Impact of two telemetry transmitter implantation incision suturing methods on the physiological state and condition of perch (Perca fluviatilis)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Archives of Polish Fisheries Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1515/aopf-2017-0009
Maciej Rożyński, A. Kapusta, K. Demska-Zakęś, E. Ziomek, A. Szczerbowski, K. Stawecki, Z. Zakęś
{"title":"Impact of two telemetry transmitter implantation incision suturing methods on the physiological state and condition of perch (Perca fluviatilis)","authors":"Maciej Rożyński, A. Kapusta, K. Demska-Zakęś, E. Ziomek, A. Szczerbowski, K. Stawecki, Z. Zakęś","doi":"10.1515/aopf-2017-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this work was to determine the impact on European perch, Perca fluviatilis L. (mean body weight – 78.33 g) of the intraperitoneal implantation of telemetry transmitters using different suturing methods. In the first experiment silk sutures were used (experiment I – group ST), while in the second tissue adhesive was used (experiment II – group GT). Following the procedure, the fish were kept for 42 days in a recirculating system. Differences in growth and condition parameters were only noted in the first week of the experiment. Specimens from group GT had lower values for DGR (daily growth rate) and SGR (specific growth rate), but a higher value for FCR (feed conversion ratio) values. For the hematological parameters, lower values of MCV (mean corpuscular volume) and PLT (blood platelets) were noted in group GT, while for the biochemical parameters, lowered ALP (alkaline phosphatase) activity and Mg (magnesium) concentrations were noted in group ST. In group ST, 33.3% of the specimens loss their tags, while in group GT 77.8% did so. Differences in incision healing were only noted in the second week, when specimens in group ST were observed to have fully closed incisions, while in group GT 50% of the incisions were open. Despite the high percentage of implantation incision healing in both groups, because of the high values of tag loss rate, neither method can be recommended for perch. It might be more effective to use tag with external antennae in this species. The method use for closing implantation incisions also must be improved to eliminate tag shedding.","PeriodicalId":8293,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Polish Fisheries","volume":"108 1","pages":"101 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Polish Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aopf-2017-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this work was to determine the impact on European perch, Perca fluviatilis L. (mean body weight – 78.33 g) of the intraperitoneal implantation of telemetry transmitters using different suturing methods. In the first experiment silk sutures were used (experiment I – group ST), while in the second tissue adhesive was used (experiment II – group GT). Following the procedure, the fish were kept for 42 days in a recirculating system. Differences in growth and condition parameters were only noted in the first week of the experiment. Specimens from group GT had lower values for DGR (daily growth rate) and SGR (specific growth rate), but a higher value for FCR (feed conversion ratio) values. For the hematological parameters, lower values of MCV (mean corpuscular volume) and PLT (blood platelets) were noted in group GT, while for the biochemical parameters, lowered ALP (alkaline phosphatase) activity and Mg (magnesium) concentrations were noted in group ST. In group ST, 33.3% of the specimens loss their tags, while in group GT 77.8% did so. Differences in incision healing were only noted in the second week, when specimens in group ST were observed to have fully closed incisions, while in group GT 50% of the incisions were open. Despite the high percentage of implantation incision healing in both groups, because of the high values of tag loss rate, neither method can be recommended for perch. It might be more effective to use tag with external antennae in this species. The method use for closing implantation incisions also must be improved to eliminate tag shedding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种遥测发射机植入切口缝合方式对河鲈生理状态的影响
摘要本研究旨在探讨不同缝合方法对欧洲鲈鱼(平均体重- 78.33 g)腹腔内植入遥测发射机的影响。第一组采用丝线缝合(实验1 - ST组),第二组采用组织粘接剂(实验2 - GT组)。按照这个程序,这些鱼在一个循环系统中保存了42天。生长和条件参数的差异仅在实验的第一周被注意到。GT组的日生长率(DGR)和特定生长率(SGR)较低,饲料系数(FCR)较高。血液学指标方面,GT组MCV(平均红细胞体积)和PLT(血小板)较低,生化指标方面,ST组ALP(碱性磷酸酶)活性和Mg(镁)浓度较低。ST组有33.3%的标本丢失标签,GT组有77.8%的标本丢失标签。仅在第二周观察到切口愈合的差异,ST组标本的切口完全闭合,而GT组50%的切口是开放的。尽管两组植入术切口愈合率高,但由于标签丢失率高,因此两种方法都不推荐用于鲈鱼。在该物种中使用带外部触角的标签可能更有效。用于闭合植入切口的方法也必须改进以消除标签脱落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Polish Fisheries
Archives of Polish Fisheries Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structure of the FindFish Knowledge Transfer Platform Impact of a polyunsaturated fatty acid supplement on enriching the nutritional value of brine shrimp nauplii, Artemia sp. Diel differences in the exploitation of shallow inshore habitats by three small bottom-dwelling fishes with implications for their monitoring in a large lowland river A review of the freshwater crabs of Turkey (Brachyura, Potamidae) Impact of the surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters on the condition and health of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.))
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1