UJI EFEK ANTIPIRETIK DAUN SENDUDUK (Melastoma malabathricum L.) PADA TIKUS PUTIH JANTAN (Rattus Norvegicus)

Evi Depiana Gultom, Herti Ayu N Zebua, Robiatun Rambe
{"title":"UJI EFEK ANTIPIRETIK DAUN SENDUDUK (Melastoma malabathricum L.) PADA TIKUS PUTIH JANTAN (Rattus Norvegicus)","authors":"Evi Depiana Gultom, Herti Ayu N Zebua, Robiatun Rambe","doi":"10.36656/jpfh.v5i1.972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The antipyretic effect of flavonoid in senduduk leaf (Melastoma malabathricum L.) is one of the traditional medicines that people used. The goal of this study is to determine the antipyretic effect of the extract of Senduduk leaf (Melastoma malabathricum L.) in male white mice and compare it to paracetamol. The design of this experimental study was a post-test only controlled group design. Twenty-five Wistar furrow mice, aged two months and weighing 200 grams, were utilized as animal models. The mice were divided into five groups, one of which was the negative control group (2 ml water), First dosage of Senduduk leaf extract (100 mg/200 g body weight mice), second dose of the extract (200 mg/200 g body weight mice), and third dose of the extract (300 mg/200 g body weight mice). Temperature measurements were taken before and after the DPT vaccination was administered to mice, and every 30 minutes post treatment until 150 minutes. The result after observing treatment at 30 minutes for dose I (37.930C), dose II (37.760C), and dose III (37.450C). The results at 150 minutes for dose I (37,470C), for dose II (37,150C), and for dose III (36.880C). The result of the research was to analyzed using the one way ANOVA test. The results of statistical observations using the one way ANOVA method showed the significant value was p < 0.05 (0.000). This indicates there are differences from each treatment in antipyretic testing. If continued with the Tukey test, a significant value of p> 0.05 (0.9480), the research concluded that there is no difference in terms of antipyretic testing at a dose of 300mg/KgBW compared to paracetamol. The research concluded is the EEDS at a dose of 300mg/KgBW has the best antipyretic properties compared to paracetamol.","PeriodicalId":17717,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi &amp; Herbal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi &amp; Herbal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36656/jpfh.v5i1.972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antipyretic effect of flavonoid in senduduk leaf (Melastoma malabathricum L.) is one of the traditional medicines that people used. The goal of this study is to determine the antipyretic effect of the extract of Senduduk leaf (Melastoma malabathricum L.) in male white mice and compare it to paracetamol. The design of this experimental study was a post-test only controlled group design. Twenty-five Wistar furrow mice, aged two months and weighing 200 grams, were utilized as animal models. The mice were divided into five groups, one of which was the negative control group (2 ml water), First dosage of Senduduk leaf extract (100 mg/200 g body weight mice), second dose of the extract (200 mg/200 g body weight mice), and third dose of the extract (300 mg/200 g body weight mice). Temperature measurements were taken before and after the DPT vaccination was administered to mice, and every 30 minutes post treatment until 150 minutes. The result after observing treatment at 30 minutes for dose I (37.930C), dose II (37.760C), and dose III (37.450C). The results at 150 minutes for dose I (37,470C), for dose II (37,150C), and for dose III (36.880C). The result of the research was to analyzed using the one way ANOVA test. The results of statistical observations using the one way ANOVA method showed the significant value was p < 0.05 (0.000). This indicates there are differences from each treatment in antipyretic testing. If continued with the Tukey test, a significant value of p> 0.05 (0.9480), the research concluded that there is no difference in terms of antipyretic testing at a dose of 300mg/KgBW compared to paracetamol. The research concluded is the EEDS at a dose of 300mg/KgBW has the best antipyretic properties compared to paracetamol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试檀香叶子的抗树脂效果。雄性白老鼠(学名Rattus Norvegicus)
仙丹叶黄酮类化合物的解热作用是人们常用的传统药物之一。研究仙丹叶提取物对雄性小白鼠的解热作用,并与扑热息痛进行比较。本实验研究设计为仅测试后对照组设计。以25只2月龄、体重200克的Wistar沟鼠为动物模型。将小鼠分为五组,其中一组为阴性对照组(2 ml水),第一剂量仙鹤叶提取物(100 mg/200 g体重小鼠),第二剂量仙鹤叶提取物(200 mg/200 g体重小鼠),第三剂量仙鹤叶提取物(300 mg/200 g体重小鼠)。在给小鼠接种百白破疫苗之前和之后测量温度,在治疗后每30分钟测量一次,直到150分钟。观察剂量I(37.93℃)、剂量II(37.760℃)、剂量III(37.450℃)治疗30分钟后的结果。剂量I (37,470C)、剂量II (37,150C)和剂量III (36.880C)在150分钟的结果。研究结果采用单因素方差分析进行分析。采用单因素方差分析方法进行统计学观察,p < 0.05(0.000)。这表明不同的治疗方法在解热试验中存在差异。如果继续进行Tukey试验,p> 0.05(0.9480)的显著值,研究得出结论,300mg/KgBW的剂量与扑热息痛相比,在解热试验方面没有差异。研究得出结论,与扑热息痛相比,剂量为300mg/KgBW的eds具有最好的解热性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP MASYARAKAT KECAMATAN CAKUNG JAKARTA TIMUR TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN DAN RESISTENSI ANTIBIOTIK FORMULASI SEDIAAN HAIR TONIC EKSTRAK ETANOL DAUN TEH HIJAU (Camellia sinensis L.) SEBAGAI PENUMBUH RAMBUT TERHADAP KELINCI JANTAN (Oryctolagus cuniculus) FORMULASI DAN EVALUASI SEDIAAN SERUM WAJAH EKSTRAK ETANOL KOMBINASI DARI EKSTRAK KULIT JERUK NIPIS (Citrus aurantiifolia) DAN EKSTRAK KULIT BUAH NAGA MERAH (Hylocereus polyrhizus) COMPARISON ANTIOXIDAN ACTIVITY OF RED GINGER (Zingiber officinale var. rubrum) ETANOL EXTRACTION BY MASERATION AND DIGESTI MASERATION METHODS A FORMULATION OF HAND BODY LOTIO FORMULATION OF HAND BODY LOTION EXTRACT ethanol from lily leaves (Crinum asiaticum L.) AS A SKIN MOISTURIZER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1