Is exposure therapy outcome affected by a monitoring coping style?

Peter Muris , Peter J de Jong , Harald Merckelbach , Florence van Zuuren
{"title":"Is exposure therapy outcome affected by a monitoring coping style?","authors":"Peter Muris ,&nbsp;Peter J de Jong ,&nbsp;Harald Merckelbach ,&nbsp;Florence van Zuuren","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of <span>Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989)</span> that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 291-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390014S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989) that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暴露治疗的结果是否受到监控应对方式的影响
在本研究中,36例蜘蛛恐惧症患者接受了一次体内暴露治疗。调查了监控(信息寻求)应对方式是否影响治疗结果。总的来说,治疗似乎非常成功。然而,在一周的随访中发现监测与较大的复发有关。这一发现与Steketee, Bransfield, Miller和Foa(1989)的早期研究相冲突,该研究表明,与钝器(信息回避者)相比,监视器(信息寻求者)的治疗结果更好。对看似矛盾的结果的潜在解释进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cancer, personality and stress: Prediction and prevention Adolescent family predictors of substance use during early adulthood: A theoretical model Fears in mental retardation: Part one—Types of fears reported by men and women with and without mental retardation UCS-inflation and acquired fear responses in human conditioning Behavioral treatment of obesity: thirty years and counting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1