Humanity: Respecting What is Real

Stephen Clark
{"title":"Humanity: Respecting What is Real","authors":"Stephen Clark","doi":"10.14394/etyka.1306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion that “human beings”, mainstream humanity, is best conceived as “in the image and likeness of God” has an effect even on secular philosophers, scientists and farmers, despite our understanding that mainstream humanity is only one twig within a larger evolutionary bush. Even if it is taken seriously, it does not license most of our current exploitation. Nor does a merely “contractual” theory of rights and duties support our denial of proper consideration to non-human creatures. Affection rather than self-interest is a better basis for an ethical life. But even empathetic affection is not the whole story: the better way is to respect and admire what is real – and the realization of reality is what classical Platonic philosophers meant by Nous, rather than simply the capacity to reason our way to conclusions. If mainstream humanity has any ground to claim an exceptional status it lies in the possibility of respecting what is real – including all non-human creatures. How that realization must affect our lives here now is an ongoing project.","PeriodicalId":33221,"journal":{"name":"Annales Etyka w Zyciu Gospodarczym","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Etyka w Zyciu Gospodarczym","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion that “human beings”, mainstream humanity, is best conceived as “in the image and likeness of God” has an effect even on secular philosophers, scientists and farmers, despite our understanding that mainstream humanity is only one twig within a larger evolutionary bush. Even if it is taken seriously, it does not license most of our current exploitation. Nor does a merely “contractual” theory of rights and duties support our denial of proper consideration to non-human creatures. Affection rather than self-interest is a better basis for an ethical life. But even empathetic affection is not the whole story: the better way is to respect and admire what is real – and the realization of reality is what classical Platonic philosophers meant by Nous, rather than simply the capacity to reason our way to conclusions. If mainstream humanity has any ground to claim an exceptional status it lies in the possibility of respecting what is real – including all non-human creatures. How that realization must affect our lives here now is an ongoing project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人性:尊重真实
“人类”,即主流人性,最好被设想为“按照上帝的形象和样式”,这一观念甚至对世俗的哲学家、科学家和农民也有影响,尽管我们明白,主流人性只是更大的进化丛林中的一根小树枝。即使它被认真对待,它也不允许我们目前的大部分开发。仅仅是关于权利和义务的“契约”理论也不能支持我们拒绝对非人类生物给予适当考虑。感情而不是个人利益是道德生活的更好基础。但是,即使是移情的情感也不是全部:更好的方式是尊重和钦佩真实的东西——对现实的认识是古典柏拉图哲学家所说的“理性”,而不仅仅是推理得出结论的能力。如果主流人性有任何理由要求一种特殊的地位,那就是尊重真实的可能性——包括所有非人类生物。这种认识如何影响我们现在的生活是一个正在进行的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Więcej niż karton. O Europejskim liderze wzrostu Marcina Piątkowskiego Topicality of John Stuart Mill’s Views on Violence against Women Moralna Interpretacja w ujęciu etyki cnót a psychologia społeczna Odczarowywanie urojeń płciowych Toward a Moderate Hierarchical View About the Moral Status of Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1