Perceived Stress and Its Relationship to Moral Resilience Among Nurses in the Hail Region, Saudi Arabia

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Makara Journal of Health Research Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.7454/msk.v26i3.1370
H. Albaqawi, M. Alrashidi
{"title":"Perceived Stress and Its Relationship to Moral Resilience Among Nurses in the Hail Region, Saudi Arabia","authors":"H. Albaqawi, M. Alrashidi","doi":"10.7454/msk.v26i3.1370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to determine the relationship between perceived stress and moral resilience among nurses. Methods: The researcher used a quantitative-comparative correlational study design that utilized a self-administered questionnaire with 393 nurse participants in the Hail Region, Saudi Arabia. Adapted questionnaires were distributed through Google Form survey. Data collection was conducted between October and November 2021.Results: The nurses were moderately stressed (21.69/30) but morally resilient (2.74/4). Perceived stress scale (p < 0.033) and moral resilience (p < 0.25) were found to be significantly associated with gender. The designated ward and age were not significantly associated with perceived stress and moral resilience. Conversely, the years of experience showed a significant association with perceived stress (p < 0.038) but not with moral resilience (p > 0.255). Finally, no relationship was observed between perceived stress and moral resilience (p > 0.248).Conclusions: The nurses were perceived to be moderately stressed but morally resilient. Gender was found to have a significant association with perceived stress and moral resilience but not with designated ward and age. Conversely, the years of experience had a significant association with perceived stress but not with moral resilience. Meanwhile, perceived stress had no significant relationship with moral resilience. Therefore, being morally robust allows nurses to respond to challenging, frequently intractable ethical issues that arise in clinical practice and during pandemics, regardless of the underlying stress at work.","PeriodicalId":51994,"journal":{"name":"Makara Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/msk.v26i3.1370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the relationship between perceived stress and moral resilience among nurses. Methods: The researcher used a quantitative-comparative correlational study design that utilized a self-administered questionnaire with 393 nurse participants in the Hail Region, Saudi Arabia. Adapted questionnaires were distributed through Google Form survey. Data collection was conducted between October and November 2021.Results: The nurses were moderately stressed (21.69/30) but morally resilient (2.74/4). Perceived stress scale (p < 0.033) and moral resilience (p < 0.25) were found to be significantly associated with gender. The designated ward and age were not significantly associated with perceived stress and moral resilience. Conversely, the years of experience showed a significant association with perceived stress (p < 0.038) but not with moral resilience (p > 0.255). Finally, no relationship was observed between perceived stress and moral resilience (p > 0.248).Conclusions: The nurses were perceived to be moderately stressed but morally resilient. Gender was found to have a significant association with perceived stress and moral resilience but not with designated ward and age. Conversely, the years of experience had a significant association with perceived stress but not with moral resilience. Meanwhile, perceived stress had no significant relationship with moral resilience. Therefore, being morally robust allows nurses to respond to challenging, frequently intractable ethical issues that arise in clinical practice and during pandemics, regardless of the underlying stress at work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯Hail地区护士的感知压力及其与道德弹性的关系
背景:本研究旨在探讨护士感知压力与道德弹性之间的关系。方法:研究人员采用定量比较相关研究设计,利用对沙特阿拉伯Hail地区393名护士参与者的自我管理问卷。改编问卷通过谷歌表格调查分发。数据收集于2021年10月至11月期间进行。结果:护士压力适中(21.69/30),道德韧性较强(2.74/4)。感知压力量表(p < 0.033)和道德弹性(p < 0.25)与性别显著相关。指定病房和年龄与感知压力和道德恢复力无显著相关。相反,经验年数与感知压力显著相关(p < 0.038),但与道德弹性无关(p > 0.255)。最后,感知压力与道德弹性之间没有关系(p > 0.248)。结论:护士被认为是中等压力,但道德弹性。研究发现,性别与感知压力和道德韧性有显著关联,但与指定病房和年龄无关。相反,多年的经验与感知压力有显著的联系,但与道德弹性无关。同时,感知压力对道德弹性的影响不显著。因此,道德上的坚强使护士能够应对临床实践和大流行期间出现的具有挑战性的、往往难以解决的道德问题,而不管工作中的潜在压力如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Makara Journal of Health Research
Makara Journal of Health Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors Associated with Occupational Stress among Malaysian Construction Professionals Association between rs2787094 Genetic Variants in ADAM33 Gene and Asthma in Indonesian Population: Preliminary study Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale Prediction of Factors for Patients with Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Using Multilayer Feedforward Neural Networks and Ordered Logistic Regression Analysis: A Robust Hybrid Methodology Relationship Between Plasma Fluoride Levels, Glutathione Peroxidase Activity, Hemoglobin, and Abortion in Rural and Urban Pregnant Women from Settat (Morocco)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1