Benefit and harm of deceased- or living-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

U. Cillo , A. Vitale
{"title":"Benefit and harm of deceased- or living-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"U. Cillo ,&nbsp;A. Vitale","doi":"10.1016/S1594-5804(09)60032-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The decision to allocate a given organ from a deceased (DD) or living donor (LD) to a particular recipient awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is strongly influenced by ethical and health policy issues. The liver transplant community is currently discussing several ethical principles with a view to improving the allocation process as a whole. These principles are: urgency, utility, intention-to-treat survival, transplant benefit, harm to candidates on waiting list (WL), harm to living donors, chances of re-transplantation. The potential conflict between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for a number of reasons: (a) candidates for LT with HCC are increasing; (b) the HCC population varies considerably in prognostic terms; (c) tumor progression before LT in HCC patients may significantly impair post-LT outcome; and (d) effective alternatives to LT are often available for treating HCC patients. In this paper, we propose a model for effectively representing the potential equipoise achievable between the different ethical principles involved in LT. We considered a triangle with transplant benefit (life expectancy with LT minus that without LT) at its superior apex, and potential harm to candidates on the WL and living donor at the inferior apices. The model may be helpful in clinical decision-making regarding LT: (1) by modulating the relative prognostic weight of different ethical principles involved in the relationship between transplant benefit and harm to candidates on the WL; and (2) by simplifying the decision between DDLT and LDLT in a given geographical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100375,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease Supplements","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1594-5804(09)60032-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1594580409600322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The decision to allocate a given organ from a deceased (DD) or living donor (LD) to a particular recipient awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is strongly influenced by ethical and health policy issues. The liver transplant community is currently discussing several ethical principles with a view to improving the allocation process as a whole. These principles are: urgency, utility, intention-to-treat survival, transplant benefit, harm to candidates on waiting list (WL), harm to living donors, chances of re-transplantation. The potential conflict between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for a number of reasons: (a) candidates for LT with HCC are increasing; (b) the HCC population varies considerably in prognostic terms; (c) tumor progression before LT in HCC patients may significantly impair post-LT outcome; and (d) effective alternatives to LT are often available for treating HCC patients. In this paper, we propose a model for effectively representing the potential equipoise achievable between the different ethical principles involved in LT. We considered a triangle with transplant benefit (life expectancy with LT minus that without LT) at its superior apex, and potential harm to candidates on the WL and living donor at the inferior apices. The model may be helpful in clinical decision-making regarding LT: (1) by modulating the relative prognostic weight of different ethical principles involved in the relationship between transplant benefit and harm to candidates on the WL; and (2) by simplifying the decision between DDLT and LDLT in a given geographical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡或活供肝移植治疗肝癌的利与弊
将来自死者(DD)或活体供体(LD)的特定器官分配给等待肝移植(LT)的特定受体的决定受到伦理和卫生政策问题的强烈影响。肝移植界目前正在讨论几个伦理原则,以改善整个分配过程。这些原则是:紧迫性、实用性、存活期、移植益处、对候选者的伤害、对活体供体的伤害、再次移植的机会。不同原则之间的潜在冲突与肝细胞癌(HCC)患者尤其相关,原因如下:(a)肝细胞癌肝移植的候选患者正在增加;(b) HCC人群在预后方面差异很大;(c) HCC患者肝移植前的肿瘤进展可能显著损害肝移植后的预后;(d)肝细胞癌患者通常有肝移植的有效替代方案。在本文中,我们提出了一个模型,可以有效地代表在移植中涉及的不同伦理原则之间可以实现的潜在平衡。我们考虑了一个三角形,其上端具有移植益处(有移植的预期寿命减去没有移植的预期寿命),而下端对WL上的候选人和活体供体的潜在危害。该模型可能有助于临床对移植的决策:(1)通过调节不同伦理原则的相对预后权重,这些原则涉及移植对候选者的益处和伤害之间的关系;(2)简化给定地理环境下DDLT和LDLT之间的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board 2nd Liver Transplantation, HBV and HCV Interdisciplinary Conference Facing HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: antiviral therapy response and clinical outcome Optimization of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis after liver transplantation Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in the transplant setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1