilitation services in a face-to-face course significantly increased. However, with the global prevalence of coronavirus and the virtualization of the training course, scores significantly decreased. Finally, with the combination of face-to-face and virtual education, the trend has risen again, but the slope and speed of increasing scores are still lower than face-to-face courses. Conclusion: Face-to-face education compared to virtual education and the combination of the two, was more effective in improving cognitive abilities related to children’s basic skills. The abilities of educators and parents in the field of virtual education and the production of electronic content should be tailored to the special needs of these children.n ABSTRACT Article Info:","PeriodicalId":22899,"journal":{"name":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/shefa.10.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

1. COVID-19 2. Rehabilitation 3. Education Introduction: The style of children’s education, especially children with intellectual disabilities during the Covid-19 pandemic has changed. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of face-to-face and virtual training of basic cognitive skills in mental rehabilitation daycare centers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: The method of the present study is a longitudinal study of the trend. The statistical population was all children in rehabilitation centers in Tabriz, Iran. 30 children undergoing training and rehabilitation at the age of 6 to 12 years were selected by availability and the scores of these children in the field of cognitive abilities related to basic skills were examined. The instrument used in this study was a checklist for assessing basic skills and the Wechsler IQ scale for children. Results: The results showed that in the first three seasons, the scores obtained by these children after receiving educational and rehabilitation services in a face-to-face course significantly increased. However, with the global prevalence of coronavirus and the virtualization of the training course, scores significantly decreased. Finally, with the combination of face-to-face and virtual education, the trend has risen again, but the slope and speed of increasing scores are still lower than face-to-face courses. Conclusion: Face-to-face education compared to virtual education and the combination of the two, was more effective in improving cognitive abilities related to children’s basic skills. The abilities of educators and parents in the field of virtual education and the production of electronic content should be tailored to the special needs of these children.n ABSTRACT Article Info:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19大流行期间精神康复日托中心面对面与虚拟基本认知技能训练效果比较
1. COVID-19 2。康复3。教育简介:新冠肺炎疫情期间,儿童特别是智障儿童的教育方式发生了变化。本研究旨在比较Covid-19大流行期间精神康复日托中心面对面和虚拟基本认知技能培训的有效性。材料与方法:本研究的方法是趋势的纵向研究。统计人群为伊朗大不里士康复中心的所有儿童。根据可得性选择30名6至12岁接受训练和康复的儿童,并对这些儿童在与基本技能有关的认知能力领域的得分进行检查。在这项研究中使用的工具是评估基本技能的清单和韦氏儿童智商量表。结果:结果显示,前三个季度,接受面授课程教育康复服务的儿童得分显著提高。然而,随着冠状病毒在全球的流行和培训课程的虚拟化,得分明显下降。最后,随着面授和虚拟教育的结合,这一趋势再次上升,但分数增长的斜率和速度仍然低于面授课程。结论:面对面教育相对于虚拟教育及两者相结合,在提高幼儿基本技能相关认知能力方面更为有效。教育工作者和家长在虚拟教育和制作电子内容方面的能力应适应这些儿童的特殊需要。n摘要文章信息:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers in Brain Traumatic Injury Separation of Healthy Individuals and Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Using the Effective Communication of Brain Signals Comparison of Cold Executive Functions in Gambling Addicts, Drug Addicts, and Normal People Alzheimer's Disease: Narrative Review of Clinical Symptoms, Molecular Alterations, and Effective Physical and Biophysical Methods in its Improvement Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES): History, Theoretical Foundations and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1