Blessing or curse for regions and firms? Narratives of the sharing economy as an innovative practice in a rural region in Norway

Kristine Blekastad Sagheim, Trond T. Nilsen
{"title":"Blessing or curse for regions and firms? Narratives of the sharing economy as an innovative practice in a rural region in Norway","authors":"Kristine Blekastad Sagheim, Trond T. Nilsen","doi":"10.1080/00291951.2021.1918759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The sharing economy (SE) literature has grown rapidly in recent years. The literature has focused on the diffusion of SE in metropolitan regions, while rural regions have been almost entirely overlooked. To fill this gap, the article examines the SE in a rural region in Norway to explore how it is framed by key actors in regional development at different spatial scales. The article treats the SE as a mechanism through which new knowledge, practices, and routines are developed. The analytical framework reveals how pro-SE and con-SE narratives co-evolve through both endogenous and exogenous factors within the region. The narratives are heterogenic. The pro-SE narrative articulates a viable source of economic growth in regions, whereas the con-SE narrative highlights a fear of undermining rural tourism and liberalization of labour. The article extends the SE literature by providing insights into how innovation paths relate to discursive processes in a rural context. The authors conclude that the SE can both increase positive development paths and obstruct regional development processes, depending on the strength of influence from contextual factors, namely policy regulations.","PeriodicalId":46764,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2021.1918759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The sharing economy (SE) literature has grown rapidly in recent years. The literature has focused on the diffusion of SE in metropolitan regions, while rural regions have been almost entirely overlooked. To fill this gap, the article examines the SE in a rural region in Norway to explore how it is framed by key actors in regional development at different spatial scales. The article treats the SE as a mechanism through which new knowledge, practices, and routines are developed. The analytical framework reveals how pro-SE and con-SE narratives co-evolve through both endogenous and exogenous factors within the region. The narratives are heterogenic. The pro-SE narrative articulates a viable source of economic growth in regions, whereas the con-SE narrative highlights a fear of undermining rural tourism and liberalization of labour. The article extends the SE literature by providing insights into how innovation paths relate to discursive processes in a rural context. The authors conclude that the SE can both increase positive development paths and obstruct regional development processes, depending on the strength of influence from contextual factors, namely policy regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区和企业是福是祸?分享经济作为挪威农村地区创新实践的叙述
共享经济(SE)的文献近年来发展迅速。文献集中在大都市地区的SE扩散,而农村地区几乎完全被忽视。为了填补这一空白,本文考察了挪威农村地区的东南,探讨了不同空间尺度下区域发展的关键行动者是如何构建东南的。本文将SE视为一种机制,通过它可以开发新的知识、实践和例程。分析框架揭示了亲se和反se叙事是如何通过区域内的内生和外生因素共同演变的。叙事各不相同。支持东南偏南的叙述阐明了地区经济增长的可行来源,而反对东南偏南的叙述则强调了对破坏农村旅游业和劳动力自由化的担忧。本文通过提供关于创新路径如何与农村背景下的话语过程相关的见解,扩展了SE文献。作者得出结论,东南沿海既可以增加积极的发展路径,也可以阻碍区域发展进程,这取决于环境因素(即政策法规)的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Transforming Burundian “taste of place”: From shunned in commercial blends to specialty coffee The future of multilocational work and New Working Spaces in small and medium-sized urban municipalities and in rural municipalities: A Norwegian perspective “We have been invaded”: Wind energy sacrifice zones in Åfjord Municipality and their implications for Norway Transitioning to inclusive and nature-based decarbonisaton through recreating tree-based artisanal industries in Kano City, Nigeria Where are low-carbon places made? Conceptualising and studying infrastructure junctions and the power geometries of low-carbon place-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1