Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of acrylic teeth with heat polymerized acrylic resins using different surface treatments and curing cycles – An in vitro study

K. Amulya, A. Chakravarthy, B. Prasad, R. Avinash, K. Babu, Kavya Sandhu
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of acrylic teeth with heat polymerized acrylic resins using different surface treatments and curing cycles – An in vitro study","authors":"K. Amulya, A. Chakravarthy, B. Prasad, R. Avinash, K. Babu, Kavya Sandhu","doi":"10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_17_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study evaluated the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to heat cure denture base resin processed under different curing cycles and after various surface treatments on the bonding surface area of acrylic denture teeth. Materials and Methods: A two-piece metal mold of 35 mm length and 12 mm diameter was fabricated to standardize the attachment of teeth at 45°. Ninety such wax cylinders were obtained and were randomly divided and coded into three groups of 30 samples each: Group “A” – the “Control” group, Group “B” – the “MMM” group, and Group “C” – the “Acetone” group with Subgroup 1 – processing with short curing cycle and Subgroup 2 – processing with long curing cycle in each group. These 90 wax cylinder specimens were then flasked, dewaxed as per the standard protocol and surface treatment of teeth, and curing was done. The samples were tested in a universal testing machine. Results: ANOVA analysis inferred that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean bond strength values among the groups. Conclusion: Analysis of mean bond strength values reveals that the mean bond strength values of acetone were significantly higher (P < 0.05) when compared to the other groups.","PeriodicalId":14257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"38 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_17_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to heat cure denture base resin processed under different curing cycles and after various surface treatments on the bonding surface area of acrylic denture teeth. Materials and Methods: A two-piece metal mold of 35 mm length and 12 mm diameter was fabricated to standardize the attachment of teeth at 45°. Ninety such wax cylinders were obtained and were randomly divided and coded into three groups of 30 samples each: Group “A” – the “Control” group, Group “B” – the “MMM” group, and Group “C” – the “Acetone” group with Subgroup 1 – processing with short curing cycle and Subgroup 2 – processing with long curing cycle in each group. These 90 wax cylinder specimens were then flasked, dewaxed as per the standard protocol and surface treatment of teeth, and curing was done. The samples were tested in a universal testing machine. Results: ANOVA analysis inferred that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean bond strength values among the groups. Conclusion: Analysis of mean bond strength values reveals that the mean bond strength values of acetone were significantly higher (P < 0.05) when compared to the other groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同表面处理和固化周期下丙烯酸树脂牙体抗剪强度的比较研究
目的:研究不同固化周期和不同表面处理对丙烯酸树脂义齿粘接表面积的影响,评价丙烯酸树脂义齿与热固化义齿基托树脂的粘接强度。材料与方法:制作长35mm、直径12mm的两片式金属模具,以规范45°牙的附着。获得90个蜡瓶,随机分为三组,每组30个样品:A组为“Control”组,B组为“MMM”组,C组为“Acetone”组,每组中有短固化周期加工的亚组1和长固化周期加工的亚组2。然后将这90个蜡柱试样烧瓶,按照标准方案和牙齿表面处理脱蜡,并进行养护。样品在万能试验机上进行测试。结果:方差分析显示,各组间的平均粘结强度值差异有统计学意义。结论:对平均键强度值的分析显示,丙酮的平均键强度值显著高于其他组(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and differential leukocyte count: Anemia in gingivitis and periodontitis patients in Kerala population – A cross-sectional study Congenital granular cell tumors Early prosthetic management of mandible using interim guidance appliances in hemimandibulectomy patients: A case series Comparative evaluation of conventional and diode laser-assisted gingival curettage in shallow suprabony periodontal pocket – Three months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment and psychology of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1