An Empirical Analysis of Productivity Changes in the Ethiopian Commercial Banks: Using DEA- Based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach

A. Berhe
{"title":"An Empirical Analysis of Productivity Changes in the Ethiopian Commercial Banks: Using DEA- Based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach","authors":"A. Berhe","doi":"10.5430/AFR.V10N1P48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rationale of this paper is to measure the productivity change of commercial banks in Ethiopia based on DEA-based Malmquist productivity index approach. For this purpose, this study employed a balanced panel data of eight commercial banks operating from 2006 to 2017. The result shows that the banks under study were found to have reported a slight productivity progress of 0.4% over the whole study period. The productivity improvement is accredited to the technological progress (0.9%) rather than the efficiency loss (0.5%). Meanwhile, the finding suggests that the decline in the technical efficiency of the banks was caused both by pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. Alternatively, the finding of the study indicates that the productivity performance of all the banks under study, with the exception of AIB and CBE, remain almost constant in spite of their size during the period. AIB and CBE have exhibit an average productivity progress of 2% and 1.4% respectively during the study period. In the study period, AIB was found to be the most inefficient (2.4%) and the most productive one (2%) comparing to other banks in the study due to retrogress in scale efficiency change (2.1%) as well as technical progress (4.5%) in that order. Further, the paper suggests that the productivity performance of the banks under study was not significantly different in the period. So, the banks have to move forwards their technology to increase productivity more and more, while improving the resource utilization efficiency by up grading their managerial practices and scale operations (optimum size)","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/AFR.V10N1P48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rationale of this paper is to measure the productivity change of commercial banks in Ethiopia based on DEA-based Malmquist productivity index approach. For this purpose, this study employed a balanced panel data of eight commercial banks operating from 2006 to 2017. The result shows that the banks under study were found to have reported a slight productivity progress of 0.4% over the whole study period. The productivity improvement is accredited to the technological progress (0.9%) rather than the efficiency loss (0.5%). Meanwhile, the finding suggests that the decline in the technical efficiency of the banks was caused both by pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. Alternatively, the finding of the study indicates that the productivity performance of all the banks under study, with the exception of AIB and CBE, remain almost constant in spite of their size during the period. AIB and CBE have exhibit an average productivity progress of 2% and 1.4% respectively during the study period. In the study period, AIB was found to be the most inefficient (2.4%) and the most productive one (2%) comparing to other banks in the study due to retrogress in scale efficiency change (2.1%) as well as technical progress (4.5%) in that order. Further, the paper suggests that the productivity performance of the banks under study was not significantly different in the period. So, the banks have to move forwards their technology to increase productivity more and more, while improving the resource utilization efficiency by up grading their managerial practices and scale operations (optimum size)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚商业银行生产率变化的实证分析:基于DEA的Malmquist生产率指数方法
本文的基本原理是基于dea的Malmquist生产率指数方法来衡量埃塞俄比亚商业银行的生产率变化。为此,本研究采用了2006 - 2017年8家商业银行的均衡面板数据。结果表明,在整个研究期间,被研究的银行报告了0.4%的轻微生产力进步。生产率的提高被认为是技术进步(0.9%)而不是效率损失(0.5%)。同时,研究发现,银行技术效率的下降既有纯技术效率的原因,也有规模效率的原因。另外,该研究的发现表明,除亚投行和CBE外,所有被研究银行的生产率表现在此期间几乎保持不变,尽管它们的规模很大。在研究期间,AIB和CBE的平均生产率分别提高了2%和1.4%。在研究期间,由于规模效率变化(2.1%)和技术进步(4.5%)的倒退,与研究中的其他银行相比,亚投行被发现是最低效的(2.4%)和最具生产力的(2%)。此外,本文还表明,在此期间,所研究的银行的生产率绩效并没有显著差异。因此,银行必须不断推进技术进步,不断提高生产率,同时通过提升管理水平和规模经营(最优规模)来提高资源利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of the level of Islamicity performance index on the financial performance of Islamic banks The literature review of Islamic performance measurement models at sharia banks in Indonesia Gender issues in local government accountability reports: insights from Islamic regions in Indonesia Godly accountability: reflection on ethics for zakat accountants Bank social fund distribution and cost of profit-sharing investment account: evidence from Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1