{"title":"Students’ Willingness to Pay for More Local, Organic, Non-GMO and General Food Options","authors":"Christopher C. Bruno, Benjamin L. Campbell","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.249998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As universities look to source “sustainable†products, it is critical to understand student demand and the economic feasibility of adding new sustainable products. Using an online survey in conjunction with a Tobit model we find that half of students in our sample are willing to pay more for increased local and organic food options with only a third willing to pay more for increased non-GMO options. The economic feasibility of adding new local, organic, and non-GMO options is questionable as charging students for their willingness to pay results in only a 1–2% gain in revenue which may not cover the cost of more options in on-campus dining halls.","PeriodicalId":36788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"32-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.249998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
As universities look to source “sustainable†products, it is critical to understand student demand and the economic feasibility of adding new sustainable products. Using an online survey in conjunction with a Tobit model we find that half of students in our sample are willing to pay more for increased local and organic food options with only a third willing to pay more for increased non-GMO options. The economic feasibility of adding new local, organic, and non-GMO options is questionable as charging students for their willingness to pay results in only a 1–2% gain in revenue which may not cover the cost of more options in on-campus dining halls.