The problem and potential of piracy: legal changes and emerging ideas of colonial autonomy in the early modern British Atlantic, 1670–1730

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal for Maritime Research Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/21533369.2016.1253317
R. Simon
{"title":"The problem and potential of piracy: legal changes and emerging ideas of colonial autonomy in the early modern British Atlantic, 1670–1730","authors":"R. Simon","doi":"10.1080/21533369.2016.1253317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article focuses on British maritime law to discuss the challenge of transferring Admiralty law to Britain's Atlantic colonies, considered through the lens pirate trials and executions. Colonial governors in North America and the West Indies tolerated piracy during the seventeenth century to obtain goods barred from the restrictions imposed by the Navigation Acts. These deals were largely ignored, but the increasing piratical insults against the Crown and pressure from foreign competitors, such as Spain, forced British officials to crack down on piracy. Unfortunately, years of tolerating pirates had allowed these criminals to become too numerous for British officials to transport captured pirates back to England for trial and executions. As a result, by 1700 they had to establish their maritime legal ruling body, the Admiralty Court, throughout the American colonies under the jurisdiction of local governors. However, complex geographical challenges in the Caribbean and religiously influenced social laws in North America forced colonial governors to alter the English system to fit their needs and create autonomous legal networks. This article argues that the establishment and maintenance of British Admiralty law in the Atlantic colonies led to the development of early American ideas of autonomy.","PeriodicalId":38023,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Maritime Research","volume":"128 1","pages":"123 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Maritime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2016.1253317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article focuses on British maritime law to discuss the challenge of transferring Admiralty law to Britain's Atlantic colonies, considered through the lens pirate trials and executions. Colonial governors in North America and the West Indies tolerated piracy during the seventeenth century to obtain goods barred from the restrictions imposed by the Navigation Acts. These deals were largely ignored, but the increasing piratical insults against the Crown and pressure from foreign competitors, such as Spain, forced British officials to crack down on piracy. Unfortunately, years of tolerating pirates had allowed these criminals to become too numerous for British officials to transport captured pirates back to England for trial and executions. As a result, by 1700 they had to establish their maritime legal ruling body, the Admiralty Court, throughout the American colonies under the jurisdiction of local governors. However, complex geographical challenges in the Caribbean and religiously influenced social laws in North America forced colonial governors to alter the English system to fit their needs and create autonomous legal networks. This article argues that the establishment and maintenance of British Admiralty law in the Atlantic colonies led to the development of early American ideas of autonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海盗的问题和潜力:1670-1730年早期英属大西洋的法律变化和殖民地自治的新思想
本文以英国海商法为研究对象,通过对海盗审判和处决的视角,探讨海军法向英国大西洋殖民地转移的挑战。17世纪,北美和西印度群岛的殖民统治者容忍海盗行为,以获取不受《航海法》限制的货物。这些交易在很大程度上被忽略了,但海盗对英国王室的侮辱越来越多,加上来自西班牙等外国竞争对手的压力,迫使英国官员打击盗版。不幸的是,由于多年来对海盗的容忍,这些海盗数量过多,英国官员无法将抓获的海盗运回英国进行审判和处决。因此,到1700年,他们不得不在美国各殖民地建立自己的海事法律裁决机构——海军部法庭,由当地总督管辖。然而,加勒比地区复杂的地理挑战和宗教影响了北美的社会法律,迫使殖民地统治者改变英国的制度,以适应他们的需要,并建立自主的法律网络。本文认为,英国海军法在大西洋殖民地的建立和维持导致了早期美国自治思想的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Maritime Research
Journal for Maritime Research Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal for Maritime Research ( JMR ), established by the National Maritime Museum in 1999, focuses on historical enquiry at the intersections of maritime, British and global history. It champions a wide spectrum of innovative research on the maritime past. While the Journal has a particular focus on the British experience, it positions this within broad oceanic and international contexts, encouraging comparative perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches. The journal publishes research essays and reviews around 15-20 new books each year across a broad spectrum of maritime history. All research articles published in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, involving initial editor screening and independent assessment, normally by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Enrolment at the French Navy’s School of Advanced Studies in Paris from 1896 to 1899 South Sea Argonaut: James Colnett and the enlargement of the Pacific, 1772–1803 Suppressing piracy in the early eighteenth century: pirates, merchants and British imperial authority in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans The society of prisoners: Anglo-French wars and incarceration in the eighteenth century The British navy in the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1