Legal status of the prosecutor in arbitration proceedings

Abstract

The article examines the legal position of the prosecutor in the system of participants in arbitration proceedings. Based on the analysis of the nature of arbitration proceedings and civil cases considered by arbitration courts, it was concluded that, despite the consolidation of the independent constitutional status of arbitration proceedings as a separate procedural form of protection, it is still impossible to draw a clear distinction between civil and arbitration proceedings. Both in civil and in arbitration proceedings, both private law and public law disputed legal relations are the subject of judicial activity. This circumstance determines the commonality of the goals and objectives of civil and arbitration proceedings, which directly affects the procedural status of the persons involved in the case. The prosecutor traditionally treats the legislator to the persons participating in the case, both in civil and in arbitration proceedings. A retrospective look at Russian procedural legislation led to the conclusion that it is necessary to maintain the supervisory function of the prosecutor not only in civil, but also in arbitration proceedings. The truncated powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process do not correspond to the tasks he performs in the field of civil jurisdiction, and it is proposed to expand them in a number of areas.