ESTIMATION OF BANKRUPTCY RISK BASED ON AUDIT OPINIONS: CASE STUDY IN ROMANIA

Moțoc Mădălin-Mihai
{"title":"ESTIMATION OF BANKRUPTCY RISK BASED ON AUDIT OPINIONS: CASE STUDY IN ROMANIA","authors":"Moțoc Mădălin-Mihai","doi":"10.22630/aspe.2021.20.3.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world focused on growth, capital accumulation and continuous economic development, it is important to build safety levers to ensure that investors see a return on their investments. Media outlets, brokers, financial institutions and the business environment are now referring, more than ever, to investment policies not only of companies, but also of individuals with sustainable economic capital. Platforms such as Forex, e-Toro, Capital.com, Libertex, cryptocurrency trading platforms and free access to the Stock Exchange now make it extremely easy for third-party investors, with promises of significant returns in a very short period of time. But are all these exhortations and “marketing guns” directed at individuals’ finances devoid of speculative interest? The purpose of this paper is to identify a model of bankruptcy risk estimation that is based on the opinions of audit companies regarding the reasonableness of annual financial statements and their associated fraud risk. This paper presents an empirical approach to the insolvency phenomenon, based on the opinions of the auditors who classify the audited companies as having an associated fraud risk. The study was conducted at the level of companies on the main trading market of the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The results show that an audited company as having classified by auditors as an associated fraud risk is at least one step closer to bankruptcy, as opposed to companies without an assessed risk of associated fraud. The ability of audit companies to contribute to bankruptcy risk estimation models by flagging fraud risk, based on analysis of financial statements, represents a recurring problem in the specialized literature. This paper brings added value in establishing viable models of bankruptcy risk for big companies on the market.","PeriodicalId":34287,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22630/aspe.2021.20.3.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world focused on growth, capital accumulation and continuous economic development, it is important to build safety levers to ensure that investors see a return on their investments. Media outlets, brokers, financial institutions and the business environment are now referring, more than ever, to investment policies not only of companies, but also of individuals with sustainable economic capital. Platforms such as Forex, e-Toro, Capital.com, Libertex, cryptocurrency trading platforms and free access to the Stock Exchange now make it extremely easy for third-party investors, with promises of significant returns in a very short period of time. But are all these exhortations and “marketing guns” directed at individuals’ finances devoid of speculative interest? The purpose of this paper is to identify a model of bankruptcy risk estimation that is based on the opinions of audit companies regarding the reasonableness of annual financial statements and their associated fraud risk. This paper presents an empirical approach to the insolvency phenomenon, based on the opinions of the auditors who classify the audited companies as having an associated fraud risk. The study was conducted at the level of companies on the main trading market of the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The results show that an audited company as having classified by auditors as an associated fraud risk is at least one step closer to bankruptcy, as opposed to companies without an assessed risk of associated fraud. The ability of audit companies to contribute to bankruptcy risk estimation models by flagging fraud risk, based on analysis of financial statements, represents a recurring problem in the specialized literature. This paper brings added value in establishing viable models of bankruptcy risk for big companies on the market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于审计意见的破产风险评估:以罗马尼亚为例
在一个以增长、资本积累和持续经济发展为重点的世界里,建立安全杠杆以确保投资者的投资获得回报非常重要。媒体、经纪人、金融机构和商业环境现在比以往任何时候都更关注公司的投资政策,也关注拥有可持续经济资本的个人的投资政策。Forex, e-Toro, Capital.com, Libertex等平台,加密货币交易平台和免费进入证券交易所的服务,现在使第三方投资者非常容易,并承诺在很短的时间内获得可观的回报。但是,所有这些针对个人财务的劝诫和“营销枪”都缺乏投机兴趣吗?本文的目的是建立一个基于审计公司对年度财务报表的合理性及其相关欺诈风险的意见的破产风险估计模型。本文提出了一种经验的方法来处理破产现象,基于审计人员的意见,他们将被审计的公司分类为具有相关的欺诈风险。这项研究是在布加勒斯特证券交易所主要交易市场的公司一级进行的。结果表明,与没有评估相关欺诈风险的公司相比,被审计的公司被审计人员归类为存在相关欺诈风险,至少更接近破产。审计公司在财务报表分析的基础上通过标记欺诈风险为破产风险估计模型做出贡献的能力,在专业文献中是一个反复出现的问题。本文对建立可行的市场大公司破产风险模型具有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
INDIVIDUAL FARMERS’ BANK LOANS AND DEPOSITS IN POLAND UNDER ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC EFFECTS OF THE NEW TAXATION SYSTEM ON RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN ALBANIA ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOLOGICAL AGENT USE IN ECOLOGICAL POTATO PRODUCTION – SYSTEM DYNAMICS SIMULATION INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SUPERVISORY BOARDS AS ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE CODE OF COMMERCIAL COMPANIES CHANGE MANAGEMENT MECHANISM IN THE ORGANIZATION IN CRISIS CONDITIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1