Evaluative study between calculated and measured DVHs for advance techniques of radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Patients

I. Elhamamsi, K. Elshahat, A. El-Shershaby, T. Hegazy
{"title":"Evaluative study between calculated and measured DVHs for advance techniques of radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Patients","authors":"I. Elhamamsi, K. Elshahat, A. El-Shershaby, T. Hegazy","doi":"10.21608/jsrs.2021.210652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to use 3DVH software (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA) to compare the dose that was predicted by treatment planning system (TPS) with the measured dose obtained by ArcCHECK dosimetric device using two advance treatment techniques: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). Thirty prostate cancer patients who were treated with VMAT and replanned with IMRT using Eclipse planning system were studied. The percentage dose differences (%DDs) were calculated using 3DVH software for planning target volume (PTV) and risk organ (OARs). The correlations between %DD and the gamma pass rate (GPR) (3%/3mm, 2%/2mm and 1%/1mm) criterion were examined. Both the DVHs calculated by 3DVH and the one projected by TPS were compared using the different parameters for PTV and OAR. In VMAT technique, the %DD was less than 3% for PTV and 4% for OAR while the IMRT technique recorded %DD less than 2% for PTV and 4% for OAR. 3DVH was somewhat more consistent with the planned VMAT verification data compared to ArcCHECK, with a mean gamma pass rate of 99.34% for the 3%/3 mm criterion Based on our results, VMAT is especially beneficial for prostate most cancers treatment.","PeriodicalId":16981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research in Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research in Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jsrs.2021.210652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to use 3DVH software (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA) to compare the dose that was predicted by treatment planning system (TPS) with the measured dose obtained by ArcCHECK dosimetric device using two advance treatment techniques: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). Thirty prostate cancer patients who were treated with VMAT and replanned with IMRT using Eclipse planning system were studied. The percentage dose differences (%DDs) were calculated using 3DVH software for planning target volume (PTV) and risk organ (OARs). The correlations between %DD and the gamma pass rate (GPR) (3%/3mm, 2%/2mm and 1%/1mm) criterion were examined. Both the DVHs calculated by 3DVH and the one projected by TPS were compared using the different parameters for PTV and OAR. In VMAT technique, the %DD was less than 3% for PTV and 4% for OAR while the IMRT technique recorded %DD less than 2% for PTV and 4% for OAR. 3DVH was somewhat more consistent with the planned VMAT verification data compared to ArcCHECK, with a mean gamma pass rate of 99.34% for the 3%/3 mm criterion Based on our results, VMAT is especially beneficial for prostate most cancers treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌患者先进放疗技术计算dvh与测量dvh的评价研究
本研究旨在使用3DVH软件(Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA)比较治疗计划系统(TPS)预测的剂量与ArcCHECK剂量计装置获得的测量剂量,采用两种先进的治疗技术:体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)。本研究采用Eclipse计划系统对30例前列腺癌患者行VMAT治疗后再行IMRT。采用3DVH软件计算剂量差百分比(%DDs),规划靶体积(PTV)和危险器官(OARs)。研究了%DD与γ通过率(GPR) (3%/3mm, 2%/2mm和1%/1mm)标准之间的相关性。使用不同的PTV和OAR参数,比较3DVH计算的dvh和TPS预测的dvh。在VMAT技术中,PTV的%DD小于3%,OAR的%DD小于4%,而IMRT技术中PTV的%DD小于2%,OAR的%DD小于4%。与ArcCHECK相比,3DVH与VMAT计划验证数据更加一致,在3%/ 3mm标准下,平均伽马通过率为99.34%。基于我们的结果,VMAT对前列腺大多数癌症的治疗尤其有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Implementation of Electronic Illumination Control System Potential protective role of spirulina algae and/or aminoguanidine on carbon tetrachloride induced liver fibrosis in rats Comparative Study of Commonly Used Batteries for Solar PV Applications Pollen morphology of some Rosa L. cultivars from Egypt Graphene-based hydrogel silver nano-composites for antibacterial and antitumor applications: In vitro evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1