The Efficacy of Cognitive-Communicative Intervention in Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Q3 Medicine Audiology and Speech Research Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.21848/asr.220054
M. S. Lee
{"title":"The Efficacy of Cognitive-Communicative Intervention in Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"M. S. Lee","doi":"10.21848/asr.220054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease, highlighting the need for identifying and ranking effective cognitivecommunication interventions.Methods: Databases were searched since 2005 to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for SCD. I reviewed systematically twenty researches and proposed the evidence based data, including their effect sizes using a meta-analysis method. Outcome measures included the domains of 12 cognitions and three communications.Results: The main findings were as follows. Firstly, intervention programs were designed diversely in a session or mode. Their main domains were general cognition, memory, language, etc. Secondly, the average effect size of cognitive-communication interventions was significant. Thirdly, most cognitive domains like processing speed, memory, working memory, and executive function were very effective and significant in the results of treatment. Lastly, naming and comprehension in communication had the significant effect sizes.Conclusion: These results provide evidence-based information to support cognitive-communication intervention for individuals with SCD. Given this, it is possible to facilitate the preventive interventions for SCD in clinical settings, warranting further research into effective elements of their approaches.","PeriodicalId":36841,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Speech Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Speech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.220054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease, highlighting the need for identifying and ranking effective cognitivecommunication interventions.Methods: Databases were searched since 2005 to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for SCD. I reviewed systematically twenty researches and proposed the evidence based data, including their effect sizes using a meta-analysis method. Outcome measures included the domains of 12 cognitions and three communications.Results: The main findings were as follows. Firstly, intervention programs were designed diversely in a session or mode. Their main domains were general cognition, memory, language, etc. Secondly, the average effect size of cognitive-communication interventions was significant. Thirdly, most cognitive domains like processing speed, memory, working memory, and executive function were very effective and significant in the results of treatment. Lastly, naming and comprehension in communication had the significant effect sizes.Conclusion: These results provide evidence-based information to support cognitive-communication intervention for individuals with SCD. Given this, it is possible to facilitate the preventive interventions for SCD in clinical settings, warranting further research into effective elements of their approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知交际干预对主观认知能力下降的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:主观认知能力下降(SCD)是轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的危险因素,强调了识别和排名有效的认知沟通干预措施的必要性。方法:检索自2005年以来的数据库,以确定评估SCD干预措施的随机对照试验。我系统地回顾了20项研究,并提出了基于证据的数据,包括使用荟萃分析方法的效应量。结果测量包括12个认知领域和3个沟通领域。结果:主要发现如下。首先,干预方案在一个会话或模式中设计多样化。他们的主要领域是一般认知、记忆、语言等。其次,认知-沟通干预的平均效应值显著。第三,大多数认知领域如处理速度、记忆、工作记忆和执行功能对治疗结果非常有效和显著。最后,沟通中的命名和理解具有显著的效应量。结论:这些结果为支持SCD个体的认知沟通干预提供了循证信息。鉴于此,有可能在临床环境中促进SCD的预防性干预,需要进一步研究其方法的有效因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Speech Research
Audiology and Speech Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Research on Effective Methodology for Hearing Impairment Rehabilitation; Based on a Diary Study for Elderly OnlineAuditory Training Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties and Hearing Aid Uptake Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in Cochlear Implant Users Research Trends According to the Speech Production Mechanism of Patients with Dysarthria Caused by Acute Brain Injury in Korea The Necessity for Auditory Training with Idiomatic Expressions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1