FAIR Principles and TDWG Standards: The case of morphological description of taxa and specimens

Régine Vignes Lebbe
{"title":"FAIR Principles and TDWG Standards: The case of morphological description of taxa and specimens","authors":"Régine Vignes Lebbe","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.111859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharing data is crucial in biodiversity research as well as in all scientific domains. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) validates and makes available a set of standards to facilitate the sharing of biodiversity data. Of the 23 standards listed in alphabetical order, each has a status, a category, and a short description. But these standards are designed for very different purposes, which we will discuss by linking them to the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) .\n The FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016) focus on the ability of machines to automatically find and use the digital data. It is therefore crucial that software for editing, acquiring and using data, shares defined standards that are made available to all. TDWG has been working in this direction for over 30 years. Pioneers in biodiversity informatics, such as Richard Pankhust (Pankhurst 1970), Mike Dallwitz (Dallwitz 1974, Dallwitz 1980) and Jacques Lebbe (Lebbe et al. 1987) worked specifically on taxon identification with computers and how to represent morphological descriptions of taxa and specimens.\n Some TDWG standards, such as ABCD (Access to Biological Collection Data; Access to Biological Collections Data Task Group 2005), TCS (Taxonomic Concept Transfer Schema; Taxonomic Names Subgroup 2006) or SDD (Structured Descriptive Data; Structure of Descriptive Data (SDD) Subgroup 2006) are expressed by an XML schema covering a formal data model. Other standards, as Floristic Regions of the World (Takhtajan 1986), or Vocabulary Maintenance Standard (VMS; Vocabulary Maintenance Specification Task Group 2017) concern vocabularies or a collection of standardized terms. The Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS; World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1995) provides both, a list of accepted terms, and a data model (list of fields). In case of morpho-anatomical data describing taxa or specimens, TDWG offers two standards: DELTA (DEscription Language for TAxonomy, Dallwitz 2006) and SDD (Structured Descriptive Data, Hagedorn 2007).\n In order to further the discussion on morphological description data sharing, we would like to clarify what is meant by the term standard. We'll be looking at the concepts of guidelines, rules, defined format, referential list of terms, data schema, model, metamodel, protocols, which are all terms linked to this notion of standard and FAIR principles. Perhaps this reflection will lead us to propose criteria for better classifying TDWG standards.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.111859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sharing data is crucial in biodiversity research as well as in all scientific domains. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) validates and makes available a set of standards to facilitate the sharing of biodiversity data. Of the 23 standards listed in alphabetical order, each has a status, a category, and a short description. But these standards are designed for very different purposes, which we will discuss by linking them to the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) . The FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016) focus on the ability of machines to automatically find and use the digital data. It is therefore crucial that software for editing, acquiring and using data, shares defined standards that are made available to all. TDWG has been working in this direction for over 30 years. Pioneers in biodiversity informatics, such as Richard Pankhust (Pankhurst 1970), Mike Dallwitz (Dallwitz 1974, Dallwitz 1980) and Jacques Lebbe (Lebbe et al. 1987) worked specifically on taxon identification with computers and how to represent morphological descriptions of taxa and specimens. Some TDWG standards, such as ABCD (Access to Biological Collection Data; Access to Biological Collections Data Task Group 2005), TCS (Taxonomic Concept Transfer Schema; Taxonomic Names Subgroup 2006) or SDD (Structured Descriptive Data; Structure of Descriptive Data (SDD) Subgroup 2006) are expressed by an XML schema covering a formal data model. Other standards, as Floristic Regions of the World (Takhtajan 1986), or Vocabulary Maintenance Standard (VMS; Vocabulary Maintenance Specification Task Group 2017) concern vocabularies or a collection of standardized terms. The Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS; World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1995) provides both, a list of accepted terms, and a data model (list of fields). In case of morpho-anatomical data describing taxa or specimens, TDWG offers two standards: DELTA (DEscription Language for TAxonomy, Dallwitz 2006) and SDD (Structured Descriptive Data, Hagedorn 2007). In order to further the discussion on morphological description data sharing, we would like to clarify what is meant by the term standard. We'll be looking at the concepts of guidelines, rules, defined format, referential list of terms, data schema, model, metamodel, protocols, which are all terms linked to this notion of standard and FAIR principles. Perhaps this reflection will lead us to propose criteria for better classifying TDWG standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FAIR原则与TDWG标准:分类群与标本形态描述案例
共享数据对生物多样性研究以及所有科学领域都至关重要。生物多样性信息标准(TDWG)验证并提供了一套促进生物多样性数据共享的标准。在按字母顺序列出的23个标准中,每个标准都有一个地位、一个类别和一个简短的描述。但是这些标准是为非常不同的目的而设计的,我们将通过将它们与FAIR原则(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用)联系起来讨论这些目的。FAIR原则(Wilkinson et al. 2016)侧重于机器自动查找和使用数字数据的能力。因此,至关重要的是,用于编辑、获取和使用数据的软件,共享所有人都可以使用的定义标准。TDWG在这个方向上已经工作了30多年。生物多样性信息学的先驱,如Richard Pankhust (Pankhurst 1970), Mike Dallwitz (Dallwitz 1974, Dallwitz 1980)和Jacques Lebbe (Lebbe et al. 1987),专门研究了用计算机识别分类单元以及如何表示分类单元和标本的形态描述。一些TDWG标准,如ABCD(获取生物收集数据;生物馆藏数据访问任务组(2005),TCS(分类学概念转移图式;分类名称子组2006)或SDD(结构化描述性数据;描述数据结构(SDD) Subgroup 2006)由覆盖正式数据模型的XML模式表示。其他标准,如《世界植物区系》(Takhtajan 1986),或《词汇维护标准》(VMS;词汇维护规范任务组(2017)关注词汇表或标准化术语集合。植物发生和状态计划(POSS);世界保护监测中心(1995年)提供了一份接受的术语清单和一个数据模型(字段清单)。对于描述分类群或标本的形态解剖数据,TDWG提供了两个标准:DELTA(分类描述语言,Dallwitz 2006)和SDD(结构化描述数据,Hagedorn 2007)。为了进一步讨论形态描述数据共享,我们想澄清术语标准的含义。我们将研究指导方针、规则、定义格式、术语参考列表、数据模式、模型、元模型、协议等概念,这些都是与标准和公平原则概念相关的术语。也许这种反思将引导我们提出更好地分类TDWG标准的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meeting Report for the Phenoscape TraitFest 2023 with Comments on Organising Interdisciplinary Meetings Implementation Experience Report for the Developing Latimer Core Standard: The DiSSCo Flanders use-case Structuring Information from Plant Morphological Descriptions using Open Information Extraction The Future of Natural History Transcription: Navigating AI advancements with VoucherVision and the Specimen Label Transcription Project (SLTP) Comparative Study: Evaluating the effects of class balancing on transformer performance in the PlantNet-300k image dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1