Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus.

Journal of Comparative Physiology A Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s00359-022-01549-y
K C Buresch, K Sklar, J Y Chen, S R Madden, A S Mongil, G V Wise, J G Boal, R T Hanlon
{"title":"Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus.","authors":"K C Buresch, K Sklar, J Y Chen, S R Madden, A S Mongil, G V Wise, J G Boal, R T Hanlon","doi":"10.1007/s00359-022-01549-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Octopuses have keen vision and are generally considered visual predators, yet octopuses predominantly forage blindly in nature, inserting their arms into crevices to search and detect hidden prey. The extent to which octopuses discriminate prey using chemo- versus mechano-tactile sensing is unknown. We developed a whole-animal behavioral assay that takes advantage of octopuses' natural searching behavior to test their ability to discriminate prey from non-prey tastes solely via contact chemoreception. This methodology eliminated vision, mechano-tactile sensing and distance chemoreception while testing the contact chemosensory discriminatory abilities of the octopus arm suckers. Extracts from two types of prey (crab, shrimp) and three types of non-prey (sea star, algae, seawater) were embedded in agarose (to control for mechano-tactile discrimination) and presented to octopuses inside an artificial rock dome; octopuses reached their arms inside to explore its contents - imitating natural prey-searching behavior. Results revealed that octopuses are capable of discriminating between potential prey items using only contact chemoreception, as measured by an increased amount of sucker contact time and arm curls when presented with prey extracts versus non-prey extracts. These results highlight the importance of contact chemoreception in the multi-modal sensing involved in a complex foraging behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":15397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Physiology A","volume":"8 1","pages":"435-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Physiology A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01549-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Octopuses have keen vision and are generally considered visual predators, yet octopuses predominantly forage blindly in nature, inserting their arms into crevices to search and detect hidden prey. The extent to which octopuses discriminate prey using chemo- versus mechano-tactile sensing is unknown. We developed a whole-animal behavioral assay that takes advantage of octopuses' natural searching behavior to test their ability to discriminate prey from non-prey tastes solely via contact chemoreception. This methodology eliminated vision, mechano-tactile sensing and distance chemoreception while testing the contact chemosensory discriminatory abilities of the octopus arm suckers. Extracts from two types of prey (crab, shrimp) and three types of non-prey (sea star, algae, seawater) were embedded in agarose (to control for mechano-tactile discrimination) and presented to octopuses inside an artificial rock dome; octopuses reached their arms inside to explore its contents - imitating natural prey-searching behavior. Results revealed that octopuses are capable of discriminating between potential prey items using only contact chemoreception, as measured by an increased amount of sucker contact time and arm curls when presented with prey extracts versus non-prey extracts. These results highlight the importance of contact chemoreception in the multi-modal sensing involved in a complex foraging behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
章鱼对猎物多模态感知中的接触化学感受。
章鱼具有敏锐的视力,通常被认为是视觉捕食者,但章鱼在自然界中主要是盲目觅食,将手臂插入裂缝中寻找和发现隐藏的猎物。章鱼在多大程度上利用化学感应和机械触觉感应来辨别猎物是未知的。我们开发了一种全动物行为试验,利用章鱼的自然搜索行为来测试它们仅通过接触化学感受来区分猎物和非猎物味道的能力。该方法在测试章鱼手臂吸盘的接触化学感觉区分能力时,消除了视觉、机械触觉感知和距离化学感受。将两种猎物(螃蟹、虾)和三种非猎物(海星、藻类、海水)的提取物嵌入琼脂糖中(以控制机械触觉辨别),并在人造岩石穹顶内呈现给章鱼;章鱼将它们的手臂伸进去探索里面的东西——模仿自然的捕食行为。结果表明,章鱼能够仅通过接触化学感受来区分潜在的猎物,这是通过吸盘接触时间和手臂卷曲的增加来衡量的,当呈现猎物提取物与非猎物提取物时。这些结果强调了接触化学接受在复杂觅食行为中涉及的多模态感知中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Representation of bulk water flow in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) midbrain Population parameters of Drosophila larval cooperative foraging “Resistance leads to self-destruction”: how an (a)political strategy helped Karl von Frisch succeed during the Nazi era Size matters: individual variation in auditory sensitivity may influence sexual selection in Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla) Avian migration clocks in a changing world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1