Critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management: Survey results from the Asia Pacific region

Ashwani Kumar, B. Abbenbroek, N. Hammond, B. Vijayaraghavan, Lowell Ling, L. Thwaites, S. Myatra, S. Finfer
{"title":"Critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management: Survey results from the Asia Pacific region","authors":"Ashwani Kumar, B. Abbenbroek, N. Hammond, B. Vijayaraghavan, Lowell Ling, L. Thwaites, S. Myatra, S. Finfer","doi":"10.5430/jha.v11n1p23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is paucity of data on critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management in countries within the Asia Pacific region. An online survey was conducted from 15 April to 17 July 2020. Snowball sampling through the Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance and network contacts was used to recruit respondents. Countries were grouped according to the World Bank Country Income 2019 classification into lower-middle income (LMIC), upper-middle income (UMIC), and high-income (HIC). Survey questions addressed to hospital characteristics, critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management. In total, 59 hospitals from 15 countries responded (33 LMICs, 8 UMICs, 18 HICs) with most responses from the Philippines (10; 16.9%). Median [Inter-quartile range (IQR)] hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed capacity was 798 (500–1,001) and 37 (19–59), respectively. Median (IQR) doctor-to-patient and nurse-to-patient day ratios were 1:5 (1:3–1:8) and 1:2 (1:1–1:2), respectively. Availability of 24/7 physiotherapy services, 24/7 Medical resonance Imaging (MRI), point-of-care lactate, and “reserve” antibiotics was limited. Most ICUs had a disaster management plan (88%) and access to Personal Protective Equipment (96%). The most commonly adopted sepsis guideline was the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (77%). LMIC/UMIC ICUs had lower nurse-to patient ratio and surge capacity along with limited access to 24/7 physiotherapy and MRI services, and interventions like Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Self-reported adoption and adherence to sepsis guidelines was higher in LMICs/UMICs than HICs. In the Asia Pacific region, critical care resources, disaster preparedness and management of sepsis vary considerably between countries across different income categories. In particular, low surge and isolation capacity in LMICs highlights the need for better health service planning and preparation.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v11n1p23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is paucity of data on critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management in countries within the Asia Pacific region. An online survey was conducted from 15 April to 17 July 2020. Snowball sampling through the Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance and network contacts was used to recruit respondents. Countries were grouped according to the World Bank Country Income 2019 classification into lower-middle income (LMIC), upper-middle income (UMIC), and high-income (HIC). Survey questions addressed to hospital characteristics, critical care resources, disaster preparedness, and sepsis management. In total, 59 hospitals from 15 countries responded (33 LMICs, 8 UMICs, 18 HICs) with most responses from the Philippines (10; 16.9%). Median [Inter-quartile range (IQR)] hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed capacity was 798 (500–1,001) and 37 (19–59), respectively. Median (IQR) doctor-to-patient and nurse-to-patient day ratios were 1:5 (1:3–1:8) and 1:2 (1:1–1:2), respectively. Availability of 24/7 physiotherapy services, 24/7 Medical resonance Imaging (MRI), point-of-care lactate, and “reserve” antibiotics was limited. Most ICUs had a disaster management plan (88%) and access to Personal Protective Equipment (96%). The most commonly adopted sepsis guideline was the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (77%). LMIC/UMIC ICUs had lower nurse-to patient ratio and surge capacity along with limited access to 24/7 physiotherapy and MRI services, and interventions like Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Self-reported adoption and adherence to sepsis guidelines was higher in LMICs/UMICs than HICs. In the Asia Pacific region, critical care resources, disaster preparedness and management of sepsis vary considerably between countries across different income categories. In particular, low surge and isolation capacity in LMICs highlights the need for better health service planning and preparation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护资源、备灾和败血症管理:来自亚太地区的调查结果
亚太地区各国缺乏关于重症监护资源、备灾和败血症管理的数据。2020年4月15日至7月17日进行了一项在线调查。通过亚太败血症联盟和网络联系人进行雪球抽样来招募受访者。根据世界银行2019年国家收入分类,将各国分为中低收入(LMIC)、中高收入(UMIC)和高收入(HIC)。调查问题涉及医院特点、重症监护资源、灾难准备和败血症管理。总共有来自15个国家的59家医院做出了答复(33个中低收入国家,8个中低收入国家,18个高收入国家),其中大多数答复来自菲律宾(10家;16.9%)。医院和重症监护病房(ICU)床位容量的中位数[四分位数间距(IQR)]分别为798(500 - 1001)和37(19-59)。中位数(IQR)医生对病人和护士对病人的日比例分别为1:5(1:3-1:8)和1:2(1:1-1:2)。24/7物理治疗服务、24/7医学磁共振成像(MRI)、护理点乳酸盐和“储备”抗生素的可用性有限。大多数icu有灾害管理计划(88%),并可获得个人防护装备(96%)。最常采用的脓毒症指南是生存脓毒症运动指南(77%)。LMIC/UMIC icu的护士与患者比例和激增能力较低,并且获得24/7物理治疗和MRI服务的机会有限,以及诸如体外膜氧合和持续肾脏替代治疗等干预措施。在中低收入/中低收入国家中,自我报告采用和遵守败血症指南的比例高于高收入国家。在亚太地区,不同收入类别的国家在重症监护资源、备灾和败血症管理方面存在很大差异。特别是,中低收入国家的激增和隔离能力较低,突出表明需要更好地规划和准备保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1