David M. Troendle, Bhaskar Gurram, Rong Huang, B. Barth
{"title":"IV Ibuprofen for Prevention of Post-Ercp Pancreatitis in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Study.","authors":"David M. Troendle, Bhaskar Gurram, Rong Huang, B. Barth","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is reported to occur in up to 11% of pediatric patients. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated an intervention to prevent PEP in children. It is unclear if such a study is even feasible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of studying IV Ibuprofen for PEP prevention in the pediatric population. METHODS This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility study. Patients < 19 years of age undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg IV Ibuprofen (max of 800 mg) or placebo (saline) at the time of ERCP. The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP related bleeding, rates of other procedural and medication related adverse events. RESULTS 58 patients were randomized and received either IV Ibuprofen or placebo. Pre-procedure and procedure related factors were not significantly different between the groups except that patients in the placebo group tended to weigh less (48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03). There were 7 episodes of PEP (12%). PEP was less frequently identified in the Ibuprofen group than the control group (7% vs. 17%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Mean post-procedural abdominal pain scores were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group than the control group (1.1 vs 3.1, p = 0.01) and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure was significantly lower in Ibuprofen group than the control group (3% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in procedure related or drug related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Post-procedural pain scores and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group. The current study provides encouraging, but only very weak evidence that IV ibuprofen decreases PEP in children. Power analysis suggests that a small handful of high-volume pediatric centers would be able to perform an adequate clinical trial in a reasonable time frame. Focusing on all cause post-procedural pain (PEP and non-PEP) may allow for a more efficiency study design and be just as clinically relevant.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is reported to occur in up to 11% of pediatric patients. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated an intervention to prevent PEP in children. It is unclear if such a study is even feasible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of studying IV Ibuprofen for PEP prevention in the pediatric population. METHODS This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility study. Patients < 19 years of age undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg IV Ibuprofen (max of 800 mg) or placebo (saline) at the time of ERCP. The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP related bleeding, rates of other procedural and medication related adverse events. RESULTS 58 patients were randomized and received either IV Ibuprofen or placebo. Pre-procedure and procedure related factors were not significantly different between the groups except that patients in the placebo group tended to weigh less (48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03). There were 7 episodes of PEP (12%). PEP was less frequently identified in the Ibuprofen group than the control group (7% vs. 17%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Mean post-procedural abdominal pain scores were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group than the control group (1.1 vs 3.1, p = 0.01) and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure was significantly lower in Ibuprofen group than the control group (3% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in procedure related or drug related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Post-procedural pain scores and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group. The current study provides encouraging, but only very weak evidence that IV ibuprofen decreases PEP in children. Power analysis suggests that a small handful of high-volume pediatric centers would be able to perform an adequate clinical trial in a reasonable time frame. Focusing on all cause post-procedural pain (PEP and non-PEP) may allow for a more efficiency study design and be just as clinically relevant.