Comparative Analysis of the Fatigue Contact Strength of Surfaces Hardened by Cementation and the Ion Plasma Nitriding Аvinit N

A. V. Sagalovych, V. Popov, Vladislav Sagalovуch, S. Dudnik, Vladimir Bogoslavzev, N. Stadnichenko, A. Edinovych
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Fatigue Contact Strength of Surfaces Hardened by Cementation and the Ion Plasma Nitriding Аvinit N","authors":"A. V. Sagalovych, V. Popov, Vladislav Sagalovуch, S. Dudnik, Vladimir Bogoslavzev, N. Stadnichenko, A. Edinovych","doi":"10.15587/1729-4061.2020.217674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports comparative tribotechnical tests of surfaces, hardened by cementation and plasma nitriding Avinit N, for contact fatigue strength at friction in rolling with slipping. Following the cementation, the samples' hardened layer thickness was 1.2 mm; on nitriding, the thickness of the hardened layer was 0.25 mm. The tests were carried out using an acoustic emission method, which is extremely sensitive when registering the transition of tribosystems' operation from the normal (mechanochemical) wear to the initial surface destruction of a fatigue nature.<br><br>The tests have shown that the average number of cycles before the initial destruction due to fatigue for the samples hardened by the Avinit nitriding technology is 1.82-time higher compared to the cementation-hardened samples. The depth of damage at the surface of the cemented samples could vary between 0.01 and 0.027 mm depending on the diameter of the damage. For the nitrided surfaces, the depth of damage did not exceed 0.003 mm.<br><br>The samples' resistance to the fatigue wear (destruction) was determined by tests based on 1,000,000 cycles at contact loads σmax=1,140 MPa, typical of medium-loaded surfaces. The test results demonstrated that the integrated multicyclic resistance to fatigue wear (destruction) of the samples, hardened by nitriding, is more than 10 times higher than that of the cementation-hardened samples.<br><br>The study reported here confirms the effectiveness of using the Avinit ion-plasma nitriding technology instead of cementing, to improve the contact strength of the parts' surfaces. At the same time, worth noting are the advantages of this technology to maintain the size and high quality of surface treatment, which eliminates the need to mechanically finish them after hardening.","PeriodicalId":10639,"journal":{"name":"Computational Materials Science eJournal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Materials Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.217674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reports comparative tribotechnical tests of surfaces, hardened by cementation and plasma nitriding Avinit N, for contact fatigue strength at friction in rolling with slipping. Following the cementation, the samples' hardened layer thickness was 1.2 mm; on nitriding, the thickness of the hardened layer was 0.25 mm. The tests were carried out using an acoustic emission method, which is extremely sensitive when registering the transition of tribosystems' operation from the normal (mechanochemical) wear to the initial surface destruction of a fatigue nature.

The tests have shown that the average number of cycles before the initial destruction due to fatigue for the samples hardened by the Avinit nitriding technology is 1.82-time higher compared to the cementation-hardened samples. The depth of damage at the surface of the cemented samples could vary between 0.01 and 0.027 mm depending on the diameter of the damage. For the nitrided surfaces, the depth of damage did not exceed 0.003 mm.

The samples' resistance to the fatigue wear (destruction) was determined by tests based on 1,000,000 cycles at contact loads σmax=1,140 MPa, typical of medium-loaded surfaces. The test results demonstrated that the integrated multicyclic resistance to fatigue wear (destruction) of the samples, hardened by nitriding, is more than 10 times higher than that of the cementation-hardened samples.

The study reported here confirms the effectiveness of using the Avinit ion-plasma nitriding technology instead of cementing, to improve the contact strength of the parts' surfaces. At the same time, worth noting are the advantages of this technology to maintain the size and high quality of surface treatment, which eliminates the need to mechanically finish them after hardening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶结硬化与离子等离子体渗氮表面疲劳接触强度对比分析Аvinit N
本文报道了经渗碳和等离子渗氮avitn硬化的表面在滑动滚动摩擦时接触疲劳强度的比较摩擦技术试验。胶结后,试样硬化层厚度为1.2 mm;渗氮时硬化层厚度为0.25 mm。测试使用声发射方法进行,该方法在记录摩擦系统从正常(机械化学)磨损到疲劳性质的初始表面破坏的转变时非常敏感。试验结果表明,Avinit渗氮硬化试样在疲劳初始破坏前的平均循环次数是胶结硬化试样的1.82倍。根据损伤直径的不同,试件表面损伤深度可在0.01 ~ 0.027 mm之间变化。氮化表面的损伤深度不超过0.003 mm,试样的抗疲劳磨损(破坏)性能通过接触载荷σmax=1,140 MPa(典型的中等载荷表面)的1,000,000次试验来确定。试验结果表明,渗氮硬化试样的综合多环抗疲劳磨损(破坏)性能比渗氮硬化试样提高10倍以上。该研究报告证实了使用Avinit离子等离子体渗氮技术而不是胶凝技术来提高零件表面接触强度的有效性。同时,值得注意的是,该技术的优点是保持尺寸和高质量的表面处理,从而消除了硬化后机械处理的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metal-Graphene Hybrid Terahertz Metasurfaces Based on Bound States in the Continuum (Bic) and Quasi-Bic for Dynamic Near-Field Imaging Rapid Nucleation and Growth of Tetrafluoroethane Hydrate in the Cyclic Process of Boiling–Condensation A Unified Maximum Entropy Principle Approach for a Large Class of Routing Problems Fabrication of a Novel Surface Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Based on Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-7 for Selective Extraction of Phthalates Measuring Oxygen Solubility in Ni Grains and Boundaries after Oxidation Using Atom Probe Tomography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1